skip to main content
research-article

Fitting the Needs of an Industry: An Examination of Games Design, Development, and Art Courses in the UK

Published:01 April 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

There have been growing criticisms in recent years among the computer and video games community on the apparent lack of graduates capable of meeting the industry’s employment needs. Following the sharp rise in the number of computer and video games courses across higher education (HE) institutions in the UK and across the globe, this article examines the composition of existing British games design, development, and art programs in relation to prescribed study areas voiced by industry bodies. From a sample of 242 courses, and a further 11 industry-derived and accredited programs, the results explore content currently residing within a variety of games programs and qualification types and evaluate the extent to which such content adheres to the industry’s demand for the focus on specific skills and study areas. The findings point toward certain shortfalls in some key areas deemed to be important by industry professionals and the consideration of the degree to which course providers should cater to the specific demands of industry.

References

  1. Albeck, C. 2008. Quoted in Northern exposure. EDGE 193, Future Publishing, Bath, UK, 160--167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes, T. 2007. Quoted in Brighton peers. EDGE 180, Future Publishing, Bath, UK, 76--83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates, B. 2003. Game Developer’s Market Guide. Premier Press, Boston, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Benamati, J., Ozdemir, Z., and Smith, J. 2010. Aligning undergraduate IS curricula with industry needs. Comm. ACM 53, 3, 152--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Burns, B. 2008. Teaching the computer science of computer games. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 23, 3, 154--161. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Burton, N. 2008. Quoted in teacher feature. EDGE 187, Future Publishing, Bath, UK, 18--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Business Insights. 2011. The Video Gaming Industry Outlook. Gaming Segment Analysis, Key Stakeholders, New Challenges and Future Developments. Business Insights, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Carrington, D., Strooper, P., Newby, S., and Stevenson, T. 2005. An industry/university collaboration to upgrade software engineering knowledge and skills in industry. J. Syst. Softw. 75, 29--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Carter, L. 2006. Why students with an apparent aptitude for computer science don’t choose to major in computer science. In Proceedings of the 37th Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’06). 27--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Cellan-Jones, R. 2008. UK games industry needs brains. BBC News. Available online at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7460352.stm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapman, C. 2008. Quoted in Class of 2000. EDGE 190, Future Publishing, Bath, UK, 72--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Coleman, R., Krembs, M., Labouseur, A., and Weir, J. 2005. Game design and programming concentration within the computer science curriculum. In Proceedings of the 36th Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’05). 545--550. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Coller, B. and Scott, M. 2009. Effectiveness of using a video game to teach a course in mechanical engineering. Comput. Educ. 53, 3, 900--912. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Cooper, G. 2009. How to get a job in...art. Develop 190, Intent Media, Hertfordshire, UK, 30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Cranmer, S. 2006. Enhancing graduate employability: Best intentions and mixed outcomes. Stud. High. Educ. 31, 2, 169--184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Craswell, G. 2007. Deconstructing the skills training debate in doctoral education. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 26, 4, 377--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Defoe, D., Kurkovsky, S., and Graetz, E. 2011. Short mobile game development projects for introductory CS courses: Conference workshop. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 26, 5, 141--143. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Duvall, S. 2009. Creating a games class: A walkthrough. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games (FDG’09). 279--284. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Future Publishing. 2007a. Get into Games Supplement. EDGE 180.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Future Publishing. 2007b. Brighton peers. EDGE 180, 76--83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Future Publishing. 2008a. Get into games. EDGE 193, 137--153.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Future Publishing. 2008b. Class of 2000. EDGE 190, 72--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Future Publishing. 2009. Get into games. EDGE 206, 117--151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Estey, A., Gooch, A., and Gooch, B. 2009. Addressing industry issues in a multi-disciplinary course on game design. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games (FDG’09). 71--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Hasson, F. 2007. Quoted in Isn’t it all academic? Develop 69, Intent Media, Hertfordshire, 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. IGDA. 2003. IGDA Curriculum framework. The study of games and game development, Version 2.3. http://www.igda.org/academia/curriculum_framework.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. IGDA. 2008. IGDA Curriculum framework. The study of games and game development, Version 3.2. http://www.igda.org/academia/curriculum_framework.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. IGDA. 2009. http://www.igda.org/about/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Ip, B. and Capey, M. 2008. Computer games degrees in the UK: A review of current practice. In Proceedings of Asia Educators (SIGGRAPH’08). Article 21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Jeffery, M. 2007. The war for talent. Develop 69, Intent Media, Hertfordshire, 49--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jeffery, M. 2008. An audience with Matthew Jeffery. EDGE 196, Future Publishing, Bath, UK, 74--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones, R. 2000. Design and implementation of computer games: A capstone course for undergraduate computer science education. In Proceedings of the 31st Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’00). 260--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Kurkovsky, S. 2009. Engaging students through mobile game development. In Proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’09). 44--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Lameman, B., El-Nasr, M., Drachen, A., Foster, W., Moura, D., and Aghabeigi, B. 2010. User studies: A strategy towards a successful industry-academic relationship. In Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on the Future of Game Design and Technology (FUTUREPLAY’10). 134--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Livingstone, I. and Hope, A. 2011. Next generation transforming the UK into the world’s leading talent hub for the video games and visual effects industries. http://www.nesta.org.uk/home1/assets/features/next_gen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Madams, T. 2008. Quoted in class of 2000. EDGE 190, Future Publishing, Bath, UK, 72--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. McGill, M. 2008. Critical skills for game developers: An analysis of skills sought by industry. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Future Play: Research, Play, Share (FUTUREPLAY’08). 89--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. McGill, M. 2009a. Defining the expectation gap: A comparison of industry needs and existing game development curriculum. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games (FDG’09). 129--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. McGill, M. 2009b. Weighted game developer qualifications for consideration in curriculum development. In Proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’09). 347--351. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Mikami, K., Watanabe, T., Yamaji, K., Ozawa, K., Ito, A., Kawashima, M., Takeuchi, R., Kondo, K., and Kaneko, M. 2010. Construction trial of a practical education curriculum for game development by industry-university collaboration in Japan. Comput. Graph. 34, 791--799. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Molesworth, M. and Scullion, R. 2005. The impact of commercially promoted vocational degrees on the student experience. J. High. Educ. Pol. Man. 27. 2, 209--225.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Morrison, B. and Preston, J. 2009. Engagement: Gaming throughout the curriculum. In Proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’09). 342--346. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Murray, S. 2009. Quoted in Get into games. EDGE 206, Future Publishing, Bath, UK, 117--151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Pascail, L. 2006. The emergence of the skills approach in industry and its consequences for the training of engineers. Euro. J. Eng. Educ. 31, 1, 55--61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Porter, P. 2008. Quoted in Northern exposure. EDGE 193, Future Publishing, Bath, UK, 160--167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. QAA. 2007. Subject benchmark statements. Computing, Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/benchmark/statements/computing07.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. QAA. 2010. Subject benchmark statements. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/academicinfrastructure/benchmark/default.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Rocco, D. and Yoder, D. 2007. Design of a media and gaming sequence for graduates in applied CS. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 22, 5, 131--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Sanches, J. D. 2007. Job’s a good ‘un. Develop 69, Intent Media, Hertfordshire, UK, 37--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. SEEC. 2011. FAQs. http://www.seec.org.uk/academic-credit/faqs.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Skillset. 2008. Undergraduate course accreditation. Guidelines for computer games. http://courses.skillset.org/assets/0000/0915/Computer_Games_-_Undergraduate_Accreditation_Application_Guidance_-_2008.09.final.doc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Skillset. 2011a. About Skillset. http://www.skillset.org/skillset/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Skillset. 2011b. Computer games industry accredited courses. http://www.skillset.org/games/accreditation/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Swan, R. 2008. Quoted in class of 2000. EDGE 190, Future Publishing, Bath, UK, 72--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Swain, C. 2009. Improving academic-industry collaboration for game research and education. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games (FDG’09). 191--198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Taylor, R. 2008. Quoted in northern exposure. EDGE 193, Future Publishing, Bath, UK, 160--167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Train2Game. 2011a. About us. http://www.train2game.com/about/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Train2Game. 2011b. Courses. http://www.train2game.com/courses/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Train2Game. 2011c. Key features. http://www.train2game.com/courses/artist-and-animator/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Vogel, H. 2007. Entertainment Industry Economics 7th Ed. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Volk, D. 2008. How to embed a game engineering course into a computer science curriculum. In Proceedings of the Conference on Future Play: Research, Play, Share (FDG’08). 192--195. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Williams, T. 2009. How to get a job in ... coding. Develop 91, Intent Media, Hertfordshire, UK, 29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Wilson, R. 2010. Operating in the new world of video games. Playing the game. Insider views on video game development. http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/assets/features/playing_the_game_insider_views_on_video_game_development.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Zyda, M., Lacour, V., and Swain, C. 2008. Operating a computer science game degree program. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Game Development in Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’08). 71--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Fitting the Needs of an Industry: An Examination of Games Design, Development, and Art Courses in the UK

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Computing Education
        ACM Transactions on Computing Education  Volume 12, Issue 2
        April 2012
        133 pages
        EISSN:1946-6226
        DOI:10.1145/2160547
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 April 2012
        • Accepted: 1 December 2011
        • Revised: 1 October 2011
        • Received: 1 July 2011
        Published in toce Volume 12, Issue 2

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader