skip to main content
10.1145/2187836.2187895acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Care to comment?: recommendations for commenting on news stories

Published:16 April 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many websites provide commenting facilities for users to express their opinions or sentiments with regards to content items, such as, videos, news stories, blog posts, etc. Previous studies have shown that user comments contain valuable information that can provide insight on Web documents and may be utilized for various tasks. This work presents a model that predicts, for a given user, suitable news stories for commenting. The model achieves encouraging results regarding the ability to connect users with stories they are likely to comment on. This provides grounds for personalized recommendations of stories to users who may want to take part in their discussion. We combine a content-based approach with a collaborative-filtering approach (utilizing users' co-commenting patterns) in a latent factor modeling framework. We experiment with several variations of the model's loss function in order to adjust it to the problem domain. We evaluate the results on two datasets and show that employing co-commenting patterns improves upon using content features alone, even with as few as two available comments per story. Finally, we try to incorporate available social network data into the model. Interestingly, the social data does not lead to substantial performance gains, suggesting that the value of social data for this task is quite negligible.

References

  1. G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 17(6):734--749, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. Agarwal, B.-C. Chen, and B. Pang. Personalized recommendation of user comments via factor models. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 571--582, July 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. B.-C. Chen, J. Guo, B. Tseng, and J. Yang. User reputation in a comment rating environment. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD 2011), pages 159--167, August 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. S. Das, M. Datar, A. Garg, and S. Rajaram. Google news personalization: scalable online collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web , WWW '07, pages 271--280, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. G. Dror, Y. Koren, Y. Maarek, and I. Szpektor. I want to answer; who has a question?: Yahoo! answers recommender system. In KDD, pages 1109--1117, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. T. Fawcett. An introduction to roc analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8):861--874, June 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Goldberg, D. Nichols, B. M. Oki, and D. Terry. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Commun. AC M, 35:61--70, December 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C.-F. Hsu, E. Khabiri, and J. Caverlee. Ranking comments on the social web. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering-Volume 04, pages 90--97, August 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Hu, A. Sun, and E.-P. Lim. Comments-oriented document summarization: understanding documents with readers AZ feedback. In Proc. of ACM SIGIR '08, pages 291--298, July 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Y. Koren, R. M. Bell, and C. Volinsky. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. IEEE Computer, 42(8):30--37, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. B. Li, S. Xu, and J. Zhang. Enhancing clustering blog documents by utilizing author/reader comments. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Southeast Regional Conference, 2007, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, pages 94--99, March 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Q. Li, J. Wang, Y. P. Chen, and Z. Lin. User comments for news recommendation in forum-based social media. Information Sciences, 180(24):4929--4939, December 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Li and S. Manandhar. Improving question recommendation by exploiting information need. In ACL, pages 1425--1434, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. G. Linden, B. Smith, and J. York. Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Computing, 7(1):76--80, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. C. D. Manning, P. Raghavan, and H. Schutze. Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. G. Mishne and N. Glance. Leave a reply: An analysis of weblog comments. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 625--632, May 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. B. Pang and L. Lee. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1-2):1--135, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. S. Park, M. Ko, J. Kim, Y. Liu, and J. Song. The politics of comments: Predicting political orientation of news stories with commenters sentiment patterns. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2011, pages 113--122, March 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. P. A. Pavlou and A. Dimoka. The nature and role of feedback text comments in online marketplaces: Implications for trust building, price premiums, and seller differentiation. Information Systems Research, 17(4):392--414, December 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. I. Pilaszy and D. Tikk. Recommending new movies: even a few ratings are more valuable than metadata. In Proc. of the 3rd ACM Conf. on Recommender Systems (RecSys'09), page 93100, New York, NY, USA, October 23--25 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. H. Rangwala and S. Jamali. Co-participation networks using comment information. In Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pages 315--318, May 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. S. Rendle, C. Freudenthaler, Z. Gantner, and L. Schmidt-Thieme. Bpr: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In Proc. 25th Conference Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intel ligence (UAI), pages 452--461, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. F. Ricci, L. Rokach, B. Shapira, and P. B. Kantor, editors. Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Reidl. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web, WWW '01, pages 285--295, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. A. Schuth, M. Marx, and M. de Rijke. Extracting the discussion structure in comments on news-articles. In WIDM, pages 97--104, November 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. S. Siersdorfer, S. Chelaru, W. Nejdl, and J. S. Pedro. How useful are your comments? analyzing and predicting youtube comments and comment ratings. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 891--900, April 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. G. TakRScs, I. Pilaszy, B. NRZmeth, and D. Tikk. On the gravity recommendation system. In KDD C up Workshop at SIGKDD '07, pages 22--30, August 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. M. Tsagkias, W. Weerkamp, and M. de Rijke. Predicting the volume of comments on online news stories. In Proceeding of the 18th ACM conference on Information a nd knowledge management (CIKM), pages 1765--1768, November 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. M. Tsagkias, W. Weerkamp, and M. de Rijke. News comments: Exploring, modeling, and online prediction. InAd vances in Information Retrieval, 32nd European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2010. Proceedings, pages 191--203, March 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. J. Weston, S. Bengio, and N. Usunier. Large scale image annotation: Learning to rank with joint word-image embeddings. Machine Learning Journal, 81:21--35, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. W. G. Yee, A. Yates, S. Liu, and O. Frieder. Are web user comments useful for search? In 7th Workshop on Large-Scale Distributed Systems for Information Retrieval (LSDS-IR) at SIGIR '09, pages 63--70, July 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Care to comment?: recommendations for commenting on news stories

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WWW '12: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web
      April 2012
      1078 pages
      ISBN:9781450312295
      DOI:10.1145/2187836

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 April 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader