skip to main content
research-article

Perception and replication of planar sonic gestures

Published:22 October 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

As tables, boards, and walls become surfaces where interaction can be supported by auditory displays, it becomes important to know how accurately and effectively a spatial gesture can be rendered by means of an array of loudspeakers embedded in the surface. Two experiments were designed and performed to assess: (i) how sequences of sound pulses are perceived as gestures when the pulses are distributed in space and time along a line; (ii) how the timing of pulses affects the perceived and reproduced continuity of sequences; and (iii) how effectively a second parallel row of speakers can extend sonic gestures to a two-dimensional space. Results show that azimuthal trajectories can be effectively replicated and that switching between discrete and continuous gestures occurs within the range of inter-pulse interval from 75 to 300ms. The vertical component of sonic gestures cannot be reliably replicated.

References

  1. Adcock, M. and Barrass, S. 2004. Cultivating design patterns for auditory displays. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, T. H. and Zhai, S. 2008. “Writing with music”: Exploring the use of auditory feedback in gesture interfaces. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 7, 17:1--17:24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bakker, S., van den Hoven, E., and Eggen, B. 2010. Exploring interactive systems using peripheral sounds. In Haptic and Audio Interaction Design, R. Nordahl et al. eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6306. Springer, Berlin, 55--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Begault, D. R., Anderson, M. R., and McClain, M. U. 2006. Spatially modulated auditory alerts for aviation. J. Audio Eng. Soc 54, 4, 276--282.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bremer, C. D., Pittenger, J. B., Warren, R., and Jenkins, J. J. 1977. An illusion of auditory saltation similar to the cutaneous “rabbit”. Amer. J. Psychol. 90, 4, 645--654.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Brown, L. and Brewster, S. 2003. Drawing by ear: Interpreting sonified line graphs. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display. E. Brazil and B. Shinn-Cunningham, Eds., 152--156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, R. A. and Belendiuk, K. 1977. Spectral cues utilized in the localization of sound in the median sagittal plane. J. Acoustical Soc. Amer. 61, 5, 1264--1269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Caramiaux, B., Susini, P., Bianco, T., Bevilacqua, F., Houix, O., Schnell, N., and Misdariis, N. 2011. Gestural embodiment of environmental sounds: An experimental study. In Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. A. R. Jensenius et al., Eds., 144--148Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlile, S. and Best, V. 2002. Discrimination of sound source velocity in human listeners. J. Acoustical Soc. Amer. 111, 2, 1026--1035.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. De Bruyn, L., Moelants, D., and Leman, M. 2011. An embodied approach to testing musical empathy in participants with an autism spectrum disorder. Music and Medicine 4, 28--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Delle Monache, S., Polotti, P., and Rocchesso, D. 2010. A toolkit for explorations in sonic interaction design. In Proceedings of the 5th Audio-Mostly Conference: A Conference on Interaction with Sound (AM'10), ACM, New York, 1:1--1:7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Delle Monache, S. and Rocchesso, D. 2011. The curse of the where-rabbit: research through design of auditory trajectories. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCHI Italian Chapter International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Facing Complexity (CHItaly). ACM, New York, 79--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Desmet, F., Leman, M., Lesaffre, M., and De Bruyn, L. 2010. Statistical analysis of human body movement and group interactions in response to music. In Advances in Data Analysis, Data Handling and Business Intelligence, A. Fink et al., Eds., Springer, Berlin, 399--408.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Deutsch, D. 2010. Hearing music in ensembles. Physics Today 63, 2, 40--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Erkut, C., Iylha, A., and Rocchesso, D. 2013. Heigh ho: Rhythmicity in sonic interaction. In Sonic Interaction Design, K. Franinovic and S. Serafin, Eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. To appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Getzmann, S. 2008. The effect of spectral difference on auditory saltation. Experiment. Psychol. 55, 1, 64--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Goldreich, D. 2007. A Bayesian perceptual model replicates the cutaneous rabbit and other tactile spatiotemporal illusions. PLoS ONE 2, 3, e333+.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hartmann, W. M. 1999. How we localize sound. Phys. Today 52, 11, 24--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ihlefeld, A. and Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. 2011. Effect of source spectrum on sound localization in an everyday reverberant room. J. Acoustical Soc. Amer. 130, 1, 324+.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Jensenius, A. R., Wanderley, M. M., Godøy, R. I., and Leman, M. 2010. Musical gestures: concepts and methods inresearch. In Musical Gestures: Sound, Movement, and Meaning, R. I. Godøy and M. Leman, Eds., Routledge, New York, 12--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kilian, K. 2009. From brand identity to audio branding. In Audio Branding. Brands, Sound and Communication, K. Bronner and R. Hirt, Eds., Nomos, Baden-Baden, 35--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kubovy, M. and Schutz, M. 2010. Audio-visual objects. Rev. Philos. Psychol. 1, 41--61. 10.1007/s13164-009-0004-5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Lakatos, S. 1993a. Recognition of complex auditory-spatial patterns. Perception 22, 3, 363--374.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Lakatos, S. 1993b. Temporal constraints on apparent motion in auditory space. Percept. Psychophys. 54, 2, 139--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Lemmens, P., Crompvoets, F., Brokken, D., van den Eerenbeemd, J., and de Vries, G.-J. 2009. A body-conforming tactile jacket to enrich movie viewing. In Proceedings of the World Haptics - 3rd Joint EuroHaptics Cconference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 7--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Mills, A. W. 1958. On the minimum audible angle. J. Acoustical Soc. Amer. 30, 4, 237--246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Muller, M. 2007. Information Retrieval for Music and Motion. Springer, Berlin. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Muller-Tomfelde, C. and Steiner, S. 2001. Audio-enhanced collaboration at an interactive electronic whiteboard. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display. 267--271.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Neuhoff, J. 2004. Auditory motion and localization. In Ecological Psychoacoustics, J. Neuhoff, Ed., Academic Press, New York, 87--111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Patel, N. S. and Hughes, D. E. 2012. Revolutionizing human-computer interfaces: The auditory perspective. Interactions 19, 34--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Perrott, D. R. and Saberi, K. 1990. Minimum audible angle thresholds for sources varying in both elevation and azimuth. J. Acoustical Soc. Amer. 87, 4, 1728--1731.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Phillips, D. P. and Hall, S. E. 2001. Spatial and temporal factors in auditory saltation. J. Acoustical Soc. Amer. 110, 3, 1539--1547.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Raisamo, J., Raisamo, R., and Surakka, V. 2009. Evaluating the effect of temporal parameters for vibrotactile saltatory patterns. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI-MLMI'09), ACM, New York, 319--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Rakerd, B. and Hartmann, W. M. 1985. Localization of sound in rooms, ii: The effects of a single reflecting surface. J. Acoustical Soc. Amer. 78, 2, 524--533.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Rocchesso, D. and Delle Monache, S. 2011. Spatio-temporal unfolding of sound sequences. In Proceedings of the Sound and Music Computing Conference, 265--272.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Ruff, R. M. and Perret, E. 1982. Spatial mapping of two-dimensional sound patterns presented sequentially. Percept. Motor Skills 55, 1, 155--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Rusconi, E., Kwan, B., Giordano, B. L., Umilta, C., and Butterworth, B. 2006. Spatial representation of pitch height: The SMARC effect. Cognition 99, 2, 113--129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Saberi, K. and Perrott, D. R. 1990. Minimum audible movement angles as a function of sound source trajectory. J. Acoustical Soc. Amer. 88, 6, 2639--2644.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., and Shimojo, S. 2002. Visual illusion induced by sound. Cognitive Brain Res. 14, 1, 147--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Shore, D. I., Hall, S. E., and Klein, R. M. 1998. Auditory saltation: A new measure for an old illusion. J. Acoustical Soc. Amer. 103, 6, 3730--3733.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Tolkmitt, F. J. and Brindley, R. 1977. Auditory perception of spatiotemporal patterns. Amer. J. Psychol. 90, 1, 73--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Van Valkenburg, D. and Kubovy, M. 2003. In defense of the theory of indispensable attributes. Cognition 87, 225--233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Wang, Z. and Ben-Arie, J. 1996. Conveying visual information with spatial auditory patterns. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 4, 6, 446--455.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Ware, C. 2004. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Wright, M., Cassidy, R J., and F., Z. M. 2004. Audio and gesture latency measurements on Linux and OSX. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. 423--429.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Zahorik, P., Brungart, D. S., and Bronkhorst, A. W. 2005. Auditory distance perception in humans: A summary of past and present research. Acta Acustica 91, 3, 409--420.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Zbyszynski, M., Wright, M., Momeni, A., and Cullen, D. 2007. Ten years of tablet musical interfaces at CNMAT. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on New interfaces for Musical Expression. ACM, New York, 100--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Perception and replication of planar sonic gestures

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Applied Perception
        ACM Transactions on Applied Perception  Volume 9, Issue 4
        October 2012
        109 pages
        ISSN:1544-3558
        EISSN:1544-3965
        DOI:10.1145/2355598
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 October 2012
        • Revised: 1 June 2012
        • Accepted: 1 June 2012
        • Received: 1 March 2012
        Published in tap Volume 9, Issue 4

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader