skip to main content
10.1145/2380718.2380722acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Personality and patterns of Facebook usage

Published:22 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

We show how users' activity on Facebook relates to their personality, as measured by the standard Five Factor Model. Our dataset consists of the personality profiles and Facebook profile data of 180,000 users. We examine correlations between users' personality and the properties of their Facebook profiles such as the size and density of their friendship network, number uploaded photos, number of events attended, number of group memberships, and number of times user has been tagged in photos. Our results show significant relationships between personality traits and various features of Facebook profiles. We then show how multivariate regression allows prediction of the personality traits of an individual user given their Facebook profile. The best accuracy of such predictions is achieved for Extraversion and Neuroticism, the lowest accuracy is obtained for Agreeableness, with Openness and Conscientiousness lying in the middle.

References

  1. Facebook f8: Redesigning and hitting 800 million users. LA Times, September 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Y. Amichai-Hamburger and G. Vinitzky. Social network use and personality. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6):1289--1295, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M.D. Back, J. M. Stopfer, S. Vazire, S. Gaddis, S. C. Schmukle, B. Egloff, and S. D. Gosling. Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21(3):372, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. M.R. Barrick and M. K. Mount. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personnel psychology, 44(1):1--26, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. C.M. Bishop and SpringerLink (Service en ligne). Pattern recognition and machine learning, volume 4. springer New York, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. Byrne, W. Griffitt, and D. Stefaniak. Attraction and similarity of personality characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(1):82, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. T. Correa, A. W. Hinsley, and H. G. De Zuniga. Who interacts on the web?: The intersection of users' personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2):247--253, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. P.T. Costa Jr and R. R. McCrae. Neo personality inventory--revised (neo-pi-r) and neo five-factor inventory (neo-ffi) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D.C. Evans, S. D. Gosling, and A. Carroll. What elements of an online social networking profile predict target-rater agreement in personality impressions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pages 1--6, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Finder. For some, online persona undermines a résumé. New York Times, 11, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Golbeck, C. Robles, and K. Turner. Predicting personality with social media. In CHI, pages 253--262, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. L.R. Goldberg. The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American psychologist, 48(1):26, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. L.R. Goldberg. A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality psychology in Europe, 7:7--28, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. L.R. Goldberg, J. A. Johnson, H. W. Eber, R. Hogan, M. C. Ashton, C. R. Cloninger, and H. G. Gough. The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1):84--96, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. S.D. Gosling, A. A. Augustine, S. Vazire, N. Holtzman, and S. Gaddis. Manifestations of personality in online social networks: Self-reported facebook-related behaviors and observable profile information. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S.D. Gosling, S. Gaddis, and S. Vazire. Personality impressions based on facebook profiles. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. G. Holmes, A. Donkin, and I. H. Witten. Weka: A machine learning workbench. In Intelligent Information Systems, 1994. Proceedings of the 1994 Second Australian and New Zealand Conference on, pages 357--361. Ieee, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. T.A. Judge, C. A. Higgins, C. J. Thoresen, and M. R. Barrick. The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel psychology, 52(3):621--652, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. E.L. Kelly and J. J. Conley. Personality and compatibility: A prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1):27, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. D.J. Ozer and V. Benet-Martinez. Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 57:401--421, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. C. Ross, E. S. Orr, M. Sisic, J. M. Arseneault, M. G. Simmering, and R. R. Orr. Personality and motivations associated with facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2):578--586, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. M.T. Russell, D. L. Karol, Institute for Personality, and Ability Testing. The 16PF fifth edition administrator's manual. Institute for Personality and Ability Testing Champaign, IL, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. T. Ryan and S. Xenos. Who uses facebook? an investigation into the relationship between the big five, shyness, narcissism, loneliness, and facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. R.P. Tett, D. N. Jackson, and M. Rothstein. Personality measures as predictors of job performance: a meta-analytic review. Personnel psychology, 44(4):703--742, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. E.C. Tupes and R. E. Christal. Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60(2):225--251, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. S. Zhao, S. Grasmuck, and J. Martin. Identity construction on facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5):1816--1836, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. B. Zhong, M. Hardin, and T. Sun. Less effortful thinking leads to more social networking? the associations between the use of social network sites and personality traits. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Personality and patterns of Facebook usage

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WebSci '12: Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference
      June 2012
      531 pages
      ISBN:9781450312288
      DOI:10.1145/2380718

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 June 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate218of875submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      Websci '24
      16th ACM Web Science Conference
      May 21 - 24, 2024
      Stuttgart , Germany

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader