skip to main content
10.1145/2396761.2396803acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Interpreting keyword queries over web knowledge bases

Published:29 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many keyword queries issued to Web search engines target information about real world entities, and interpreting these queries over Web knowledge bases can often enable the search system to provide exact answers to queries. Equally important is the problem of detecting when the reference knowledge base is not capable of answering the keyword query, due to lack of domain coverage.

In this work we present an approach to computing structured representations of keyword queries over a reference knowledge base. We mine frequent query structures from a Web query log and map these structures into a reference knowledge base. Our approach exploits coarse linguistic structure in keyword queries, and combines it with rich structured query representations of information needs.

References

  1. G. Agarwal, G. Kabra, and K. C. Chang. Towards rich query interpretation: walking back and forth for mining query templates. In Proc. 19th intl. conference on World wide web, pages 1--10. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. C. Barr, R. Jones, and M. Regelson. The linguistic structure of english web-search queries. In Proc. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP'08, pages 1021--1030. ACL, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. Blanco, P. Mika, and S. Vigna. Effective and efficient entity search in rdf data. In The Semantic Web -- ISWC 2011, volume 7031 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 83--97, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. T. Cheng, X. Yan, and K. C. Chang. EntityRank: searching entities directly and holistically. In VLDB, pages 387--398, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. Fagin, B. Kimelfeld, Y. Li, S. Raghavan, and S. Vaithyanathan. Understanding queries in a search database system. In Proc. twenty-ninth ACM symposium on Principles of database systems, PODS'10, pages 273--284. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Fernandez, V. Lopez, M. Sabou, V. Uren, D. Vallet, E. Motta, and P. Castells. Semantic search meets the web. In Semantic Computing, 2008 IEEE intl. conference on, pages 253 --260, Aug. 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. V. Hristidis, L. Gravano, and Y. Papakonstantinou. Efficient IR-style keyword search over relational databases. In Proc. 29th intl. conference on Very large data bases, pages 850--861. VLDB Endowment, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. V. Hristidis and Y. Papakonstantinou. Discover: keyword search in relational databases. In Proc. 28th intl. conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB'02, pages 670--681. VLDB Endowment, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Hulgeri and C. Nakhe. Keyword searching and browsing in databases using BANKS. In Proc. 18th intl. conference on Data Engineering, ICDE'02. IEEE Computer Society, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. V. Kacholia, S. Pandit, S. Chakrabarti, S. Sudarshan, R. Desai, and H. Karambelkar. Bidirectional expansion for keyword search on graph databases. In Proc. 31st intl. conference on Very large data bases, VLDB'05, pages 505--516, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. B. Katz, S. Felshin, D. Yuret, A. Ibrahim, J. J. Lin, G. Marton, A. J. McFarland, and B. Temelkuran. Omnibase: Uniform access to heterogeneous data for question answering. In NLDB, pages 230--234, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. D. Lafferty, A. McCallum, and F. C. N. Pereira. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proc. Eighteenth intl. conference on Machine Learning, ICML'01, pages 282--289, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Y. Lei, V. S. Uren, and E. Motta. SemSearch: a search engine for the semantic web. In EKAW, pages 238--245, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. X. Li. Understanding the semantic structure of noun phrase queries. In Proc. 48th Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL'10, pages 1337--1345. ACL, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. P. Liang, M. I. Jordan, and D. Klein. Learning Dependency-Based compositional semantics. In ACL, pages 590--599, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. V. Lopez, M. Fernndez, E. Motta, and N. Stieler. PowerAqua: supporting users in querying and exploring the semantic web content. Semantic Web Journal, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M. Manshadi and X. Li. Semantic tagging of web search queries. In Proc. Joint Conference of the 47th ACL and the 4th Intl. Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 861--869. ACL, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. Pound, I. F. Ilyas, and G. Weddell. Expressive and flexible access to web-extracted data: a keyword-based structured query language. In Proc. 2010 intl. conference on Management of data, SIGMOD'10, pages 423--434. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. Pound, P. Mika, and H. Zaragoza. Ad-hoc object retrieval in the web of data. In Proc. 19th intl. conference on World wide web, WWW'10, pages 771--780. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. N. Sarkas, S. Paparizos, and P. Tsaparas. Structured annotations of web queries. In Proc. 2010 intl. conference on Management of data, SIGMOD'10, pages 771--782. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. F. Sha and F. Pereira. Shallow parsing with conditional random fields. In Proc. 2003 Conference of the North American Association for Computational Linguistics, NAACL'03, pages 134--141, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. F. M. Suchanek, G. Kasneci, and G. Weikum. Yago: A core of semantic knowledge - unifying WordNet and wikipedia. In 16th Intl. World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2007), pages 697--706, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. S. Tata and G. M. Lohman. SQAK: doing more with keywords. In Proc. 2008 ACM SIGMOD intl. conference on Management of data, SIGMOD'08, pages 889--902. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. T. Tran, H. Wang, S. Rudolph, and P. Cimiano. Top-k exploration of query candidates for efficient keyword search on graph-shaped (rdf) data. In Data Engineering, 2009. ICDE'09. IEEE 25th intl. conference on, pages 405--416, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Yahoo! Academic Relations. http://webscope.sandbox.yahoo.com/catalog.php - L13 - Yahoo! Search Query Tiny Sample.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Q. Zhou, C. Wang, M. Xiong, H. Wang, and Y. Yu. SPARK: adapting keyword query to semantic search. In The Semantic Web, volume 4825 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 694--707. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2007. 10.1007/978--3--540--76298-0\_50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Interpreting keyword queries over web knowledge bases

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CIKM '12: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
        October 2012
        2840 pages
        ISBN:9781450311564
        DOI:10.1145/2396761

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 29 October 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader