skip to main content
column

Are call detail records biased for sampling human mobility?

Published:05 December 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Call detail records (CDRs) have recently been used in studying different aspects of human mobility. While CDRs provide a means of sampling user locations at large population scales, they may not sample all locations proportionate to the visitation frequency of a user, owing to sparsity in time and space of voice-calls, thereby introducing a bias. Also, as the rate of sampling is inherently dependent on the calling frequencies of an individual, high voice-call activity users are often chosen for conducting a meaningful study. Such a selection process can, inadvertently, lead to a biased view as high frequency callers may not always be representative of an entire population. With the advent of 3G technology and wide adoption of smart-phones, cellular devices have become versatile end-hosts. As the data accessed on these devices does not always require human initiation, it affords us with an unprecedented opportunity to validate the utility of CDRs for studying human mobility. In this work, we investigate various metrics for human mobility studied in literature for over a million cellular users in the San Francisco bay-area, for over a month. Our findings reveal that although the voice-call process does well to sample significant locations, such as home and work, it may in some cases incur biases in capturing the overall spatio-temporal characteristics of individual human mobility. Additionally, we motivate an "artificially" imposed sampling process, vis-a-vis the voice-call process with the same average intensity. We observe that in many cases such an imposed sampling process yields better performance results based on the usual metrics like entropies and marginal distributions used often in literature.

References

  1. A.-L. Barabasi, The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics, Nature 435 (2005), 207--2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. R. Becker, R. Cáceres, K. Hanson, J. M. Loh, S. Urbanek, A. Varshavsky, and C. Volinsky, Classifying routes using cellular handoff patterns, Proc. of Netmob 2011 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Borckmann, L. Hufnagel, and T. Geisel, The scaling laws of human travel, Nature 439 (2006), 462--465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. A. Chaintreau, P. Hui, J. Crowcroft, C. Diot, R. Gass, and J. Scott, Impact of human mobility on the design of opportunistic forwarding algorithms, Proc. IEEE Infocom'06, Barcelona, Spain, Apr. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. T. Couronné, Z. Smoreda, and A.-M. Olteanu, Chatty mobiles: Individual mobility and communication patterns, Proc. of Netmob 2011 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas, Elements of information theory, Wiley-Interscience, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. C. Gonzalez, C. A. Hidalgo, and A.-L. Barabasi, Understanding individual human mobility patterns, Nature 435 (2008), 779--782.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. A. Hartigan, Clustering algorithms, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1975). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. http://crawdad.cs.dartmouth.edu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Isaacman, R. Becker, R. Cáceres, S. Kobourov, M. Martonosi, J. Rowland, and A. Varshavsky, Identifying important places in people's lives from cellular network data, 9th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Pervasive (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Kim and D. Kotz, Periodic properties of user mobility and access-point popularity, Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11 (2007), no. 6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Kim, D. Kotz, and S. Kim, Extracting a mobility model from real user traces, Proc. IEEE Infocom'06 (2006).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. J. Lin, Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy, IEEE transactions on information theory 37, no. 1, 145--151. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Nanavati, S. Gurumurthy, G. Das, D. Chakraborty, K. Dasgupta, S. Mukherjea, and A. Joshi, On the structural properties of massive telecom call graphs: findings and implications, Proc. of 15th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 2006, pp. 435--444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Noulas, S. Scellato, R. Lambiotte, M. Pontil, and C. Mascolo, A tale of many cities: universal patterns in human urban mobility, PLoS One 7 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. G. Ranjan, Z.-L. Zhang, S. Ranjan, R. Keralapura, and J. Robinson, Un-zipping cellular infrastructure locations via user geo-intent, Proc. of Infocom (2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. I. Rhee,M. Shin, S. Hong, K. Lee, and S. Chong, On the levy-walk nature of human mobility: do humans walk like monkeys?, Proc. IEEE Infocom'08, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. C. Song, Z. Qu, N. Blumm, and A.-L. Barabasi, Limits of predictability in human mobility, Science 327 (2010), 1018--1021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. L. Song, D. Kotz, R. Jain, and X. He, Evaluating next-cell predictors with extensive WiFi mobility data, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 5 (December 2006), no. 12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. I. Trestian, S. Ranjan, A. Kuzmanovic, and A. Nucci, Measuring serendipity: Connecting people, locations and interest in a mobile 3G network, Proc. of ACM Internet Measurement Conference (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Are call detail records biased for sampling human mobility?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review
      ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review  Volume 16, Issue 3
      July 2012
      43 pages
      ISSN:1559-1662
      EISSN:1931-1222
      DOI:10.1145/2412096
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2012 Authors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 December 2012

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • column

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader