skip to main content
10.1145/2422518.2422527acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodelsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A runtime model for fUML

Published:01 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the introduction of fUML, an OMG standard defining the operational semantics of a subset of UML and the conforming virtual machine, UML models can be used not only for informal design sketching but also for completely building executable systems. Although this has been an important step for UML, the full potential of having executable UML models, such as enabling runtime analysis and adaptation, cannot be realized using the standardized virtual machine due to the lack of the adequate means for accessing important runtime information and controlling the execution of UML models. In this paper, we aim at establishing the necessary basis to overcome this limitation. Therefore, we introduce extensions of the standardized fUML virtual machine in terms of a dedicated trace model, an event model, and a command API. We provide an open-source implementation of the proposed extensions, as well as a model debugger for UML models based on this implementation to demonstrate the feasibility of the presented concepts.

References

  1. G. S. Blair, N. Bencomo, and R. B. France. [email protected]. IEEE Computer, 42(10):22--27, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Broy, M. V. Cengarle, H. Grönniger, and B. Rumpe. Definition of the system model. In UML 2 Semantics and Applications, pages 61--93. Wiley, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. B. R. Bryant, J. Gray, M. Mernik, P. J. Clarke, R. B. France, and G. Karsai. Challenges and directions in formalizing the semantics of modeling languages. Computer Science and Information Systems, 8(2):225--253, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. C. Ghezzi, A. Mocci, and M. Sangiorgio. Runtime monitoring of functional component changes with behavior models. In Proc. of MODELS'11, pages 152--166, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Hamou-Lhadj and T. C. Lethbridge. A metamodel for the compact but lossless exchange of execution traces. Softw. Syst. Model., 11(1):77--98, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Hutchinson, J. Whittle, M. Rouncefield, and S. Kristoffersen. Empirical assessment of MDE in industry. In Proc. of ICSE '11, pages 471--480, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Maoz. Model-based traces. In Proc. of MODELS'08, pages 109--119, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. J. Mellor and M. J. Balcer. Executable UML: A foundation for model-driven architecture. Addison Wesley, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. B. Selic. The less well known UML. In Formal Methods for MDE, volume 7320 of LNCS, pages 1--20. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. T. Vogel, S. Neumann, S. Hildebrandt, H. Giese, and B. Becker. Incremental model synchronization for efficient run-time monitoring. In Proc. of MODELS'09, pages 124--139, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A runtime model for fUML

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MRT '12: Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on [email protected]
        October 2012
        66 pages
        ISBN:9781450318020
        DOI:10.1145/2422518

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 October 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader