skip to main content
10.1145/2457276.2457297acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmedesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Digital ecosystems: challenges and prospects

Published:28 October 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mimicking biological ecosystems, digital ecosystems refer to complex and interdependent systems and their underlying infrastructures by which all constituents interact and exhibit as a whole self-organizing, scalable and sustainable behaviors. This emerging topic is of great interest to scholars. Nevertheless, we observe a divergence of opinions and a disagreement about what Digital Ecosystems are, how they are designed, and what their applications should be. In this paper, we present an overall view of the concept of Digital Ecosystem and provide background for a common understanding. Firstly, we identify four factors that have lead to the emergence of Digital Ecosystems and present their definitions, characteristics and categories. Secondly, we discuss models and simulation tools to show current achievements and limitations. Finally, we illustrate the main challenges and shed light on further work in the field of Digital Ecosystems.

References

  1. Nachira, F. 2002. Towards a Network of Digital Business Ecosystems Fostering The Local Development. Technical Report. Directorate General Information Society and Media, European Commission.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jansen, S. and Cusumano, M. Defining Software Ecosystems: A Survey of Software Platforms and Business Network Governance. Proceedings of IWSECO, (2012), 41--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Herb S. The free lunch is over: A Fundamental Turn Toward Concurrency in Software. Dr. Dobb's Journal, 30, 3 (2005)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Elisha, M. J. The application of Information and Communication Technology in Nigerian academic libraries prospects and problems. J. Information Manager 6, 1 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Rheingold, H. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. The MIT Press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Schettkat, R. and Yocarini, L. The shift to services employment: A review of the literature. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 17, 2 (2006), 127--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Fiorina, C. 2000. The Digital Ecosystem, Speech at World Resources Institute Conference, Seattle, Washington.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fu, H. Formal Concept Analysis for Digital Ecosystem. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, (2006), 143--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. P Dini, et al. 2000. The digital ecosystems research vision: 2010 and beyond. Technical Report, European Commission.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Open Philosophies for Associative Autopoietic Digital Ecosystems (OPAALS), Network of Excellence. http://www.opaals.eu/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gerard Briscoe, Digital Ecosystems, Dissertation (2009), Cornell University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Razavi, A., Moschoyiannis, S., and Krause, P. An open digital environment to support business ecosystems. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications 2, 4 (2009), 367--397.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Brian D., et al. Rules for (digital) ecosystem growth and development?. http://tihane.wordpress.com/2010/04/22/rules-for-digitalecosystem-growth-and-development/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Heylighen, F. Complexity and Self-organization. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, eds. MJ Bates & MN Maack Taylor & Francis, (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Briscoe, G. and De Wilde, P. Digital ecosystems: self-organisation of evolving agent populations. Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems, ACM (2009), 7:44--7:48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hill, M. D. What is scalability? ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News 18, 4 (1990), 18--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. United Nations General Assembly (2005). 2005 World Summit Outcome, Resolution A/60/1, adopted by the General Assembly (September, 2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Iansiti, M. and Levien, R. The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability. Harvard Business Review Press (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Francesco N., et al. Digital Business Ecosystems. Information Society and Media (2007): 5, European Commission.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Paul S. Knowledge Ecology: Knowledge Ecosystems for Business Education and Training. http://www.facstaff.bucknell.edu/shrivast/KnowledgeEcology.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Chatterjee, J. and Prabhakar, T. V. On to Action--Building a Digital Ecosystem for Knowledge Diffusion in Rural India. WP 7: Community Networks and Digital Ecosystems, (2008), 14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Chatterjee, J., et al. Evolution of a Digital Ecosystem for Knowledge Services to Indian Agriculture. Digital Business Ecosystems Book (2007), European Commission.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Sawatani, Y. 2007. Research in Service Ecosystems. In: Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology. (Portland, Aug. 5--9, 2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Briscoe, G. and De Wilde, P. Digital ecosystems: evolving service-orientated architectures. Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Bio inspired models of network, information and computing systems, ACM (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Dorloff, F.-D. Service descriptions in Digital Ecosystems: based on standards and converters. 2010 4th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST), (2010), 75--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Liu, P., Zhang, P., and Nie, G. Business modeling for service ecosystems. The International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystem (2010), 102--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Nimmagadda, S. L., Nimmagadda, S. K., and Dreher, H. Multidimensional ontology modeling of human digital ecosystems affected by social behavioural data patterns. 2010 4th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST), (2010), 498--503.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Biuk-Aghai, R. P., Tang, L. V.-S., Fong, S., and Si, Y.-W. Wikis as digital ecosystems: An analysis based on authorship. 3rd IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies. DEST '09, (2009), 581--586.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Nicolis, G. and Prigogine, I. Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems: From Dissipative Structures to Order through Fluctuations. John Wiley & Sons, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Fischer, R., Scholten, U., and Scholten, S. A reference architecture for feedback-based control of service ecosystems. 2010 4th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST), (2010), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Ferronato, P. Architecture for Digital Ecosystems, beyond Service Oriented Architecture (IEEE-DEST 2007). Digital EcoSystems and Technologies Conference, 2007. DEST '07. Inaugural IEEE-IES, (2007), 660--665.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Bhakti, M. A. C., Abdullah, A. B., and Jung, L. T. Autonomic, self-organizing service-Oriented Architecture in service ecosystem. 2010 4th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies, (2010), 153--158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Briscoe, G. Complex Adaptive Digital Ecosystems. Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems, ACM (2010), 39--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Francesco N., et al., Digital Business Ecosystems, Information Society and Media (2007): 126, European Commission.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Palmonari, M. and Batini, C. Abstract ERIA: a web language for conceptual metadata integration and abstraction in the large. Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems, ACM (2009), 18:117--18:125. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. T. Kurz. 2008. EvE simulator. http://evesim.sourceforge.net/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Lurgi, M. An ecologically inspired simulation tool for managing digital ecosystems. Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems, ACM (2010), 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Lurgi, M. and Estanyol, F. Managing a digital business ecosystem using a simulation tool. Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems, ACM (2010), 213--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Projects - *ORA | CASOS, http://www.casos.cs.cmu.edu/projects/ora/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Digital ecosystems: challenges and prospects

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            MEDES '12: Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems
            October 2012
            199 pages
            ISBN:9781450317559
            DOI:10.1145/2457276
            • General Chair:
            • Janusz Kacprzyk,
            • Program Chair:
            • Dominique Laurent,
            • Publications Chair:
            • Richard Chbeir

            Copyright © 2012 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 28 October 2012

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            MEDES '12 Paper Acceptance Rate16of50submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate267of682submissions,39%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader