skip to main content
10.1145/2468356.2468505acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

How personality influences users' needs for recommendation diversity?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

The existing approaches for enhancing diversity in online recommendations neglect the user's spontaneous needs that might be potentially influenced by her/his personality. In this paper, we report our ongoing research on exploring the actual impact of personality values on users' needs for recommendation diversity. The results from a preliminary user survey are reported, that show the significantly causal relationship from personality factors (such as conscientiousness) to the users' diversity preference (not only over the item's individual attributes but also on all attributes when they are combined). We further present our plan for the follow-up work and discuss its practical implications.

References

  1. Adamopoulos, P. and Tuzhilin, A. On unexpectedness in recommender systems: Or how to expect the unexpected. In Proc of RecSys'11 Intl. Workshop on Novelty and Diversity in Recommender Systems (DiveRS'11), ACM Press (2011), 11--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Gunawardana, A. and Shani, G. Evaluating recommendation systems. In Recommender Systems Handbook. 2010, 1--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Hellriegel, D. and Wlldman, R. In Organizational Behavior (Eleventh edition). Cincinnati, Ohio--Southwestern college pub (2000), 64--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hu, R. and Pu, P. Acceptance issues of personalitybased recommender systems. In Proc. RecSys 2009, ACM Press (2009), 221--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hurley, N. and Zhang, M. Novelty and diversity in topn recommendation -- Analysis and evaluation. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 10, 4 (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jia, J., Fischer, G.W., and Dyer, J. Attribute weighting methods and decision quality in the presence of response error: A simulation study. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (1998) 11:85--105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Johnson, J.A. Descriptions used in ipip-neo narrative report. http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/j/5/j5j/IPIPNEOdescri ptions.html, June 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. McNee, S.M., Riedl, J., and Konstan, J.A. Being accurate is not enough: How accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 1097--1101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Rentfrow, P.J. and Gosling, S.D. The do re mi's of everyday life: The structure and personality correlates of music preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84, 6 (2003), 1236--1256.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Smyth, B. and McClave, P. Similarity vs. diversity. In Proc. ICCBR 2001, Springer-Verlag (2001), 347--361. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Tkalcic, J., Kunaver, M., and Tasic, J. Personality based user similarity measure for a collaborative recommender system. In the 5th Workshop on Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction Real World Challenges (2009), 30--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ziegler, C., Mcnee, S.M., Konstan, J.A., and Lausen, G. Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In Proc. WWW 2005, ACM Press (2005), 22--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. How personality influences users' needs for recommendation diversity?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '13: CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3360 pages
      ISBN:9781450319522
      DOI:10.1145/2468356

      Copyright © 2013 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '13 Paper Acceptance Rate630of1,963submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader