skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2466205acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing for the living room: long-term user involvement in a living lab

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Living Labs provide a research infrastructure for long-term user involvement in Participatory Design processes. Users take part in software co-creation during context analysis, for concept development, reflecting on early-stage prototypes and evaluations in the field. In this paper we describe lessons learned from our Living Lab in the area of home entertainment, with 27 participants from 16 households, over a 2.5 year period. We show that this kind of long-term participation of users involves various challenges over the lifetime of the project. We highlight several aspects that need to be considered carefully when setting up such a Living Lab, concerning the selection of participants, maintenance of participants' motivation, establishment of a trust relationship, and the coordination of collaboration.

References

  1. Almirall, E. Living Labs and Open innovation: Roles and Applicability. eJOV 10, 3 (2008), 21--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bannon, L. J., Schmidt, K., and Wagner, I. Lest We Forget - The European Field Study Tradition and the Issue of Conditions of Work in CSCW Research. Proc. of ECSCW '11, (2011), 213--232.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Holst, M., and Ståhlbröst, A. Concept Design with a Living Lab Approach. Proc. of HICSS '09, IEEE (2009), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. and Larsson, S. A Case Study of Real-World Testing. Proc. of MUM '08, ACM (2008), 113--116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bernhaupt, R., Obrist, M., Weiss, A., Beck, E., and Tscheligi, M. Trends in the Living Room and Beyond. CIE 6, 1 (2008), 5:1--5:23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bødker, K., Kensing, F., and Simonsen, J. Participatory IT Design: Designing for Business and Workplace Realities. The MIT Press, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Crabtree, A. and Rodden, T. Domestic Routines and Design for the Home. JCSCW 13, 2 (2004), 191--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ehn, P. Participation in Design Things. Proc. of PDC '08, ACM (2008), 92--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V.-P., Kulkki, S., and Hribernik, K. A. Living Labs as a Multi-Contextual R&D Methodology. Proc. of ICE '06, (2006).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Følstad, A. Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review. eJOV 10, August (2008), 99--131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gaver, B., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. Design: Cultural Probes. Interactions 6, 1 (1999), 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine de Gruyter, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. CRC Press, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Harboe, G., Metcalf, C. J., Bentley, F., Tullio, J., Massey, N., and Romano, G. Ambient Social TV: Drawing People into a Shared Experience. Proc. of CHI '08, ACM (2008), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hess, J., Ley, B., Ogonowski, C., Reichling, T., Wan, L., and Wulf, V. New Technology@Home: Impacts on Usage Behavior and Social Structures. Proc. of EuroITV '12, ACM (2012), 185--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hess, J., Ley, B., Ogonowski, C., Wan, L., and Wulf, V. Jumping between Devices and Services: Towards an Integrated Concept for Social TV. Proc. of EuroITV '11, ACM (2011), 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hess, J., Wan, L., Ley, B., and Wulf, V. In-situ Everywhere: A Feedback Infrastructure for Cross Platform Home-IT. Proc. of EuroITV '12, ACM (2012), 75--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., et al. Technology Probes: Inspiring Design for and with Families. Proc. of CHI '03, ACM (2003), 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Intille, S. S., Larson, K., Beaudin, J. S., Nawyn, J., Munguia Tapia, E., and Kaushik, P. A Living Laboratory for the Design and Evaluation of Ubiquitous Computing Technologies. Proc. CHI '05, ACM (2005), 1941--1944. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kanstrup, A. M. Living Lab Skagen 2008. Danish HCI Research Symp. '08, (2008), 59--62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kensing, F. and Blomberg, J. Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns. JCSCW 7, 3-4 (1998), 167--185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lievens, B., Milić-Frayling, N., Lerouge, V., et al. Managing Social Adoption and Technology Adaption in Longitudinal Studies of Mobile Media Applications. Proc. of MUM '10, ACM (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lindquist, S., Westerlund, B., Sundblad, Y., Tobiasson, H., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., and Mackay, W. Codesigning Communication Technology with and for Families - Methods, Experience, Results and Impact. In N. Streitz, A. Kameas and I. Mavrommati, eds., The Disappearing Computer. Springer, 2007, 99--119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Muller, M. J. and Kuhn, S. Participatory design. CACM 36, 6 (1993), 24--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Mulvenna, M., Martin, S., McDade, D., Beamish, E., De Oliveira, A., and Kivilehto, A. TRAIL Living Labs Survey: A Survey of the ENOLL Living Labs. University of Ulster, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Niitamo, V.-P., Kulkki, S., Eriksson, M., and Hribernik, K. A. State-of-the-art and good practice in the field of living labs. Proc. of ICE '06, (2006).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Obrist, M., Bernhaupt, R., and Tscheligi, M. Interactive TV for the Home: An Ethnographic Study on Users' Requirements and Experiences. IJHCI 24, 2 (2008), 174--196.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. O'Brien, J., Rodden, T., Rouncefield, M., and Hughes, J. At Home with the Technology: An Ethnographic Study of a Set-Top-Box Trial. ToCHI 6, 3 (1999), 282--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Randall, D., Harper, R., and Rouncefield, M. Fieldwork for Design: Theory and Practice. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. De Ruyter, B. and Aarts, E. Ambient Intelligence: visualizing the future. Proc. of AVI '04, ACM (2004), 203--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Schaffers, H., Cordoba, M., Hongisto, P., Kallai, T., Merz, C., and Van Rensburg, J. Exploring Business Models for Open Innovation in Rural Living Labs. Proc. of ICE '07, (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Schuurman, D., Evens, T., and De Marez, L. A Living Lab Research Approach for Mobile TV. Proc. of EuroITV '09, ACM (2009), 189--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Schuurman, D., De Moor, K., De Marez, L., and Evens, T. Investigating User Typologies and Their Relevance within a Living Lab-Research Approach for ICT-Innovation. Proc. of HICSS '10, IEEE (2010), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Sleeswijk Visser, F. and Visser, V. Re-using users: cocreate and co-evaluate. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 10, 2-3 (2006), 148--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Ståhlbröst, A. Exploring the Testbed Field. Proc. of IS Research Seminars Scandinavia, (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Tsekleves, E., Whitham, R., Kondo, K., and Hill, A. Bringing the television experience to other media in the home. Proc. of EuroITV '09, ACM (2009), 201--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Designing for the living room: long-term user involvement in a living lab

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader