skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2470700acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Digital motherhood: how does technology help new mothers?

Published:27 April 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

New mothers can experience social exclusion, particularly during the early weeks when infants are solely dependent on their mothers. We used ethnographic methods to investigate whether technology plays a role in supporting new mothers. Our research identified two core themes: (1) the need to improve confidence as a mother; and (2) the need to be more than \'18just' a mother. We reflect on these findings both in terms of those interested in designing applications and services for motherhood and also the wider CHI community.

References

  1. Avan, B., Richter, L.M., Ramchandani, P.G., Norris, S.A., and Stein, A. Maternal postnatal depress and children's growth and behaviour during the early years of life: exploring the interaction between physical and mental health. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 95, (2010), 690--695.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Barclay, L., Everitt, L., Rogan, F., Shmied, V., and Wyllie, A. \'1cBecoming a mother\'1d -- an analysis of women's experience of early motherhood. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25, (1997), 719--728.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. BabyCenter. BabyCentre's \'1c2011 21st Century Mum Report\'1d. 22 September 2011. URL: http://www.investegate.co.uk/article.aspx?id=20110922 11000571560. Last accessed on 3rd September 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Brady, E., and Guerin, S. \'1cNot the Romantic, All Happy, Coochy Coo Experience\'1d: A Qualitative Analysis of Interactions on an Irish Parenting Web Site. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, (2010) 15, 14--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernhardt, J.M., and Felter, E.M. Online Pediatric Information Seeking Among Mothers of Young Children: Results From a Qualitative Study Using Focus Groups. Journal of Medical Internet Research (2004) 6,1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Borning, A. and Muller, M. Next Steps for Value Sensitive Design. Proc. CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 1125--1134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Daneback, K., and Plantin, L. Research on Parenthood and the Internet: Themes and Trends. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace (Cyberpsychology), (2008), 2(2), article 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dennis, C., and Chung-Lee, L. Postpartum Depression Help-Seeking Barriers and Maternal Treatment Preferences: A Qualitative Systematic Review. Birth, (2006), 33(4), 323--331.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ecology -- Ecology Global Network. Birth and Death Data. URL: http://www.ecology.com/birth-death-rates/. Last accessed 30th December 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Furman, L., and O'Riordan, M. How do mothers feel about their very low birth weight infants? Development of a new measure. Infant Mental Health Journal 27(2), (2006), 152--172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Glaser, B.G., and Strauss, A.L. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Transaction, New Jersey (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Halligan, S.L., Murray, L., Martins, C., and Cooper, P.J. Maternal depression and psychiatric outcomes in adolescent offsprint: A 13-year longitudinal study. Journal of Affective Disorders 97 (2007), 145--154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Hui, M., Ly, C., and Neustaedter, C. MammiBelli: Sharing Baby Activity Levels Between Expectant Mothers and Their Intimate Social Groups. Proc. EA CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 1649--1654. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jomhari, N., Gonzalez, V.M., and Kurniawan, S.H. See the Apple of My Eye: Baby Storytelling in Social Space. Proc. BCS HCI People and Computers XXIII, (2009), 238--243. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Larsson, M. A descriptive study of the use of the Internet by women seeking pregnancy-related information. Midwifery, 25 (2009), 14--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Leigh, B., and Milgrom, J. Risk factors for antenatal depression, postnatal depression and parenting stress. BMC Psychiatry, (2008) 8, 24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Madge, C., & O'Connor, H. Parenting gone wired: empowerment of new mothers on the internet? Social & Cultural Geography, (2006) 7:02, 199--220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. McDaniel, B.T., Coyne, S.M., and Holmes, E.K. New Mothers and Media Use: Associations Between Blogging, Social Networking, and Maternal Well-Being. Maternal and Child Health Journal, (2012), 16(7), 1509--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Meadows, S. The association between perceptions of social support and maternal mental health: A cumulative perspective. Journal of Family Issues, (2011), 32, 181208.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. MIND. URL: http://www.mind.org.uk. Last accessed on 30th December 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Mothercare. URL: http://www.mothercare.com. Last accessed on 30th December 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Netmums. URL: http://www.netmums.com. Last accessed on 3rd September 2012Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Nielsenwire. Infographic: Getting to know (and Like) the Social Mum. URL: http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/gettin g-to-know-and-like-the-social-mom/ Oct 25th 2011. Last accessed 30th December 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Nielsenwire. Infographic: The Digital Lives of American Moms. URL:http:// http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/digita l-lives-of-american-moms/ May 11, 2012. Last accessed 3rd September 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Nolan, M.L., Mason, V., Snow, S., Messenger, W., Catling, J., and Upton, P. Making Friends at Antenatal Classes: A Qualitative Exploration of Friendship Across the Transition to Motherhood. The Journal of Perinatal Education, (2012), 21(3), 178--185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Sarkadi, A., and Bremberg, S. Socially unbiased parenting support on the Internet: a cross-sectional study of users of a large Swedish parenting website. Child: Care, Health and Development (2004) 31, 1, 43--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Social Issues Research Centre. Changing Face of Motherhood. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Thomas, J.O., Rankin, Y.A., Tuta, M., and Mibuari, E. Supporting Greater Access to Pre- and Post-natal information and Services for Women in Rural Kenya. Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 2353--2358. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Digital motherhood: how does technology help new mothers?

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            April 2013
            3550 pages
            ISBN:9781450318990
            DOI:10.1145/2470654

            Copyright © 2013 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 27 April 2013

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate392of1,963submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader