skip to main content
10.1145/2492517.2492564acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An agent-based approach to modeling online social influence

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 August 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to better understand social influence in online social media. Therefore, we propose a method in which we implement, validate and improve an individual behavior model. The behavior model is based on three fundamental behavioral principles of social influence from the literature: 1) liking, 2) social proof and 3) consistency. We have implemented the model using an agent-based modeling approach. The multi-agent model contains the social network structure, individual behavior parameters and the scenario that are obtained from empirical data. The model is validated by comparing the output of the multi-agent simulation with empirical data. We demonstrate the method by evaluating five versions of behavior models applied to the use case of Twitter behavior about a talent show on Dutch television.

References

  1. J. Holland, Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Johns, "Human behavior modeling within an integrative framework," Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. P. R. Monge and N. S. Contractor, Theories of Communication Networks. Oxford University Press, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. M. Macal, "To agent-based simulation from system dynamics," in Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference, B. Johansson, S. Jain, J. Montoya-Torres, J. Hugan, and E. Ycesan, Eds., 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. E. Bonabeau, "Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 7280--7287, May 14 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M. Remondino, "Reactive and deliberative agents applied to simulation of socio-economical and biological systems," International Journal of Simulation, vol. 6, no. 12--13, pp. 11--25, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. T. C. Schelling, Micromotives and Macrobehavior. Norton, 1978, vol. 17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. F. M. Bass, "A new product growth for model consumer durables," Management Science, vol. 15, p. 215227, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. D. Watts and P. S. Dodds, "Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation," Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 441--58, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. L. Weng, A. Flammini, A. Vespignani, and F. Menczer, "Competition among memes in a world with limited attention," Scientific Reports, vol. 2, 2012, 29 March.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. H. Simon, "A behavioral model of rational choice," Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 69, p. 99188, 1955.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. Bratman, Intention, plans, and practical reason. Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA., 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Rao and M. P. Georgeff, "BDI-agents: From theory to practice," in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multiagent Systems (ICMAS'95), 1995, pp. 312--319.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. I. Ajzen, "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational behavior and human decision processes, vol. 50 (2), pp. 179--211, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Z. D. Zhang T., "Agent-based simulation of consumer purchase decision-making and the decoy effect," Journal of Business Research, vol. 60, pp. 912--922, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. R. B. Cialdini, Influence: Science and practice, 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. Koster, "Modelling individual and collective choice behaviour in social networks: An approach combining a nested conditional logit model with latent classes and an agent based model," Master's thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Goldenberg, O. Lowengart, and D. Shapira, "Zooming in: Self-emergence of movements in new product growth," Marketing Science, vol. 28, no. 2, p. 274292, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. "The Voice Kids," Talpa Media Holding, February-March (season 1) 2012, premiered on RTL 4. {Online}. Available: http://www.thevoicekids.nlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. M. Wedel and W. DeSarbo, "A mixture likelihood approach for generalized linear models," Journal of Classification, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 21--55, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. M. North, N. Collier, J. Ozik, E. Tatara, M. Altaweel, C. Macal, M. Bragen, and P. Sydelko, "Complex adaptive systems modeling with repast simphony," Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling, vol. 1, no. 3, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An agent-based approach to modeling online social influence

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ASONAM '13: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining
          August 2013
          1558 pages
          ISBN:9781450322409
          DOI:10.1145/2492517

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 25 August 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate116of549submissions,21%

          Upcoming Conference

          KDD '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader