skip to main content
10.1145/2501988.2502038acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Panopticon: a parallel video overview system

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Panopticon is a video surrogate system that displays multiple sub-sequences in parallel to present a rapid overview of the entire sequence to the user. A novel, precisely animated arrangement slides thumbnails to provide a consistent spatiotemporal layout while allowing any sub-sequence of the original video to be watched without interruption. Furthermore, this output can be generated offline as a highly efficient repeated animation loop, making it suitable for resource-constrained environments, such as web-based interaction. Two versions of Panopticon were evaluated using three different types of video footage with the aim of determining the usability of the proposed system. Results demonstrated an advantage over another surrogate with surveillance footage in terms of search times and this advantage was further improved with Panopticon 2. Eye tracking data suggests that Panopticon's advantage stems from the animated timeline that users heavily rely on.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

uist361.mp4

mp4

63.4 MB

References

  1. Christel, M. (2008). Supporting video library exploratory search: when storyboards are not enough. In Proc. CIVR 08 (pp. 447--456). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Cunningham, S., & Nichols, D. (2008). How people find videos. In Proc. JCDL '08 (pp. 201--210). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ding, W. and Marchionini, G. A Study on Video Browsing Strategies. Tech. Report CS-TR-3790, UMIACS-TR-97-40, CLIS-TR-97-06, University of Maryland. 1997. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Divakaran, A., & Otsuka, I. (2007). A video-browsing-enhanced personal video recorder. In Proc. ICIAPW '07 (pp. 137--142). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gil, N., Silva, N., Dias, E., & Martins, P. (2012). Going through the clouds: search overviews and browsing of movies. In Proc. MindTrek 12 (pp. 158--165). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Haering, N., Venetianer, P. L., & Lipton, A. (2008). The evolution of video surveillance: an overview. Machine Vision and Applications, 19(5--6), 279--290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hollingworth, A. (2009). Two forms of scene memory guide visual search: Memory for scene context and memory for the binding of target object to scene location. Visual Cognition, 17(1--2), 37--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Marchionini, G., Song, Y., & Farrell, R. (2009). Multimedia surrogates for video gisting: Toward combining spoken words and imagery. Information Processing & Management, 45(6), 615--630. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Matejka, J., Grossman, T., & Fitzmaurice, G. (2013). Swifter: Improved Online Video Scrubbing. In Proc. CHI 2013. pp. 1159--1168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Palmer, S. M., & Rosa, M. G. P. (2006). A distinct anatomical network of cortical areas for analysis of motion in far peripheral vision. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 24(8), 2389--405.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Schoeffmann, K., Hopfgartner, F., Marques, O., Boeszoermenyi, L., & Jose, J. M. (2010). Video browsing interfaces and applications: a review. SPIE Reviews, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Song, Y., & Marchionini, G. (2007). Effects of Audio and Visual Surrogates for Making Sense of Digital Video. In Proc. CHI 2007 (pp. 867--876). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Tse, T., Marchionini, G., Ding, W., Slaughter, L., & Komlodi, A. (1998). Dynamic key frame presentation techniques for augmenting video browsing. In Proc. AVI '98 (pp. 185--194). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Wildemuth, B., Marchionini, G., Wilkens, T., & Yang, M. (2002). Alternative surrogates for video objects in a digital library: users' perspectives on their relative usability. LNCS, 2458, 493--507. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Wildemuth, B., Sun Oh, J., & Marchionini, G. (2010). Tactics used when searching for digital video. In Proc. of IIiX '10 (pp. 255--264). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. The Zettabyte Era. Cisco Visual Networking Index White Paper, 2012. http://cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns341/ns525/ns537/ns705/ns827/VNI_Hyperconnectivity_WP.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Panopticon: a parallel video overview system

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UIST '13: Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
      October 2013
      558 pages
      ISBN:9781450322683
      DOI:10.1145/2501988

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 October 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      UIST '13 Paper Acceptance Rate62of317submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

      Upcoming Conference

      UIST '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader