skip to main content
10.1145/2507157.2507180acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Location-aware music recommendation using auto-tagging and hybrid matching

Published:12 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

We propose a novel approach to context-aware music recommendation - recommending music suited for places of interest (POIs). The suggested hybrid approach combines two techniques -- one based on representing both POIs and music with tags, and the other based on the knowledge of the semantic relations between the two types of items. We show that our approach can be scaled up using a novel music auto-tagging technique and we compare it in a live user study to: two non-hybrid solutions, either based on tags or on semantic relations; and to a context-free but personalized recommendation approach. In the considered scenario, i.e., a situation defined by a context (the POI), we show that personalization (via music preference) is not sufficient and it is important to implement effective adaptation techniques to the user's context. In fact, we show that the users are more satisfied with the recommendations generated by combining the tag-based and knowledge-based context adaptation techniques, which exploit orthogonal types of relations between places and music tracks.

References

  1. G. Adomavicius, B. Mobasher, F. Ricci, and A. Tuzhilin. Context-aware recommender systems. AI Magazine, 32(3):67--80, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. A. Ankolekar and T. Sandholm. Foxtrot: a soundtrack for where you are. In Proceedings of Interacting with Sound Workshop: Exploring Context-Aware, Local and Social Audio Applications, pages 26--31, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J.-J. Aucouturier and F. Pachet. Improving Timbre Similarity: How High is the Sky? Journal of Negative Results in Speech and Audio Sciences, 1(1):1--13, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. L. Baltrunas, T. Makcinskas, and F. Ricci. Group recommendations with rank aggregation and collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys), pages 119--126, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. Bizer, T. Heath, and T. Berners-Lee. Linked data - the story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 5(3):1--22, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M. Braunhofer, M. Kaminskas, and F. Ricci. Location-aware music recommendation. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval, 2(1):31--44, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ò. Celma. Music Recommendation and Discovery in the Long Tail. PhD thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ò. Celma and P. Lamere. If you like radiohead, you might like this article. AI Magazine, 32(3):57--66, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. E. Coviello, A. B. Chan, and G. Lanckriet. Time Series Models for Semantic Music Annotation. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 19(5):1343--1359, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. C. Dwork, R. Kumar, M. Naor, and D. Sivakumar. Rank aggregation methods for the web. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web (WWW), pages 613--622, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. I. Fernández-Tobías, I. Cantador, M. Kaminskas, and F. Ricci. Knowledge-based music retrieval for places of interest. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Music Information Retrieval with User-Centered and Multimodal Strategies (MIRUM), pages 19--24, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. Kaminskas and F. Ricci. Contextual Music Information Retrieval and Recommendation: State of the Art and Challenges. Computer Science Review, 6:89--119, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. J. H. Kim, B. Tomasik, and D. Turnbull. Using Artist Similarity to Propagate Semantic Information. In Proceedings of the 10th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 375--380, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. E. Law, L. Von Ahn, R. Dannenberg, and M. Crawford. Tagatune: A game for music and sound annotation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 361--364, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. I. Mandel and D. P. W. Ellis. A Web-Based Game for Collecting Music Metadata. Journal of New Music Research, 37(2):151--165, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. I. Mandel, R. Pascanu, D. Eck, Y. Bengio, L. M. Aiello, R. Schifanella, and F. Menczer. Contextual Tag Inference. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications, 7S(1):1--18, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. R. Miotto, L. Barrington, and G. Lanckriet. Improving Auto-tagging by Modeling Semantic Co-occurrences. In Proceedings of the 11th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. S. Reddy and J. Mascia. Lifetrak: music in tune with your life. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Human-centered Multimedia (HCM), pages 25--34, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. K. Seyerlehner, M. Schedl, P. Knees, and R. Sonnleitner. A Refined Block-Level Feature Set for Classification, Similarity and Tag Prediction. Extended Abstract to the Music Information Retrieval Evaluation eXchange (MIREX), 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. K. Seyerlehner, M. Schedl, T. Pohle, and P. Knees. Using block-level features for genre classification, tag classification and music similarity estimation. Extended Abstract to the Music Information Retrieval Evaluation eXchange (MIREX), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. K. Seyerlehner, G. Widmer, M. Schedl, and P. Knees. Automatic Music Tag Classification based on Block-Level Features. In Proceedings of the 7th Sound and Music Computing Conference (SMC), pages 126--133, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. P. Smolensky. Information Processing in Dynamical Systems: Foundations of Harmony Theory. In Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, pages 194--281, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. M. Sordo. Semantic Annotation of Music Collections: A Computational Approach. PhD thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. D. Turnbull, L. Barrington, and G. Lanckriet. Five approaches to collecting tags for music. In Proceedings of the 9th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), pages 225--230, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. G. Tzanetakis and P. Cook. Musical Genre Classification of Audio Signals. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 10(5):293--302, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. M. Zentner, D. Grandjean, and K. R. Scherer. Emotions evoked by the sound of music: Characterization, classification, and measurement. Emotion, 8(4):494--521, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Location-aware music recommendation using auto-tagging and hybrid matching

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        RecSys '13: Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems
        October 2013
        516 pages
        ISBN:9781450324090
        DOI:10.1145/2507157
        • General Chairs:
        • Qiang Yang,
        • Irwin King,
        • Qing Li,
        • Program Chairs:
        • Pearl Pu,
        • George Karypis

        Copyright © 2013 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 October 2013

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        RecSys '13 Paper Acceptance Rate32of136submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate254of1,295submissions,20%

        Upcoming Conference

        RecSys '24
        18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
        October 14 - 18, 2024
        Bari , Italy

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader