skip to main content
10.1145/2508222.2508225acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

UAV fleet area coverage with network connectivity constraint

Authors Info & Claims
Published:03 November 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) is an aircraft without onboard human pilot, which motion can be remotely and / or autonomously controlled. Using multiple UAVs, i.e. a fleet, offers various advantages compared to the single UAV scenario, such as longer mission duration, bigger mission area or the load balancing of the mission payload. For collaboration purposes, it is assumed that the UAVs are equipped with ad hoc communication capabilities and thus form a special case of mobile ad hoc networks. However, the coordination of one or more fleets of UAVs, in order to fulfill collaborative missions, raises multiples issues in particular when UAVs are required to act in an autonomous fashion. Thus, we propose a decentralised and localised algorithm to control the mobility of the UAVs. This algorithm is designed to perform surveillance missions with network connectivity constraints, which are required in most practical use cases for security purposes as any UAV should be able to be contacted at any moment in case of an emergency. The connectivity is maintained via a tree-based overlay network, which root is the base station of the mission, and created by predicting the future positions of one-hop neighbours. This algorithm is compared to the state of the art contributions by introducing new quality metrics to quantify different aspect of the area coverage process (speed, exhaustivity and fairness). Numerical results obtained via simulations show that the maintenance of the connectivity has a slight negative impact on the coverage performances while the connectivity performances are significantly better.

References

  1. P. Baruah, R. Urgaonkar, and B. Krishnamachari. Learning-enforced time domain routing to mobile sinks in wireless sensor fields. In Proc. of IEEE EmNetS-I, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Basagni, A. Carosi, E. Melachrinoudis, C. Petrioli, and Z. M. Wang. Controlled sink mobility for prolonging wireless sensor networks lifetime. Wirel. Netw., 14:831--858, December 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. E. Besada-Portas, L. de la Torre, J. M. de la Cruz, and B. de Andrés-Toro. Evolutionary trajectory planner for multiple uavs in realistic scenarios. Trans. Rob., 26:619--634, August 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Blum, A. Eskandarian, and L. Hoffman. Mobility management in ivc networks. In Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2003. Proceedings. IEEE, pages 150--155, june 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. E. Ekici, Y. Gu, and D. Bozdag. Topics in ad hoc networks mobility-based communication in wireless sensor networks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Gandham, M. Dawande, R. Prakash, and S. Venkatesan. Energy efficient schemes for wireless sensor networks with multiple mobile base stations. In GLOBECOM '03, volume 1, pages 377--381 Vol.1, dec. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. Kansal, A. A. Somasundara, D. D. Jea, M. B. Srivastava, and D. Estrin. Intelligent fluid infrastructure for embedded networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services, MobiSys '04, pages 111--124, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. E. Kuiper and S. Nadjm-tehrani. Mobility models for uav group reconnaissance applications. In in Proceedings of International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications, IEEE Computer Society. IEEE, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. V. P. Mhatre, S. Member, C. Rosenberg, D. Kofman, R. Mazumdar, N. Shroff, S. Member, S. Member, and S. Member. A minimum cost heterogeneous sensor network with a lifetime constraint. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 4:4--15, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Y. Pigné, A. Dutot, F. Guinand, and D. Olivier. Graphstream: A tool for bridging the gap between complex systems and dynamic graphs. CoRR, abs/0803.2093, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. R. C. Shah, S. Roy, S. Jain, and W. Brunette. Data mules: Modeling a three-tier architecture for sparse sensor networks. Technical Report IRS-TR-03-001, Intel Research, January 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. P. Siripongwutikorn and B. Thipakorn. Mobility-aware topology control in mobile ad hoc networks. Computer Communications, 31(14):3521--3532, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. UAV fleet area coverage with network connectivity constraint

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                MobiWac '13: Proceedings of the 11th ACM international symposium on Mobility management and wireless access
                November 2013
                168 pages
                ISBN:9781450323550
                DOI:10.1145/2508222

                Copyright © 2013 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 3 November 2013

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                MobiWac '13 Paper Acceptance Rate21of68submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate83of272submissions,31%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader