skip to main content
10.1145/2512938.2512946acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescosnConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Social resilience in online communities: the autopsy of friendster

Published:07 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

We empirically analyze five online communities: Friendster, Livejournal, Facebook, Orkut, and Myspace, to study how social networks decline. We define social resilience as the ability of a community to withstand changes. We do not argue about the cause of such changes, but concentrate on their impact. Changes may cause users to leave, which may trigger further leaves of others who lost connection to their friends. This may lead to cascades of users leaving. A social network is said to be resilient if the size of such cascades can be limited. To quantify resilience, we use the k-core analysis, to identify subsets of the network in which all users have at least k friends. These connections generate benefits (b) for each user, which have to outweigh the costs (c) of being a member of the network. If this difference is not positive, users leave. After all cascades, the remaining network is the k-core of the original network determined by the cost-to-benefit (c/b) ratio. By analysing the cumulative distribution of k-cores we are able to calculate the number of users remaining in each community. This allows us to infer the impact of the c/b ratio on the resilience of these online communities. We find that the different online communities have different k-core distributions. Consequently, similar changes in the c/b ratio have a different impact on the amount of active users. Further, our resilience analysis shows that the topology of a social network alone cannot explain its success of failure. As a case study, we focus on the evolution of Friendster. We identify time periods when new users entering the network observed an insufficient c/b ratio. This measure can be seen as a precursor of the later collapse of the community. Our analysis can be applied to estimate the impact of changes in the user interface, which may temporarily increase the c/b ratio, thus posing a threat for the community to shrink, or even to collapse.

References

  1. W. Adger. Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Y.-Y. Ahn, S. Han, H. Kwak, S. Moon, and H. Jeong. Analysis of topological characteristics of huge online social networking services. In WWW '07, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. Backstrom, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, and X. Lan. Group formation in large social networks. In KDD '06, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. F. Benevenuto, T. Rodrigues, M. Cha, and V. Almeida. Characterizing user behavior in online social networks. In IMC '09, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. K. Bhawalkar, J. Kleinberg, K. Lewi, T. Roughgarden, and A. Sharma. Preventing unraveling in social networks: the anchored k-core problem. In ICALP'12, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. Budak and R. Agrawal. On Participation in Group Chats on Twitter. In WWW'13, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Cha, A. Mislove, and K. P. Gummadi. A measurement-driven analysis of information propagation in the flickr social network. In WWW '09, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. H. Chun, H. Kwak, Y.-H. Eom, Y.-Y. Ahn, S. Moon, and H. Jeong. Comparison of online social relations in volume vs interaction. In IMC '08, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Clauset, C. R. Shalizi, and M. E. J. Newman. Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data. SIAM Review, 51(4):661, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. G. Dror, D. Pelleg, O. Rokhlenko, and I. Szpektor. Churn prediction in new users of Yahoo! answers. In WWW '12 Companion, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. Gaito, M. Zignani, G. P. Rossi, A. Sala, X. Zhao, H. Zheng, and B. Y. Zhao. On the bursty evolution of online social networks. In HotSocial '12, pages 1--8, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. Garas, D. Garcia, M. Skowron, and F. Schweitzer. Emotional persistence in online chatting communities. Scientific Reports, 2:402, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. A. Garas, F. Schweitzer, and S. Havlin. A k-shell decomposition method for weighted networks. New Journal of Physics, 14:083030, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. D. Garcia, F. Mendez, U. Serdült, and F. Schweitzer. Political polarization and popularity in online participatory media. In PLEAD '12, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Giles. A world of connections - A special report on social networking. The Economist, Jan 28th, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. M. Gupte and T. Eliassi-Rad. Measuring tie strength in implicit social networks. In WebSci '12, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Harkins. Network Games with Perfect Complements. Warwick University Draft, unpublished.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. O. Herrera and T. Znati. Modeling Churn in P2P Networks. In ANSS '07, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. B. A. Huberman. Big data deserve a bigger audience. Nature, 482(7385):308, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. M. Johnson, S. Egelman, and S. M. Bellovin. Facebook and Privacy : It's Complicated. In Symposium on Usable Privace and Security, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. R. Kairam, D. J. Wang, and J. Leskovec. The life and death of online groups. In WSDM '12, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J. Kawale, A. Pal, and J. Srivastava. Churn Prediction in MMORPGs: A Social Influence Based Approach. In ICCSE '09, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. M. Kitsak, L. K. Gallos, S. Havlin, F. Liljeros, L. Muchnik, H. E. Stanley, and H. A. Makse. Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks. Nature Physics, 6(11):888--893, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. J. Kleinberg. Analysis of large-scale social and information networks. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society A, 371, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. F. Kooti, K. P. Gummadi, and W. A. Mason. The Emergence of Conventions in Online Social Networks. In ICWSM '12, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. J. Leskovec and E. Horvitz. Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network. In WWW '08, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Y. Liu, K. P. Gummadi, B. Krishnamurthy, and A. Mislove. Analyzing facebook privacy settings. In IMC '11, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Y. Liu, B. Viswanath, M. Mondal, K. P. Gummadi, and A. Mislove. Simplifying friendlist management. In WWW '12 Companion, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. A. Mislove, M. Marcon, K. P. Gummadi, P. Druschel, and B. Bhattacharjee. Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In IMC '07, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. L. Muchnik, S. Pei, L. C. Parra, S. D. S. Reis, J. S. Andrade, S. Havlin, and H. A. Makse. Origins of power-law degree distribution in the heterogeneity of human activity in social networks. Scientific reports, 3:1783, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. H. Park and S. Moon. Sampling Bias in User Attribute Estimation of OSNs. In WWW '13 companion, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. R. Pastor-Satorras and A. Vespignani. Epidemic dynamics in finite size scale-free networks. Physical Review E, 65(3):1--4, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. M. P. H. Stumpf and M. A. Porter. Critical truths about power laws. Science, 335(6069):665--6, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. J. L. Toole, M. Cha, and M. C. González. Modeling the adoption of innovations in the presence of geographic and media influences. PloS one, 7(1):e29528, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. B. Viswanath, A. Mislove, M. Cha, and K. P. Gummadi. On the evolution of user interaction in Facebook. In WOSN '09, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. C. Wilson, B. Boe, A. Sala, K. P. Puttaswamy, and B. Y. Zhao. User interactions in social networks and their implications. In EuroSys '09, page 205, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. S. Wu, A. Das Sarma, A. Fabrikant, S. Lattanzi, and A. Tomkins. Arrival and departure dynamics in social networks. In WSDM '13, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. E. Zheleva, H. Sharara, and L. Getoor. Co-evolution of social and affiliation networks. In KDD '09, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Social resilience in online communities: the autopsy of friendster

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      COSN '13: Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Online social networks
      October 2013
      254 pages
      ISBN:9781450320849
      DOI:10.1145/2512938

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 October 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      COSN '13 Paper Acceptance Rate22of138submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate69of307submissions,22%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader