skip to main content
research-article

Embodying Care in Matilda: An Affective Communication Robot for Emotional Wellbeing of Older People in Australian Residential Care Facilities

Published:01 December 2013Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Ageing population is at the center of the looming healthcare crisis in most parts of the developed and developing world. Australia, like most of the western world, is bracing up for the looming ageing population crisis, spiraling healthcare costs, and expected serious shortage of healthcare workers. Assistive service and companion (social) robots are being seen as one of the ways for supporting aged care facilities to meet this challenge and improve the quality of care of older people including mental and physical health outcomes, as well as to support healthcare workers in personalizing care. In this article, the authors report on the design and implementation of first-ever field trials of Matilda, a human-like assistive communication (service and companion) robot for improving the emotional well-being of older people in three residential care facilities in Australia involving 70 participants. The research makes several unique contributions including Matilda’s ability to break technology barriers, positively engage older people in group and one-to-one activities, making these older people productive and useful, helping them become resilient and cope better through personalization of care, and finally providing them sensory enrichment through Matilda’s multimodal communication capabilities.

References

  1. ABS. 2010a. 3235.0 - Population by age and sex, regions of Australia. Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/DetailsPage/3235.02010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ABS. 2010b. 3201.0 - Population by age and sex, Australian states and territories. Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/[email protected]/Lookup/3201.0Main+Features1Jun%202010?OpenDocument.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, T. and Moyle, W. 2007. Transitions in ageing: A focus on dementia care nursing. In Solution-Focused Nursing: Rethinking Practice, M. McAllister Ed., Palgrave, Macmillan, 154--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian Department of Health. 2007. The state of our public hospitals, June 2007 report. http://www.health.gov.au.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Australian Department of Health. 2010a. Module one: Understanding emotional wellbeing. http://www.health.vic.gov.au/agedcare/downloads/wellforlife/ewb_resi_section5_mod1.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Australian Department of Health. 2010b. Person-centred practice: Best care for older people everywhere. Victorian Government Health Information. http://www.health.vic.gov.au/older/toolkit/02PersonCentredPractice/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bahadori, S., Cesta, A., Grisetti, G., Iocchi, L., Leone, R., Nardi, D., Oddi, A., Pecora, F., and Rasconi, R. 2003. Robocare: An integrated robotic system for the domestic care of the elderly. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Ambient Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartneck, C., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., and Hagita, N. 2007. Is the uncanny valley an uncanny cliff? In Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. 368--373.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Beck, A., Katcher, A., and Thomas, E. M. 1996. Between Pets and People: The Importance of Animal Companionship. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, IN.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Broekens, J., Heerink, M., and Rosendal, H. 2009. Assistive social robots in older persons care: A review. Gerontechnol. 8, 2, 94--103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Buckley, K. M., Tran, B. Q., and Prandoni, C. M. 2004. Receptiveness, use and acceptance of telehealth by caregivers of stroke patients in the home. Online J. Issues Nurs. 9, 3, 9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Chaudhury, H. and Rowles, G., Eds. 2005. Between the shores of recollection and imagination: Self, aging and home. In Home and Identity in Late Life: International Perspectives, Springer, New York, 3--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen-Mansfield, J., Parpura-Gill, A., and Golander, H. 2006. Utilization of self-identity roles for designing interventions for persons with dementia. J. Gerontol. Psychol. Sci. 61, 4, 202--212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Cooper, R., Larsson, S., Matheson, C., Poesio, M., and Traum, D. 1998. Coding instructional dialogue for information states. The Trindi Project. http://www.ling.gu.se/research/projects/trindi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. 1978a. Facial Action Coding System (FACS): Manual. Consulting Psychologists Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. 1978b. The Facial Action Coding System: A Technique for the Measurement of Facial Movement. Consulting Psychologists Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Field, A. P. 2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. SAGE Publications Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Foerst, A. 2004. God in the Machine: What Robots Teach Us about Humanity and God. Dutton. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Goetz, J. and Kiesler, S. 2002. Cooperation with a robotic assistant. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’02). 578--579. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Graf, B., Hans, M., and Schraft, R. D. 2004. Care-O-bot II---Development of a next generation robotic home assistant. Auton. Robot. 16, 2, 193--205. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Hanson, D. 2006. Exploring the aesthetic range of humanoid robot. In Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Workshop on Android Science (CogSci’06). 16--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanson, D., Baurmann, S., Riccio, T., Margolin, R., Dockins, T., Tavares, M., and Carpenter, K. 2009. Zeno: A cognitive character. http://www.aaai.org/Papers/Workshops/2008/WS-08-08/WS08-08-003.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jaimes, A. and Sebe, N. 2007. Multimodal human--computer interaction: A survey. J. Comput. Vision Image Understand. 108, 1--2, 116--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kaneko, K., Kanehiro, F., Morisawa, M., Miura, K., Nakaoka, S., and Kajita, S. 2009. Cybernetic human HRP-4C. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots. 7--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Katcher, A. and Wilkins, G. 1993. Dialogue with animals: Its nature and culture. In The Biophilia Hypothesis, S. R. Kellert and E. O. Wilson Eds., Island Press, 173--197.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kazerooni, H. 2005. Exoskeletons for human power augmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 3459--3464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Kazerooni, H., Racine, J.-L., Huang, L., and Steger, R. 2005. On the control of the Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (BLEEX). In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 4353--4360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kidd, C. D. and Breazeal, C. 2007. A robotic weight loss coach. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Kitwood, T. M. 1997. Dementia Reconsidered: The Person Comes First. Open University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Lang, P. J. 1995. The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention. Am. Psychol. 50, 5, 372--385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Lee, C. M. and Narayanan, S. S. 2005. Toward detecting emotions in spoken dialogs. IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 13, 2, 293--303.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Levy, B. R., Slade, M. D., Kunkel, S. R., and Kasl, S. V. 2002. Longevity increased by positive self-perceptions of aging. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83, 2, 261--270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Libin, A. V. and Libin, E. V. 2004. Person robot interactions from the robopsychologists’ point of view: The robotic psychology and robotherapy approach. Proc. IEEE 92, 11, 1789--1803.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Lisetti, C. and LeRouge, C. 2004. Affective computing in tele-home health. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Lisetti, C., Nasoz, F., LeRouge, C., Ozyer, O., and Alvarez, K. 2003. Developing multimodal intelligent affective interfaces for tele-home health care. Int. Hum. Comput. Stud. 59, 1--2, 245--255. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Liu, C., Ishi, C. T., Ishiguro, H., and Hagita, N. 2012. Generation of nodding, head tilting and eye gazing for human-robot dialogue interaction. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI’12). 285--292. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Lynn, M. R. 1986. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs. Res. 35, 6, 382--385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. McCormack, B. 2001. Negotiating Partnership with Older People-A Person-Centred Approach. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Miyawaki, K., Sano, M., Sasama, R., Yamaguchi, T., and Yamada, K. 2009. Adaptive embodied entrainment control and interaction design of the first meeting introducer robot. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 430--435. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Naish, J. 1987. 21st century nurse. Nurs. Stand. 24, 8, Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain), 22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Niu, Y., Zhu, X., and Hirst, G. 2006. Using outcome polarity in sentence extraction for medical question-answering. In Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Symposium. 599--603.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Connor, D., Phinney, A., Smith, A., Small, J., Purves, B., Perry, J., Drance, E., Donnelly, M., Chaudhury, H., and Beattle, L. 2007. Personhood in dementia care: Developing a research agenda for broadening the vision. Dementia 6, 1, 121--144.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Picard, R. W. 2000. Affective Computing. The MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Pineau, J., Montemerlo, M., Pollack, M., Roy, N., and Thrun, S. 2003. Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: Challenges and results. Robot. Auton. Syst. 42, 3--4, 271--281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Pollack, M. E., Brown, L., Colbry, D., Orosz, C., Peintner, B., Ramakrishnan, S., Engberg, S., Matthews, J. T., Dunbar-Jacob, J., McCarthy, C. E., Thrun, S., Montemerlo, M., Pineau, J., and Roy, N. 2002. Pearl: A mobile robotic assistant for the elderly. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Automation as Caregiver: The Role of Intelligent Technology in Elder Care (AAAI).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Rashidi, P., Cook, D. J., Holder, L. B., and Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. 2011. Discovering activities to recognize and track in a smart environment. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 23. 4, 527--539. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., Rashidi, P., Cook, D. J., and Holder, L. To appear. Discovering and tracking activities for assisted living. Am. J. Geriatric Psych.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Stiehl, W. D., Lieberman, J., Breazeal, C., Basel, L., Cooper, R., Knight, H., Lalla, L., Maymin, A., and Purchase, S. 2006a. The huggable: A therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference. 1290--1291.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Stiehl, W. D., Lieberman, J., Breazeal, C., Basel, L., Lalla, L., and Wolf, M. 2006b. The design of the huggable: A therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Caring Machines, AI in Eldercare.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Tapus, A., Matarić, M. J., and Scassellati B. 2007. Social assistive robotics: The grand challenges in helping humans through social interaction. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. Special issue on Grand Challenges in Robotics. 35--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Tinney, J., Fearn, M., Hill, K., Dow, B., Haralambous, B., and Bremner, F. 2007. Best practice in person-centred health care for older Victorians: Report of phase 1. Report to the Victorian Department of Human Services, National Ageing Research Institute.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. van der Geest, S. 2002. Respect and reciprocity: Care of elderly people in rural Ghana. J. Cross Cult. Gerontol. 17, 1, 3--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. van der Geest, S., Mul, A., and Vermeulen, H. 2004. Linkages between migration and the care of frail older people: Observations from Greece, Ghana and the Netherlands. Age. Soc. 24, 3, 431--450.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Wada, K. and Shibata, T. 2007. Living with seal robots---Its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Trans. Robot. 23, 5, 972--980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Wada, K., Shibata, T., Saito, T., and Tanie, K. 2002. Analysis of factors that bring mental effects to elderly people in robot assisted activity. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS’02). 1152--1157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Wöllmer, M., Metallinou, A., Eyben, F., Schuller, B., and Narayanan, S. S. 2010. Context-sensitive multimodal emotion recognition from speech and facial expression using bidirectional LSTM modeling. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. 2632--2365.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Yamaguchi, T., Sasama, R., and Yamada, K. 2009. Design and concept of network robots as social agents to motivate elderly people. In Proceedings of the IROS Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Embodying Care in Matilda: An Affective Communication Robot for Emotional Wellbeing of Older People in Australian Residential Care Facilities

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems
          ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems  Volume 4, Issue 4
          Special Issue on Informatics for Smart Health and Wellbeing
          December 2013
          124 pages
          ISSN:2158-656X
          EISSN:2158-6578
          DOI:10.1145/2555810
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 December 2013
          • Accepted: 1 October 2013
          • Revised: 1 September 2013
          • Received: 1 December 2012
          Published in tmis Volume 4, Issue 4

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader