skip to main content
10.1145/2559206.2581136acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Mobile and computer-based talent assessments: implications of workload and usability

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Some organizations have begun to implement more unproctored mobile talent assessment methods in addition to traditional computer-based assessment, requiring new human-computer interaction constructs, methods, and approaches. Usability testing and assessments of user satisfaction and mental workload and the technology's effectiveness and efficiency are critical before implementing new methods of assessments. Initial results of this study provide some initial positive implications for organizations to adopt the use of well-designed mobile-based talent assessments.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Tippins, N. T. Internet alternatives to traditional proctored testing: Where are we now? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 2, 1 (2009), 2--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Golubovich, J., & Boyce, A.S. Hiring tests: Trends in mobile device usage. In A.J. Illingworth (Chair) Mobile Devices in Talent Assessment: Where Are We Now? Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2013, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Home broadband 2013. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/ 2013/Broadband.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Cell internet use 2012. http://www.pewinternet.org/ Reports/2012/Cell-Internet-Use-2012.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Mobile access 2010. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/ 2010/Mobile-Access-2010/Summary-ofFindings.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. ISO 9241. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Ergonomics of Human System Interaction, 1992, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Shneiderman, B., & Plaisant, C. Designing the User Interface (5th Ed.) Reading, MA: AddisonWesley Publishing Company, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Buskirk, T.D., & Andrus, C. Online surveys aren't just for computers anymore! Exploring potential mode effects between smartphone and computer-based online surveys. Survey Research Methods Section, American Statistical Association, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Nielsen, J.M. Mobile Usability Update (2011). http://www.nngroup.com/articles/mobileusability-update/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Peytchev, A., Couper, M.P., McCabe, S.D. Crawford, S.E. Web survey design: Paging versus scrolling. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70 (2006), 596--607.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Tourangeau, R., Couper, M.P., & Conrad, F. Spacing, position, and order -- Interpretive heuristics for visual features of survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68 (2004), 368--393.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Amazon.com, Inc. (2005--2014). Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk). https://www.mturk.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Landers, R. N., Reddock, C. M., Cavanaugh, K. J. & Proaps, A. B. Talent assessment using mobile devices. In T. Kantrowitz & C. M. Reddock (Chairs), Shaping the future of mobile assessment: Research and practice update. Symposium presented at the 29th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. Development of a multi-dimensional workload rating scale: Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 1988, 139--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Chin, J. P., Diehl, V. A. & Norman, K. L. Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. SIGCHI '88 (1988), 213--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Mobile and computer-based talent assessments: implications of workload and usability

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI EA '14: CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            April 2014
            2620 pages
            ISBN:9781450324748
            DOI:10.1145/2559206

            Copyright © 2014 Owner/Author

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 26 April 2014

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • poster

            Acceptance Rates

            CHI EA '14 Paper Acceptance Rate1,000of3,200submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

            Upcoming Conference

            CHI '24
            CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            May 11 - 16, 2024
            Honolulu , HI , USA

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader