skip to main content
10.1145/2598153.2598159acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaviConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ArtVis: combining advanced visualisation and tangible interaction for the exploration, analysis and browsing of digital artwork collections

Published:27 May 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present ArtVis, an application combining advanced visualisation techniques and tangible interaction to explore a large digital collection of almost 28 000 European artworks managed by the Web Gallery of Art. In order to get new insights by exploring, analysing and browsing the artworks, our graphical ArtVis user interface offers three complementary but synchronised visualisation components. We further developed a tangible ArtVis user interface for the playful exploration and seamless integration of the digital artwork collection with physical artefacts. A formative evaluation of the ArtVis prototype revealed that users are able to answer relatively difficult questions as well as get some new insights based on the vast amount of data. A second user evaluation of the tangible ArtVis interface has shown that this sort of physical interaction attracts users and stimulates them to further explore the digital artwork collection.

References

  1. A. Amin, M. Hildebrand, J. van Ossenbruggen, and L. Hardman. Designing a Thesaurus-based Comparison Search Interface for Linked Cultural Heritage Sources. In Proceedings of IUI 2010, International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Hong Kong, China, February 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. G. Ciocca, P. Olivo, and R. Schettini. Browsing Museum Image Collections on a Multi-Touch Table. Information Systems, 37(2), April 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Greenberg and C. Fitchett. Phidgets: Easy Development of Physical Interfaces Through Physical Widgets. In Proceedings of UIST 2001, 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Orlando, USA, November 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Heer, S. K. Card, and J. A. Landay. Prefuse: A Toolkit for Interactive Information Visualization. In Proceedings of CHI 2005, ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, USA, April 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. U. Hinrichs, H. Schmidt, and S. Carpendale. EMDialog: Bringing Information Visualization Into the Museum. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14(6), November 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Hinton and M. Whitelaw. Exploring the Digital Commons: An Approach to the Visualisation of Large Heritage Datasets. In Proceedings of EVA 2010, International Conference on Electronic Visualisation & the Arts, London, UK, July 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. A. Keim. Information Visualization and Visual Data Mining. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 8(1), January 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. H. Lam, E. Bertini, P. Isenberg, C. Plaisant, and S. Carpendale. Empirical Studies in Information Visualization: Seven Scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(99), September 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. B. Laugwitz, T. Held, and M. Schrepp. Construction and Evaluation of a User Experience Questionnaire. HCI and Usability for Education and Work, 5298, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. B. Lee, P. Isenberg, N. H. Riche, and S. Carpendale. Beyond Mouse and Keyboard: Expanding Design Considerations for Information Visualization Interactions. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12), December 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. T. Nørretranders. The User Illusion: Cutting Consciousness Down to Size. Viking, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Nunes, S. Greenberg, and C. Neustaedter. Sharing Digital Photographs in the Home Through Physical Mementos, Souvenirs, and Keepsakes. In Proceedings of DIS 2008, International Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, Cape Town, South Africa, April 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Ossenbruggen, A. Amin, L. Hardman, M. Hildebrand, B. van Assem, B. Omelayenko, G. Schreiber, A. Tordai, V. de Boer, B. Wielinga, J. Wielemaker, M. de Niet, J. Taekema, M. van Orsouw, and A. Teesing. Searching and Annotating Virtual Heritage Collections with Semantic-Web Techniques. In Proceedings of Museums and the Web 2007, San Francisco, USA, April 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. B. Shneiderman. The Eyes Have It: A Task by Data Type Taxonomy for Information Visualizations. In Proceedings of VL 1996, IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, Boulder, USA, September 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Spindler, C. Tominski, H. Schumann, and R. Dachselt. Tangible Views for Information Visualization. In Proceedings of ITS 2010, ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, November 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Thudt, U. Hinrichs, and S. Carpendale. The Bohemian Bookshelf: Supporting Serendipitous Book Discoveries Through Information Visualization. In Proceedings of CHI 2012, ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Austin, USA, May 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. B. Ullmer and H. Ishii. The metaDESK: Models and Prototypes for Tangible User Interfaces. In Proceedings of UIST 1997, 10th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Banff, Canada, October 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. B. Ullmer, H. Ishii, and R. J. K. Jacob. Tangible Query Interfaces: Physically Constrained Tokens for Manipulating Database Queries. In Proceedings of Interact 2003, Zurich, Switzerland, September 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Y. Wang, N. Stash, L. Aroyo, P. Gorgels, L. Rutledge, and G. Schreiber. Recommendations Based on Semantically Enriched Museum Collections. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 6(4), November 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. K.-P. Yee, K. Swearingen, K. Li, and M. Hearst. Faceted Metadata for Image Search and Browsing. In Proceedings of CHI 2003, ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Fort Lauderdale, USA, April 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. ArtVis: combining advanced visualisation and tangible interaction for the exploration, analysis and browsing of digital artwork collections

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AVI '14: Proceedings of the 2014 International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces
      May 2014
      438 pages
      ISBN:9781450327756
      DOI:10.1145/2598153

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 May 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      AVI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate32of112submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate107of408submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader