skip to main content
10.1145/2601248.2601298acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseaseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An empirical investigation on MPI open source applications

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 May 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Parallel programming is a computing paradigm that gains more and more adopters each year. Embracing parallel programming means in most of the cases the usage of a particular library that allows to add parallelism and concurrency to applications. Unfortunately there still is little knowledge about how parallel libraries are used in practice and without such information it is quite hard to promote them, for example, in terms of the importance of their provided functionalities. In this paper we focus on the usages of MPI, one of the most popular model facilitating parallel programming. By addressing research questions regarding the usage of MPI constructs as well as the structural complexity of MPI open source applications we aim to encourage new developers to embrace MPI, as well as to consider adopting open source systems which rely on MPI.

References

  1. John Businge, Alexander Serebrenik, and Mark van den Brand. Analyzing the Eclipse API usage: Putting the developer in the loop. 15th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Spinellis Diomidis and Giannikas Vaggelis. Open source adoption in large us companies. 4th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. The MPI Forum. MPI: A message passing interface, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Lanza and R. Marinescu. Object-Oriented Metrics in Practice. Springer Verlag, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Wei Li and Raed Shatnawi. An empirical study of the bad smells and class error probability in the post-release object-oriented system evolution. Journal of Systems and Software, 80, July 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. Marinescu, R. Marinescu, P. F. Mihancea, D. Raţiu, and R. Wettel. iPlasma: An integrated platform for quality assessment of object-oriented design. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM Industrial and Tool Volume), Budapest, Hungary. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Radu Marinescu and Cristina Marinescu. Are the clients of flawed classes (also) defect prone? In Proc. IEEE International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM), Williamsburg, USA. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. T. J. McCabe. A Complexity Measure. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2(4):308--320, dec 1976. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. NVIDIA. Web page: http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_home_new.html, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Semih Okur and Danny Dig. How do developers use parallel libraries? In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT 20th International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Steffen M. Olbrich, Daniela S. Cruzes, and Dag I. K. Sjberg. Are all code smells harmful? a study of god classes and brain classes in the evolution of three open source systems. In IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Web page: http://www.R-project.org, 2010. ISBN 3-900051-07-0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. David J. Sheskin. Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures, 4th edition. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. C. Teyton, J. R. Falleri, M. Palyart, and X. Blanc. A study of library migration in java software. CoRR, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Weslley Torres, Gustavo Pinto, Benito Fernandes, JoÃčo Paulo Oliveira, Filipe Alencar Ximenes, and Fernando Castor. Are java programmers transitioning to multicore?: a large scale study of java FLOSS. In SPLASH Workshops, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Richard Wettel and Radu Marinescu. Archeology of code duplication: Recovering duplication chains from small duplication fragments. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing (SYNASC 2005), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rui Xin, Zhengwei Qi, Shiqiu Huang, Chengcheng Xiang, Yudi Zheng, Yin Wang, and Haibing Guan. An automation-assisted empirical study on lock usage for concurrent programs. In 29th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Robert K. Yin. Case Study Research: Design and Methods., 3rd edition. SAGE Publications, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Thomas Zimmermann, Rahul Premraj, and Andreas Zeller. Predicting defects for Eclipse. In Third International Workshop on Predictor Models in Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An empirical investigation on MPI open source applications

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        EASE '14: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering
        May 2014
        486 pages
        ISBN:9781450324762
        DOI:10.1145/2601248

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 May 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate71of232submissions,31%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader