skip to main content
10.1145/2639108.2639143acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

E-eyes: device-free location-oriented activity identification using fine-grained WiFi signatures

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 September 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Activity monitoring in home environments has become increasingly important and has the potential to support a broad array of applications including elder care, well-being management, and latchkey child safety. Traditional approaches involve wearable sensors and specialized hardware installations. This paper presents device-free location-oriented activity identification at home through the use of existing WiFi access points and WiFi devices (e.g., desktops, thermostats, refrigerators, smartTVs, laptops). Our low-cost system takes advantage of the ever more complex web of WiFi links between such devices and the increasingly fine-grained channel state information that can be extracted from such links. It examines channel features and can uniquely identify both in-place activities and walking movements across a home by comparing them against signal profiles. Signal profiles construction can be semi-supervised and the profiles can be adaptively updated to accommodate the movement of the mobile devices and day-to-day signal calibration. Our experimental evaluation in two apartments of different size demonstrates that our approach can achieve over 96% average true positive rate and less than 1% average false positive rate to distinguish a set of in-place and walking activities with only a single WiFi access point. Our prototype also shows that our system can work with wider signal band (802.11ac) with even higher accuracy.

References

  1. Familylink. http://www.familylink.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Leap motion. https://www.leapmotion.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. IEEE Std. 802.11n-2009: Enhancements for higher throughput, 2009. Available at http://www.ieee802.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. F. Adib, Z. Kabelac, D. Katabi, and R. C. Miller. 3d tracking via body radio reflections. In Usenix NSDI, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. F. Adib and D. Katabi. See through walls with wifi! In ACM SIGCOMM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Azizyan, I. Constandache, and R. Roy Choudhury. Surroundsense: mobile phone localization via ambience fingerprinting. In ACM MobiCom, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Bahl and V. N. Padmanabhan. Radar: An in-building rf-based user location and tracking system. In INFOCOM, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. N. Banerjee and et al. Virtual compass: relative positioning to sense mobile social interactions. In Pervasive computing, pages 1--21. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. H.-l. Chang and et al. Spinning beacons for precise indoor localization. In ACM SenSys, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. E. S. Gardner. Exponential smoothing: The state of the art. Journal of forecasting, 4(1):1--28, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. A. Goswami and et al. Wigem: a learning-based approach for indoor localization. In ACM CoNEXT, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. D. Halperin and et al. Tool release: Gathering 802.11n traces with channel state information. ACM SIGCOMM CCR, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Hong and T. Ohtsuki. Ambient intelligence sensing using array sensor: Device-free radio based approach. In CoSDEO workshop, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. K. Joshi, S. Hong, and S. Katti. Pinpoint: Localizing interfering radios. In Usenix NSDI, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. V. Kasteren and et. al. An activity monitoring system for elderly care using generative and discriminative models. Personal and ubiquitous computing, 14(6):489--498, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Keally and et al. Pbn: towards practical activity recognition using smartphone-based body sensor networks. In ACM SenSys, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. K. Kleisouris, Y. Chen, J. Yang, and R. P. Martin. Empirical evaluation of wireless localization when using multiple antennas. IEEE TPDS, 21(11):1595--1610, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. K. Kleisouris, B. Firner, R. Howard, Y. Zhang, and R. P. Martin. Detecting intra-room mobility with signal strength descriptors. In ACM MobiHoc, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. E. Kosba, A. Saeed, and M. Youssef. Rasid: A robust wlan device-free passive motion detection system. In PerCom, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J. Lei, X. Ren, and D. Fox. Fine-grained kitchen activity recognition using rgb-d. In ACM UbiComp, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. L. Li, P. Hu, C. Peng, J. Shen, and F. Zhao. Epsilon: A visible light based positioning system. In Usenix NSDI, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. H. Liu, Y. Gan, J. Yang, S. Sidhom, Y. Wang, Y. Chen, and F. Ye. Push the limit of wifi based localization for smartphones. In ACM MobiCom, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Microsoft. X-box kinect. http://www.xbox.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Philips. Philips lifeline. http://www.lifelinesys.com/content/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Q. Pu and et al. Whole-home gesture recognition using wireless signals. In ACM MobCom, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. L. R. Rabiner and B.-H. Juang. Fundamentals of speech recognition, volume 14. PTR Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. P. J. Rousseeuw and A. M. Leroy. Robust regression and outlier detection, volume 589. John Wiley & Sons, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Y. Rubner and S. U. C. S. Dept. Perceptual metrics for image database navigation. Number 1621 in Report STAN-CS-TR. Stanford University, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. M. Seifeldin and et al. Nuzzer: A large-scale device-free passive localization system for wireless environments. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 12(7):1321--1334, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. S. Sen and et al. Spot localization using phy layer information. In ACM MobiSys, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. S. Sigg, S. Shi, and Y. Ji. Rf-based device-free recognition of simultaneously conducted activities. In CoSDEO workshop, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. A. Technology. Grandcare systems. http://www.grandcare.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. G. Ten Holt, M. Reinders, and E. Hendriks. Multi-dimensional dynamic time warping for gesture recognition. In the conference of the Advanced School for Computing and Imaging, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. J. Wang and D. Katabi. Dude, where's my card?: Rfid positioning that works with multipath and nols. In SIGCOMM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. J. Wilson and N. Patwari. Radio tomographic imaging with wireless networks. IEEE Trans. on Mobile Computing, 9(5), 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. W. Xi and et al. Electronic frog eye: Counting crowd using wifi. In INFOCOM, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. J. Xiong and K. Jamieson. Arraytrack: a fine-grained indoor location system. In Usenix NSDI, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. J. Yang and Y. Chen. Indoor localization using improved rss-based lateration methods. In IEEE GLOBECOM 2009, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. J. Yang, Y. Ge, H. Xiong, Y. Chen, and H. Liu. Performing joint learning for passive intrusion detection in pervasive wireless environments. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. J. Yang, J. Lee, and J. Choi. Activity recognition based on rfid object usage for smart mobile devices. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 26(2):239--246, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. S. Yang, P. Dessai, M. Verma, and M. Gerla. Freeloc: Calibration-free crowdsourced indoor localization. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. K. Yatani and K. N. Truong. Bodyscope: a wearable acoustic sensor for activity recognition. In ACM UbiComp, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. M. Youssef and A. Agrawala. The horus wlan location determination system. In ACM MobiSys, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. M. Youssef, M. Mah, and A. Agrawala. Challenges: device-free passive localization for wireless environments. In MobiCom, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Y. Zhao and et al. Radio tomographic imaging and tracking of stationary and moving people via kernel distance. In IEEE IPSN, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. E-eyes: device-free location-oriented activity identification using fine-grained WiFi signatures

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobiCom '14: Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
      September 2014
      650 pages
      ISBN:9781450327831
      DOI:10.1145/2639108

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 September 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      MobiCom '14 Paper Acceptance Rate36of220submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate440of2,972submissions,15%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    ePub

    View this article in ePub.

    View ePub