skip to main content
10.1145/2642803.2642810acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecsawConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Merits of a Meritocracy in Open Source Software Ecosystems

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 August 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Eclipse open source ecosystem has grown from a small internal IBM project to one of the biggest Integrated Development Environments in the market. Open source communities and ecosystems do not follow the standard governance strategies typically used in large organizations. A meritocracy is a frequently occurring form of governance on different levels in open ecosystems. In this paper we investigate how this form of governance influences the health of projects within the Eclipse ecosystem in terms of the amount of commits within each month. We analyzed the hierarchy of Eclipse, how merits are conceptualized within the ecosystem and the effect of the appointments of mentors and project leads on the amount of commits. From our research, we can conclude that this system is not always as fair as it seems; merits are only a benefit in some cases.

References

  1. Aarnoutse, M., Renes, C., & Snijders, R. (2014). Loyalty and Migration of Contributors in Software Ecosystems. Proceedings on workshop Software Ecosystems, Utrecht University..Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard business review, 82(3), 68--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jansen, S. (2013). Measuring the Health of Open Source Software Ecosystems: Moving Beyond the Scope of Project Health.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jansen, S., Finkelstein, A., & Brinkkemper, S. (2009). A sense of community: A research agenda for software ecosystems. In Software engineering-companion volume, 2009. icse-companion 2009. 31st international conference on (pp. 187--190).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kim, A. J. (2000). Community building on the web: Secret strategies for successful online communities. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. O'Mahony, S., & Ferraro, F. (2007). The emergence of governance in an open source community. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1079--1106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Scacchi, W. (2003). Free/open source software development practices in the computer game community.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Merits of a Meritocracy in Open Source Software Ecosystems

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ECSAW '14: Proceedings of the 2014 European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops
            August 2014
            214 pages
            ISBN:9781450327787
            DOI:10.1145/2642803

            Copyright © 2014 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 25 August 2014

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            ECSAW '14 Paper Acceptance Rate29of43submissions,67%Overall Acceptance Rate80of120submissions,67%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader