skip to main content
10.1145/2663716.2663744acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Measuring Price Discrimination and Steering on E-commerce Web Sites

Published:05 November 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Today, many e-commerce websites personalize their content, including Netflix (movie recommendations), Amazon (product suggestions), and Yelp (business reviews). In many cases, personalization provides advantages for users: for example, when a user searches for an ambiguous query such as ``router,'' Amazon may be able to suggest the woodworking tool instead of the networking device. However, personalization on e-commerce sites may also be used to the user's disadvantage by manipulating the products shown (price steering) or by customizing the prices of products (price discrimination). Unfortunately, today, we lack the tools and techniques necessary to be able to detect such behavior.

In this paper, we make three contributions towards addressing this problem. First, we develop a methodology for accurately measuring when price steering and discrimination occur and implement it for a variety of e-commerce web sites. While it may seem conceptually simple to detect differences between users' results, accurately attributing these differences to price discrimination and steering requires correctly addressing a number of sources of noise. Second, we use the accounts and cookies of over 300 real-world users to detect price steering and discrimination on 16 popular e-commerce sites. We find evidence for some form of personalization on nine of these e-commerce sites. Third, we investigate the effect of user behaviors on personalization. We create fake accounts to simulate different user features including web browser/OS choice, owning an account, and history of purchased or viewed products. Overall, we find numerous instances of price steering and discrimination on a variety of top e-commerce sites.

References

  1. L. Andrade and M. J. Silva. Relevance Ranking for Geographic IR. GIR, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Amazon mechanical turk. http://mturk.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. F. Bakalov, M.-J. Meurs, B. König-Ries, B. Satel, R. G. Butler, and A. Tsang. An Approach to Controlling User Models and Personalization Effects in Recommender Systems. IUI, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. K. Bhasin. JCPenney Execs Admit They Didn't Realize How Much Customers Were Into Coupons. Business Insider, 2012. http://www.businessinsider.com/jcpenney-didnt-realize-how-much-customers-were-into-coupons-2012--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. P. Belobaba, A. Odoni, and C. Barnhart. The Global Airline Industry. Wiley, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. C. Chiames. Correspondence with the authors, in reference to a pre-publication version of this manuscript, 2014. http://personalization.ccs.neu.edu/orbitz_letter.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R. Calo. Digital Market Manipulation. The George Washington Law Review, 82, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Das, M. Datar, A. Garg, and S. Rajaram. Google News Personalization: Scalable Online Collaborative Filtering. WWW, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Duhigg. How Companies Learn Your Secrets. The New York Times, 2012. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/19/magazine/shopping-habits.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. P. Diaconis and R. L. Graham. Spearman's Footrule as a Measure of Disarray. J. Roy. Stat. B, 39(2), 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Z. Dou, R. Song, and J.-R. Wen. A Large-scale Evaluation and Analysis of Personalized Search Strategies. WWW, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. H. Dorfman. Economics and Management of the Food Industry. Routledge, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. R. Fagin, R. Kumar, and D. Sivakumar. Comparing top k lists. SODA, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Ghose, P. G. Ipeirotis, and B. Li. Designing Ranking Systems for Hotels on Travel Search Engines by Mining User-Generated and Crowdsourced Content. Marketing Science, 31(3), 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Guha, B. Cheng, and P. Francis. Challenges in Measuring Online Advertising Systems. IMC, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Hannak, P. Sapiezy\'nski, A. M. Kakhki, B. Krishnamurthy, D. Lazer, A. Mislove, and C. Wilson. Measuring Personalization of Web Search. WWW, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Hu, H.-J. Zeng, H. Li, C. Niu, and Z. Chen. Demographic Prediction Based on User's Browsing Behavior. WWW, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. K. J\"arvelin and J. Kek\"al\"ainen. IR evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents. SIGIR, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. K. J\"arvelin and J. Kek\"al\"ainen. Cumulated Gain-based Evaluation of IR Techniques. ACM TOIS, 20(4), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. R. Kumar and S. Vassilvitskii. Generalized Distances Between Rankings. WWW, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. G. Kendall. A New Measure of Rank Correlation. Biometrika, 30(1/2), 1938.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. W. H. Kruskal. Ordinal Measures of Association. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(284), 1958.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. L. Li, W. Chu, J. Langford, and R. E. Schapire. A Contextual-Bandit Approach to Personalized News Article Recommendation. WWW, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. B. D. Lollis. Orbitz: Mac users book fancier hotels than PC users. USA Today Travel Blog, 2012. http://travel.usatoday.com/hotels/post/2012/05/orbitz-hotel-booking-mac-pc-/690633/1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. B. D. Lollis. Orbitz: Mobile searches may yield better hotel deals. USA Today Travel Blog, 2012. http://travel.usatoday.com/hotels/post/2012/05/orbitz-mobile-hotel-deals/691470/1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. A. Majumder and N. Shrivastava. Know your personalization: learning topic level personalization in online services. WWW, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. D. Mattioli. On Orbitz, Mac Users Steered to Pricier Hotels. The Wall Street Journal, 2012. http://on.wsj.com/LwTnPH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. J. Mikians, L. Gyarmati, V. Erramilli, and N. Laoutaris. Detecting Price and Search Discrimination on the Internet. HotNets, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. J. Mikians, L. Gyarmati, V. Erramilli, and N. Laoutaris. Crowd-assisted Search for Price Discrimination in E-Commerce: First results. CoNEXT, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. E. Pariser. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. Penguin Press, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. I. Png. Managerial Economics. Routledge, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. J. Pitkow, H. Schütze, T. Cass, R. Cooley, D. Turnbull, A. Edmonds, E. Adar, and T. Breuel. Personalized search. CACM, 45(9), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Panopticlick. https://panopticlick.eff.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. PhantomJS. 2013. http://phantomjs.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. A. Ramasastry. Web sites change prices based on customers' habits. CNN, 2005. http://edition.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/24/ramasastry.website.prices/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. C. Shapiro and H. R. Varian. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Harvard Business School Press, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. C. Spearman. The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things. Am J Psychol, 15, 1904.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. D. Sculley. Rank Aggregation for Similar Items. SDM, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. G. S. Shieh, Z. Bai, and W.-Y. Tsai. Rank Tests for Independence--With a Weighted Contamination Alternative. Stat. Sinica, 10, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Selenium. 2013. http://selenium.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. B. Tan, X. Shen, and C. Zhai. Mining long-term search history to improve search accuracy. KDD, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Top 500 e-retailers. http://www.top500guide.com/top-500/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Top booking sites. http://skift.com/2013/11/11/top-25-online-booking-sites-in-travel/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. T. Vissers, N. Nikiforakis, N. Bielova, and W. Joosen. Crying Wolf? On the Price Discrimination of Online Airline Tickets. HotPETs, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. J. Valentino-Devries, J. Singer-Vine, and A. Soltani. Websites Vary Prices, Deals Based on Users' Information. Wall Street Journal, 2012. http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887323777204578189391813881534.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. I. Weber and A. Jaimes. Who Uses Web Search for What? And How? WSDM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. T. Wadhwa. How Advertisers Can Use Your Personal Information to Make You Pay Higher Prices. Huffington Post, 2014. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tarun-wadhwa/how-advertisers-can-use-y_b_4703013.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. C. E. Wills and C. Tatar. Understanding What They Do with What They Know. WPES, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. X. Xing, W. Meng, D. Doozan, N. Feamster, W. Lee, and A. C. Snoeren. Exposing Inconsistent Web Search Results with Bobble. PAM, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. X. Xing, W. Meng, D. Doozan, A. C. Snoeren, N. Feamster, and W. Lee. Take This Personally: Pollution Attacks on Personalized Services. USENIX Security, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Y. Xu, B. Zhang, Z. Chen, and K. Wang. Privacy-Enhancing Personalized Web Search. WWW, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. B. Yu and G. Cai. A query-aware document ranking method for geographic information retrieval. GIR, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. X. Yi, H. Raghavan, and C. Leggetter. Discovering Users' Specific Geo Intention in Web Search. WWW, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Measuring Price Discrimination and Steering on E-commerce Web Sites

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            IMC '14: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference
            November 2014
            524 pages
            ISBN:9781450332132
            DOI:10.1145/2663716

            Copyright © 2014 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 5 November 2014

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            IMC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate32of103submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate277of1,083submissions,26%

            Upcoming Conference

            IMC '24
            ACM Internet Measurement Conference
            November 4 - 6, 2024
            Madrid , AA , Spain

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader