skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702326acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Trial of Bendi in a Coffeehouse: Use of a Shape-Changing Device for a Tactile-Visual Phone Conversation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present Bendi, a shape-changing device for a tactile-visual phone conversation. Bendi enables users to deliver shape-changing movements (e.g., upward or downward bending, left or right tilting, and shrinking) from the user's joystick input to the other party's device in real time during phone conversations. We conducted a user study to observe how seven couples used it over three days in a coffeehouse. Our field trial of Bendi in a coffeehouse showed the private and natural uses, and integrated uses of tactile and visual expressions along with the uses of the vocabularies developed through Bendi. In addition, there were active uses even in negative and serious conversational context with its pleasant tactile feelings and movement representations. Lastly, we discuss issues for the future designs and real-world deployment of shape-changing mobile devices for daily use.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn1054-file3.mp4

mp4

29.1 MB

p2181-park.mp4

mp4

172.5 MB

References

  1. Blythe, M., Monk, A. and Park, J. Technology biographies: field study techniques for home use product development. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2002, ACM, 658--659. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brave, S., Ishii, H. and Dahley, A. Tangible interfaces for remote collaboration and communication. In Proc. CSCW 1998, ACM, 169--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brown, B., Reeves, S. and Sherwood, S. Into the wild: challenges and opportunities for field trial methods. In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM, 1657--1666. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Brown, L., Sellen, A., Krishna, R. and Harper, R. Exploring the potential of audio-tactile messaging for remote interpersonal communication. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM, 1527--1530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chang, A., O'Modhrain, S., Jacob, R., Gunther, E., and Ishii, H. Comtouch: Design of a vibrotactile communication device. In Proc. DIS 2002, ACM, 312--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chung, H., Lee, C., Selker, T., Lover's Cups: drinking interfaces as new communication channels. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2006, ACM, 375--380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Fogg, B., Cutler, L. D., Arnold, P. and Eisbach, C. HandJive: a device for interpersonal haptic entertainment. In Proc. CHI 1998, ACM, 57--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. FurUnited Kingdomawa, M., Kajimoto, H. and Tachi, S. KUSUGURI: a shared tactile interface for bidirectional tickling, In Proc. Augmented Human, 2012, ACM, Article No. 9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gomes, A., Nesbitt, A. and Vertegaal, R. MorePhone: a study of actuated shape deformations for flexible thin-film smartphone notifications. In Proc. CHI 2013, ACM, 583--592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Haans, A. and IJsselsteijn, W. Mediated social touch: a review of current research and future directions. Virtual Reality 9 (2006), 149--159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hassenzahl, M., Heidecker, S., Eckoldt, K., Diefenbach, S. and Hillmann, U. All you need is love: Current strategies of mediating intimate relationships through technology. ACM TOCHI (2012). 19(4), No. 30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hemmert, F., Gollner, U., Löwe, M., Wohlauf, A. and Joost, G. Intimate mobiles: grasping, kissing and whispering as a means of telecommunication in mobile phones. In Proc. MobileHCI 2011, ACM, 21--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hemmert, F., Hamann, S., Löwe, M., Zeipelt, J. and Joost, G. Shape-changing mobiles: tapering in two-dimensional deformational displays in mobile phones, Ext. Abstracts CHI 2010, ACM, 3075--3080. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hemmert, F., Löwe, M., Wohlauf, A. and Joost, G. Animate Mobiles: Proxemically Reactive Posture Actuation as a Means of Relational Interaction with Mobile Phones. In Proc. TEI 2013, ACM, 267--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Heslin, R., Nguyen, T. D. and Nguyen, M. L. Meaning of touch: The case of touch from a stranger or same sex person. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 7(3) (1983), 147--157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Hoggan, E., Stewart, C., Haverinen, L., Jacucci, G. and Lantz, V. Pressages: Augmenting Phone Calls with NonVerbal Messages. In Proc. UIST 2012, ACM, 555--562. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jones, S. E. and Yarbrough, A. E. A naturalistic study of the meanings of touch. Communication monographs 52 (1985).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Knapp, M. L. Hall, J. A. Nonverbal communication in human interaction. Holly J. Allen Publisher, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin, H.-T., Leisk, G. G. and Trimmer, B. GoQBot: a caterpillar-inspired soft-bodied rolling robot. Bioinspiration & biomimetics Journal 6 (2011), No. 15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Mueller, F. F., Vetere, F., Gibbs, M. R., Kjeldskov, J., Pedell, S. and Howard, S. Hug over a distance, Ext. Abstracts CHI 2005, ACM, 1673--1676. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Nakanishi, H., Tanaka, K. and Wada, Y. Remote handshaking: touch enhances video-mediated social telepresence. In Proc. CHI 2014, ACM, 2143--2152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Park, J., Park, Y.-W. and Nam, T.-J. Wrigglo: shapechanging peripheral for interpersonal mobile communication. In Proc. CHI 2014, ACM, 3973--3976. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Park, Y-W., Bae, S-H. and Nam, T-J. How do couples use CheekTouch over phone calls?, In Proc. CHI 2012, ACM, 763--766. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Park, Y-W., Baek, K-M. and Nam, T-J. The Roles of Touch during Phone Conversations: Long-Distance Couples' Use of POKE in Their Homes, In Proc. CHI 2013, ACM, 1679--1688. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Pedersen, E. W., Subramanian, S. and Hornbæk, K. Is my phone alive?: a large-scale study of shape change in handheld devices using videos. In Proc. CHI 2014, ACM, 2579--2588. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Pelosi, M., Franek, O., Knudsen, M. B., Christensen, M. and Pedersen, G. F. A grip study for talk and data modes in mobile phones. Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Transactions on 57(4) (2009), 856--865.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Petersen, M.G. and Baillie, L. Methodologies for designing future household technologies. In Proc. Oikos 2001, Aarhus University Press, Denmark.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Rasmussen, M. K., Pedersen, E. W., Petersen, M. G. and Hornbæk, K. Shape-changing interfaces: a review of the design space and open research questions. In Proc. CHI 2012, ACM, 735--744. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Roudaut, A., Karnik, A., Löchtefeld, M. and Subramanian, S. Morphees: Toward High "Shape Resolution" in SelfActuated Flexible Mobile Devices. In Proc. CHI 2013, ACM, 593--602. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Roudaut, A., Rau, A., Sterz, C., Plauth, M., Lopes, P. and Baudisch, P. Gesture Output: Eyes-Free Output Using a Force Feedback Touch Surface. In Proc. CHI 2013, ACM, 2547--2556. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Samani, H. A., Parsani, R., Rodriguez, L. T., Saadatian, E., Dissanayake, K. H. and Cheok, A. D. Kissenger: design of a kiss transmission device. In Proc. DIS 2012, ACM, 48--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Togler, J., Hemmert, F. and Wettach, R. Living interfaces: the thrifty faucet. In Proc. TEI 2009, ACM, 43--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Walters, P. & McGoran, D. Digital fabrication of smart structures and mechanism: Creative applications in art and design. In Proc. IS&T 2011, 185--188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang, R., Quek, F., Tatar, D., Teh, K. S. and Cheok, A. Keep in touch: channel, expectation and experience. In Proc. CHI 2012, ACM, 139--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Yao, L., Niiyama, R., Ou, J., Follmer, S., Della Silva, C. and Ishii, H. PneUI: pneumatically actuated soft composite materials for shape changing interfaces. In Proc. UIST 2013, ACM, 13--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Yim, J.-D. and Shaw, C. D. Design considerations of expressive bidirectional telepresence robots. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2011, ACM, 781--790. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Trial of Bendi in a Coffeehouse: Use of a Shape-Changing Device for a Tactile-Visual Phone Conversation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2015
      4290 pages
      ISBN:9781450331456
      DOI:10.1145/2702123

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 April 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader