skip to main content
10.1145/2723576.2723604acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslakConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

How do you connect?: analysis of social capital accumulation in connectivist MOOCs

Published:16 March 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Connections established between learners via interactions are seen as fundamental for connectivist pedagogy. Connections can also be viewed as learning outcomes, i.e. learners' social capital accumulated through distributed learning environments. We applied linear mixed effects modeling to investigate whether the social capital accumulation interpreted through learners' centrality to course interaction networks, is influenced by the language learners use to express and communicate in two connectivist MOOCs. Interactions were distributed across the three social media, namely Twitter, blog and Facebook. Results showed that learners in a cMOOC connect easier with the individuals who use a more informal, narrative style, but still maintain a deeper cohesive structure to their communication.

References

  1. A. A. Mcauley, B. Stewart, G. Siemens, and D. Cormier, "The MOOC Model for Digital Practice," p. 33, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Fini, "The Technological Dimension of a Massive Open Online Course: The Case of the CCK08 Course Tools," Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn., vol. 10, no. 5, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. R. Kop, "The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a Massive Open Online Course," Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 19--38, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. R. Kop, J. Sui, and F. Mak, "A Pedagogy of Abundance or a Pedagogy to Support Human Beings? Participant Support on Massive Open Online Courses," Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn., vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 1--10, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. C. Milligan, A. Littlejohn, and A. Margaryan, "Patterns of Engagement in a Connectivist MOOC," J. Online Learn. Teach., vol. 9, no. 2, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Anh, B. Butler, and A. Alam, "Learner Participation and Engagement in Open Online Courses: Insights from the Peer 2 Peer University," MERLOT JOLT, vol. 9, no. 2, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. Knox, "Digital culture clash: 'massive' education in the Elearning and Digital Cultures MOOC," Distance Educ., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 164--177, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. N. Lin, "Social capital: a theory of social structure and action," Soc. Forces, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 1209--11, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Lockwood, "Community collaboration and social capital: an interview with Gary G. Wehlage," Lead. Tomorrows Sch., vol. 2, pp. 19--25, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Scott and P. Carrington, The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. SAGE, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. R. S. Burt, "The Network Structure of Social Capital," Res. Organ. Behav., vol. 22, pp. 345--423, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. O. Skrypnyk, S. Joksimovic, V. Kovanovic, D. Gasevic, and S. Dawson, "Roles of course facilitators, learners, and technology in the flow of information of a cMOOC," Br. J. Educ. Technol. Spec. Issue MOOCs, p. submmited for review, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Graesser, D. Mcnamara, and J. Kulikowich, "Coh-Metrix: Providing Multilevel Analyses of Text Characteristics," Educ. Res., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 223--234, Jun. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. C. Carceller, S. Dawson, and L. Lockyer, "Improving academic outcomes: does participating in online discussion forums payoff?," Int. J. Technol. Enhanc. Learn., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 117--132, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. L. M. Vaquero and M. Cebrian, "The rich club phenomenon in the classroom," Sci Rep, vol. 3, Jan. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D. Gašević, A. Zouaq, and R. Janzen, "'Choose Your Classmates, Your GPA Is at Stake!': The Association of Cross-Class Social Ties and Academic Performance," Am. Behav. Sci., 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. V. Kovanović, S. Joksimović, D. Gašević, and M. Hatala, "What is the Source of Social Capital? The Association between Social Network Position and Social Presence in Communities of Inquiry," in Proceedings of the Workshops held at Educational Data Mining 2014, co-located with 7th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2014), London, UK, 2014, pp. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. A. J. Scholand, Y. R. Tausczik, and J. W. Pennebaker, "Assessing Group Interaction with Social Language Network Analysis," in Advances in Social Computing, S.-K. Chai, J. J. Salerno, and P. L. Mabry, Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010, pp. 248--255. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. C. Graesser and D. S. McNamara, "Computational Analyses of Multilevel Discourse Comprehension," Top. Cogn. Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 371--398, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. W. Kintsch, Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. C. E. Snow, Reading for Understanding: Toward a Research and Development Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. N. Dowell, W. Cade, Y. Tausczik, J. Pennebaker, and A. Graesser, "What Works: Creating Adaptive and Intelligent Systems for Collaborative Learning Support," Intell. Tutoring Syst. Proc. ITS 2014, pp. 124--133, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. L. C. Freeman, "Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification," Soc. Netw., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 215--239, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. S. Wasserman and K. Faust, Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994, p. 825.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. G. Csardi and T. Nepusz, "The igraph software package for complex network research," InterJournalournal, vol. Complex Sy, p. 1695, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. D. S. McNamara, A. C. Graesser, P. M. McCarthy, and Z. Cai, Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge, M.A.: Cambridge University Press., 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. J. C. Pinheiro and D. M. Bates, Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. S. W. Raudenbush and A. S. Bryk, Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. SAGE Publications, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning, 2nd editio. New York: Springer, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. R. Xu, "Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models," Stat. Med., vol. 22, no. 22, pp. 3527--3541, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. D. Bates, M. Maechler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker, lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. R. H. Baayen, Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. M. De Laat, "Networked learning," Police Acad. Neth. Apeldoorn, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. S. Dawson and G. Siemens, "Analytics to literacies: The development of a learning analytics framework for multiliteracies assessment," Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn., vol. 15, no. 4, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. R. M. Bernard, P. C. Abrami, E. Borokhovski, C. A. Wade, R. M. Tamim, M. A. Surkes, and E. C. Bethel, "A Meta-Analysis of Three Types of Interaction Treatments in Distance Education," Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 1243--1289, Sep. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. E. Borokhovski, R. Tamim, R. M. Bernard, P. C. Abrami, and A. Sokolovskaya, "Are contextual and designed student--student interaction treatments equally effective in distance education?," Distance Educ., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 311--329, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. How do you connect?: analysis of social capital accumulation in connectivist MOOCs

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        LAK '15: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge
        March 2015
        448 pages
        ISBN:9781450334174
        DOI:10.1145/2723576

        Copyright © 2015 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 16 March 2015

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        LAK '15 Paper Acceptance Rate20of74submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate236of782submissions,30%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader