Rahul C. Basole
Jukka Huhtamäki
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Business ecosystems consist of a heterogeneous and continuously evolving set of entities that are interconnected through a complex, global network of relationships. However, there is no well-established methodology to study the dynamics of this network. Traditional approaches have primarily utilized a single source of data of relatively established firms; however, these approaches ignore the vast number of relevant activities that often occur at the individual and entrepreneurial levels. We argue that a data-driven visualization approach, using both institutionally and socially curated datasets, can provide important complementary, triangulated explanatory insights into the dynamics of interorganizational networks in general and business ecosystems in particular. We develop novel visualization layouts to help decision makers systemically identify and compare ecosystems. Using traditionally disconnected data sources on deals and alliance relationships (DARs), executive and funding relationships (EFRs), and public opinion and discourse (POD), we empirically illustrate our data-driven method of data triangulation and visualization techniques through three cases in the mobile industry Google’s acquisition of Motorola Mobility, the coopetitive relation between Apple and Samsung, and the strategic partnership between Nokia and Microsoft. The article concludes with implications and future research opportunities.
- R. Adner. 2012. The Wide Lens: A New Strategy for Innovation. Penguin Group, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- G. Ahuja. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly 45, 3 (2000), 425--455.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Ahuja, G. Soda, and A. Zaheer. 2011. The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organization Science 23, 2 (2011), 443--448. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Alsallakh, L. Micallef, W. Aigner, H. Hauser, S. Miksch, and P. Rodgers. 2014. Visualizing sets and set-typed data: State-of-the-art and future challenges. EuroVis - STARs, R. Borgo, R. Maciejewski, and I. Viola (Eds.). The Eurographics Association. DOI: 10.2312/eurovisstar.20141170Google Scholar
- B. N. Anand and T. Khanna. 2000. Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management Journal 21, 3 (2000), 295--315.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A.-L. Barabási. 2003. Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means. Plume, New York, NY. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. J. Barnes and R. T. Vidgen. 2006. Data triangulation and web quality metrics: A case study in e-government. Information & Management 43, 6 (2006), 767--777. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. C. Basole. 2009. Visualization of interfirm relations in a converging mobile ecosystem. Journal of Information Technology 24, 2 (2009), 144--159.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. C. Basole. 2014. Visual business ecosystem intelligence: Lessons from the field. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 34, 5 (2014), 51--58.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. C. Basole, T. Clear, M. Hu, H. Mehrotra, and J. Stasko. 2013. Understanding interfirm relationships in business ecosystems with interactive visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (2013), 2526--2535. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. C. Basole, M. Hu, P. Patel, and J. T. Stasko. 2012. Visual analytics for converging-business-ecosystem intelligence. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 32, 1 (2012), 92--96. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. C. Basole and W. B. Rouse. 2008. Complexity of service value networks: Conceptualization and empirical investigation. IBM Systems Journal 47, 1 (2008), 53--70. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. C. Basole, C. D. Seuss, and W. B. Rouse. 2013. IT innovation adoption by enterprises: Knowledge discovery through text analytics. Decision Support Systems 54, 2 (2013), 1044--1054. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Bastian, S. Heymann, and M. Jacomy. 2009. Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google Scholar
- L. Bizzi and A. Langley. 2012. Studying processes in and around networks. Industrial Marketing Management 41, 2 (2012), 224--234.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. W. H. Blaikie. 1991. A critique of the use of triangulation in social research. Quality & Quantity 25, 2 (1991), 115--136.Google Scholar
- S. P. Borgatti, A. Mehra, D. J. Brass, and G. Labianca. 2009. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323, 5916 (2009), 892--895.Google Scholar
- C. L. Borgman. 2007. Scholarship in the Digital Age. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Bratthall and M. Jørgensen. 2002. Can you trust a single data source exploratory software engineering case study? Empirical Software Engineering 7, 1 (2002), 9--26. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Buchanan. 2002. Small World: Uncovering Nature’s Hidden Networks. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London, UK.Google Scholar
- R. S. Burt. 2009. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- S. K. Card, J. D. Mackinlay, and B. Shneiderman. 1999. Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Carson, A. Gilmore, C. Perry, and K. Gronhaug. 2001. Qualitative Marketing Research. Sage.Google Scholar
- N. K. Denzin. 2009. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
- C. Dhanaraj and A. Parkhe. 2006. Orchestrating innovation networks. Academy of Management Review 31, 3 (2006), 659--669.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Dougherty and D. D. Dunne. 2011. Organizing ecologies of complex innovation. Organization Science 22, 5 (2011), 1214--1223. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. M. Eisenhardt and C. B. Schoonhoven. 1996. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science 7, 2 (1996), 136--150. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Fox and J. Hendler. 2011. Changing the equation on scientific data visualization. Science 331, 6018 (2011), 705--708.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. J. Gallivan. 1997. Value in triangulation: A comparison of two approaches for combining qualitative and quantitative methods. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC8 WG 8.2 International Conference on Information Systems and Qualitative Research. 417--443. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Gibbert, W. Ruigrok, and B. Wicki. 2008. What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal 29, 13 (2008), 1465--1474.Google Scholar
- J. Giles. 2005. Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature 438, 1 (2005), 900--901.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Gladwell. 2000. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Little, Brown.Google Scholar
- D. G. Green and S. Sadedin. 2005. Interactions matter complexity in landscapes and ecosystems. Ecological Complexity 2, 2 (2005), 117--130.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Gulati. 1998. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal 19, 4 (1998), 293--317.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Gulati, N. Nohria, and A. Zaheer. 2000. Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal 21, 3 (2000), 203--215.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Hagel and J. S. Brown. 2005. The Only Sustainable Edge: Why Business Strategy Depends on Productive Friction and Dynamic Specialization. Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
- M. Hammersley and P. Atkinson. 1983. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. Routledge, London, UK.Google Scholar
- D. Hsu. 2006. Venture capitalists and cooperative start-up commercialization strategy. Management Science 52, 2 (2006), 204--219. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Huisman and M. A. J. van Duijn. 2005. Software for statistical analysis of social networks. IEEE Intelligent Systems 20, 1 (2005), 80--82.Google Scholar
- V. W. Hwang and G. Horowitt. 2012. The Rainforest: The Secret to Building the Next Silicon Valley. Regenwald.Google Scholar
- M. Iansiti and R. Levien. 2004. The Keystone Advantage: What New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- M. Iansiti and G. L. Richards. 2006. The information technology ecosystem: Structure, health and performance. Antitrust Bulletin 51, 1 (2006), 77--110.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Ibarra and M. T. Hansen. 2011. Are you a collaborative leader? Harvard Business Review 89, 7/8 (2011), 68--74.Google Scholar
- B. Iyer, C. H. Lee, and N. Venkatraman. 2006. Managing in a small world ecosystem: Some lessons from the software sector. California Management Review 48, 3 (2006), 28--47.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. D. Jick. 1979. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly 24, 4 (1979), 602--611.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Kaplan and D. Duchon. 1988. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research: A case study. MIS Quarterly 12, 4 (1988), 571--586. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Klein, B. Moon, and R. R. Hoffman. 2006. Making sense of sensemaking 2: A macrocognitive model. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21, 5 (2006), 88--92. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Langley. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review 24, 4 (1999), 691--710.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. B. Laughlin and D. Pines. 2000. The theory of everything. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97, 1 (2000), 28.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Leskovec, D. Huttenlocker, and J. Kleinberg. 2010. Governance in social media: A case study of the Wikipedia promotion process. In Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google Scholar
- P. Lord and A. Macdonald. 2003. e-Science Curation Report: Data Curation for e-Science in the UK: An Audit to Establish Requirements for Future Curation and Provision. Digital Archiving Consultancy Limited.Google Scholar
- K.-L. Ma, I. Liao, J. Frazier, H. Hauser, and H.-N. Kostis. 2012. Scientific storytelling using visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 32, 1 (2012), 12--19. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. L. Markus. 1994. Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organization Science 5, 4 (1994), 502--527. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. McAfee and E. Brynjolfsson. 2012. Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Business Review 90, 10 (2012), 60--128.Google Scholar
- J. F. Moore. 1993. Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review 71, 3 (1993), 75--86.Google Scholar
- I. Newman and C. S. Ridenour. 1998. Qualitative-Quantitative Research Methodology: Exploring the Interactive Continuum. Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
- C. North. 2006. Toward measuring visualization insight. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26, 3 (2006), 6--9. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Oliver. 1990. Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review 15, 2 (1990), 241--265.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. J. Onwuegbuzie and N. L. Leech. 2007. Validity and qualitative research: An oxymoron? Quality & Quantity 41, 2 (2007), 233--249.Google Scholar
- J. Owen-Smith and W. W. Powell. 2004. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the boston biotechnology community. Organization Science 15, 1 (2004), 5--21. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. F. Padgett and W. W. Powell. 2012. The Emergence of Organizations and Markets. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
- M. Q. Patton. 2001. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- W. W. Powell and E. Giannella. 2009. Collective Invention and Inventor Networks. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
- I. Prigogine. 1997. The End of Certainty. Free Press.Google Scholar
- N. Rubens, K. Still, J. Huhtamäki, and M. G. Russell. 2010. Leveraging social media for analysis of innovation players and their moves. Technical report, Media X, Stanford University.Google Scholar
- N. Rubens, K. Still, J. Huhtamäki, and M. G. Russell. 2011. A network analysis of investment firms as resource routers in the chinese innovation ecosystem. Journal of Software 6, 9 (2011), 1737--1745.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. G. Russell, K. Still, J. Huhtamäki, C. Yu, and N. Rubens. 2011. Transforming innovation ecosystems through shared vision and network orchestration. In Proceedings of the Triple Helix IX International Conference.Google Scholar
- R. C. Sampson. 2004. Organizational choice in R&D alliances: Knowledge-based and transaction cost perspectives. Managerial and Decision Economics 25, 6--7 (2004), 421--436.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. A. Schilling. 2009. Understanding the alliance data. Strategic Management Journal 30, 3 (2009), 233--260.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. A. Schilling and C. C. Phelps. 2007. Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science 53, 7 (2007), 1113--1126. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Segel and J. Heer. 2010. Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 16, 6 (2010), 1139--1148. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. D. Seuss. 2009. Meaning extraction helps develop in-depth understanding. Competitive Intelligence Magazine 12, 5/6 (2009), 51--54.Google Scholar
- C. D. Seuss. 2011. In-depth understanding: Teaching search engines to interpret meaning {Point of View}. Proceedings of the IEEE 99, 4 (2011), 531--535.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Smagorinsky. 1995. The social construction of data: Methodological problems of investigating learning in the zone of proximal development. Review of Educational Research 65, 3 (1995), 191--212.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. W. Smith. 1975. Strategies of Social Research: The Methodological Imagination. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
- K. Still, J. Huhtamäki, M. G. Russell, and N. Rubens. 2012. Paradigm shift in innovation indicators: From analog to digital. In Proceedings of the 5th ISPIM Innovation Symposium.Google Scholar
- J. J. Thomas and K. A. Cook. 2006. A visual analytics agenda. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26, 1 (2006), 10--13. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Tufte. 1983. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Urry. 2004. Small worlds and the new social physics. Global Networks 4, 2 (2004), 109--130.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. L. Vargo and R. F. Lusch. 2004. Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing 68, 1 (2004), 1--17.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Venkatraman and V. Ramanujam. 1987. Measurement of business economic performance: An examination of method convergence. Journal of Management 13, 1 (1987), 109--122.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. C. Wong and J. Thomas. 2004. Visual analytics. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 24, 5 (2004), 20--21. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Xu, X. Chen, and D. Liu. 2009. Classifying software visualization tools using the Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive domain. In Proceedings of the Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2009 (CCECE’09). IEEE, 13--18.Google Scholar
- R. K. Yin. 2008. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Vol. 5. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- A. Zaheer, R. Gzbyk, and H. Milanov. 2010. Its the connections: The network perspective in interorganizational research. Academy of Management Perspectives 24, 1 (2010), 62--77.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Understanding Business Ecosystem Dynamics: A Data-Driven Approach
Recommendations
Constructing business ecosystem from firm perspective: cases in high-tech industry
MEDES '09: Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystemsThe concepts of Business ecosystem become acceptable both in academic researcher and practitioners during last decade. The competition among companies also evolved from the level of operation management, supply chain management toward to business ...
Business Ecosystem Governance and Openness in the New Digital Age: An Exploratory Model
ICSET 2017: Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on E-Society, E-Education and E-TechnologyThe article places focus on open governance of business ecosystem in the context of internet economy. We describe open governance of business ecosystem as a collective and strategic process by which critical participants strategically interact with ...
Sustaining Superior Performance in Business Ecosystems: Evidence from Application Software Developers in the iOS and Android Smartphone Ecosystems
We study the phenomenon of business ecosystems in which platform firms orchestrate the functioning of ecosystems by providing platforms and setting the rules for participation by complementor firms. We develop a theoretical framework to explain how the ...
Comments