skip to main content
10.1145/2742032.2742033acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiuxidConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Development of gamification-enriched pedagogical agent for e-Learning system based on community of inquiry

Published:08 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

Researchers have recognized that the success impact of e-Learning is not only affected by technical aspect but also pedagogical one. Facilitators in online learning class should be able to motivate their students to be active learners. One of the ways to do so is by giving personalized feedback. However, this is quite difficult to be applied. Therefore, the idea of developing a pedagogical agent arose to help the facilitators in providing automatic feedback to the students based on their behavior in e-Learning system. The pedagogical agent in the current study was built based on Community of Inquiry (CoI) model and enriched with gamification concept to be more attractive. The proposed design of pedagogical agent was evaluated by one-week online learning simulation, feedback form filling, and focus group discussion. The pedagogical agent is hoped to be able to boost students' motivation to use e-Learning system optimally, so that the learning objectives could be accomplished.

References

  1. Ehlers, U. D., Web 2.0 - E-Learning 2.0 - Quality 2.0? Quality for New Learning Cultures, Proquest - Quality Assurance in Education (2009), 296--314.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, T., The Theory and Practice of Online Learning, Edmonton: Athabasca University Press (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Coll, C., Rochera, M. J., and Gispert, I. D., Supporting online collaboration learning in small groups: teacher feedback on learning content, academic task, and social participation, Science Direct: Computer and Education (2014), 53--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gulz, A., and Haake, M., Design of animated pedagogical agents - A look at their look, Science Direct: Human-Computer Studies (2006), 322--339. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Schroeder, N. L., Exploring Pedagogical Agent Use within Learner-attenuated System-paced Learning Environments, Washington: Proquest (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarebout, G. and Heidig, S., Pedagogical Agent, Springer (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Yan, J., and Agada, R., Methods of Improving Communications by a Life-Like Animated Pedagogical Agent, IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Wang, N., Johnson, W. L., Mayer, R. E., Rizzo, P., Shaw, E., and Collins, H., The politeness effect: pedagogical agent and learning outcomes, Science Direct: Human-Computer Studies (2008), 98--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Amriani, A., Aji, A. F., Utomo, A. Y., and Kasiyah, An Empirical Study of Gamification Impact in E-Learning Environment, IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology, China (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O'Hara, K., and Dixon, D., Gamification: Using Game Design Elements in Non-Gaming Contexts, ACM CHI (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Google Trends - Web search interest: Gamification, Worldwide 2010--2014, {Online}. {Accessed 8 May 2014}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Deterding, S., Gamification: Designing for Motivation, ACM Interactions (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mahadar, R., Optimizing Gamification Design, Cognizant (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Amriani, A., Aji, A. F., Utomo, A. Y., Wahidah F., and Kasiyah, Gamified E-Learning Model based on Community of Inquiry (2014), 2014 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems, Jakarta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. O'Donovan, S., Gamification of the Games Course, University of Cape Town Research Document Archive (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J., and Goncalves, D., Engaging Engineering Student with Gamification, IEEE (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Garrison, R., Anderson, T., and Archer, W., Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education, Elsevier Science - The Internet and Higher Education (2000), 87--105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., and Archer, W., Critical Thinking, Cognitive Presence, and Computer Conferencing in Distance Education (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., and Archer, W., Assessing Social Presence in Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing, Journal of Distance Education (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., and Archer, W., Assessing Teaching Presence in a Computer Conferencing Context, JALN (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. CoI Model -- Community of Inquiry, {Online}. Available: https://coi.athabascau.ca/coi-model/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ueno, M., Animated Pedagogical Agent based on Decision Tree for E-Learning, IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hasibuan, Z. A., and Santoso, H. B., The Use of E-Learning Towards New Learning Paradigm: Case Study Sudent Centered E-Learning Environment at Faculty of Computer Science - University of Indonesia, Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (2005). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Veletsianos, G., How do learners respond to pedagogical agents that deliver social-oriented non-task messages? Impact on student learning, perceptions, and experiences, Science Direct: Computers in Human Behavior (2011), 275--283. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Lester, J. C., Converse, S. A., Kahler, S. E., Barlow, S. T., Stone, B. A., and Bhogal, R. S., The Persona Effect: Affective Impact of Animated Pedagogical Agents, ACM SIGCHI: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (1997), 359--366. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Miami University of Ohio, Usability Testing: Developing Useful dan Usable Products, Ohio: Miami University of Ohio (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Student-Centered Learning: Relinquishing Control - Boston University, 2013. {Online}. Available: http://www.bu.edu/ceit/files/2009/05/Student-Centered-Learning1.pptm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Getting Into It: Becoming an Active, Creative Learner, {Online}. Available: https://www.mcgraw-hill.co.uk/openup/chapters/9780335234424.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. About Moodle - Moodle Docs, 2014. {Online}. Available: http://docs.moodle.org/27/en/About_Moodle. {Accessed 13 May 2014}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Development of gamification-enriched pedagogical agent for e-Learning system based on community of inquiry

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Other conferences
                CHIuXiD '15: Proceedings of the International HCI and UX Conference in Indonesia
                April 2015
                87 pages
                ISBN:9781450333344
                DOI:10.1145/2742032

                Copyright © 2015 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 8 April 2015

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate22of50submissions,44%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader