skip to main content
10.1145/2783258.2788616acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Gender and Interest Targeting for Sponsored Post Advertising at Tumblr

Published:10 August 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

As one of the leading platforms for creative content, Tumblr offers advertisers a unique way of creating brand identity. Advertisers can tell their story through images, animation, text, music, video, and more, and can promote that content by sponsoring it to appear as an advertisement in the users' live feeds. In this paper, we present a framework that enabled two of the key targeted advertising components for Tumblr, gender and interest targeting. We describe the main challenges encountered during the development of the framework, which include the creation of a ground truth for training gender prediction models, as well as mapping Tumblr content to a predefined interest taxonomy. For purposes of inferring user interests, we propose a novel semi-supervised neural language model for categorization of Tumblr content (i.e., post tags and post keywords). The model was trained on a large-scale data set consisting of $6.8$ billion user posts, with a very limited amount of categorized keywords, and was shown to have superior performance over the baseline approaches. We successfully deployed gender and interest targeting capability in Yahoo production systems, delivering inference for users that covers more than 90% of daily activities on Tumblr. Online performance results indicate advantages of the proposed approach, where we observed 20% increase in user engagement with sponsored posts in comparison to untargeted campaigns.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p1819.mp4

mp4

185.8 MB

References

  1. A. Ahmed, Y. Low, M. Aly, V. Josifovski, and A. J. Smola. Scalable distributed inference of dynamic user interests for behavioral targeting. In KDD, pages 114--122, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Alba, J. Lynch, B. Weitz, C. Janiszewski, R. Lutz, A. Sawyer, and S. Wood. Interactive home shopping: consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. The Journal of Marketing, pages 38--53, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. N. Barbieri, F. Bonchi, and G. Manco. Who to follow and why: link prediction with explanations. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 1266--1275. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. F. Bonchi, R. Perego, F. Silvestri, H. Vahabi, and R. Venturini. Efficient query recommendations in the long tail via center-piece subgraphs. In Proceedings of the 35th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '12, pages 345--354, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Z. Broder. Computational advertising and recommender systems. In Proceedings of the ACM conference on Recommender systems, pages 1--2. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Y. Chang, L. Tang, Y. Inagaki, and Y. Liu. What is tumblr: A statistical overview and comparison. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 16(1):21--29, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. K. Chellappa and R. G. Sin. Personalization versus privacy: An empirical examination of the online consumer's dilemma. Information Technology and Management, 6(2--3):181--202, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. S. Das, M. Datar, A. Garg, and S. Rajaram. Google news personalization: Scalable online collaborative filtering. In WWW, pages 271--280. ACM, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Essex. Matchmaker, matchmaker. Communications of the ACM, 52(5):16--17, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Langford, L. Li, and T. Zhang. Sparse online learning via truncated gradient. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 10:777--801, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Majumder and N. Shrivastava. Know your personalization: Learning topic level personalization in online services. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pages 873--884, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. U. Manber, A. Patel, and J. Robison. Experience with personalization on Yahoo! Communications of the ACM, 43(8):35, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. T. Mikolov, I. Sutskever, K. Chen, G. S. Corrado, and J. Dean. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In NIPS, pages 3111--3119, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. D. Riecken. Personalized views of personalization. Communications of the ACM, 43(8):27--28, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. Shin, S. Cetintas, and K.-C. Lee. Recommending tumblr blogs to follow with inductive matrix completion. In RecSys 14 Poster Proceedings, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. T. Singh, L. Veron-Jackson, and J. Cullinane. Blogging: A new play in your marketing game plan. Business Horizons, 51(4):281--292, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. S. K. Tyler, S. Pandey, E. Gabrilovich, and V. Josifovski. Retrieval models for audience selection in display advertising. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 593--598. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. C. Yi, T. Lei, I. Yoshiyuki, and L. Yan. What is tumblr: A statistical overview and comparison. arXiv:1403.5206v2, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Gender and Interest Targeting for Sponsored Post Advertising at Tumblr

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '15: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
      August 2015
      2378 pages
      ISBN:9781450336642
      DOI:10.1145/2783258

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 August 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      KDD '15 Paper Acceptance Rate160of819submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

      Upcoming Conference

      KDD '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader