skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858037acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Modeling the Steering Time Difference between Narrowing and Widening Tunnels

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The performance of trajectory-based tasks is modeled by the steering law, which predicts the required time from the index of difficulty (ID). This paper focuses on the fact that the time required to pass through a straight path with linearly-varying width alters depending on the direction of the movement. In this study, an expression for the relationship between the ID of narrowing and widening paths has been developed. This expression can be used to predict the movement time needed to pass through in the opposite direction from only a few data points, after measuring the time needed in the other direction. In the experiment, the times for five IDs were predicted with high precision from the measured time for one ID, thereby illustrating the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn0100-file3.mp4

mp4

17.1 MB

References

  1. Johnny Accot and Shumin Zhai. 1997. Beyond Fitts' law: models for trajectory-based HCI tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '97), 295--302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/258549.258760 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Johnny Accot and Shumin Zhai. 1999. Performance evaluation of input devices in trajectory-based tasks: an application of the steering law. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '99), pp.466--472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/302979.303133 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Johnny Accot and Shumin Zhai. 2001. Scale effects in steering law tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '01), pp.1--8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/365024.365027 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Johnny Accot and Shumin Zhai. 2002. More than dotting the i's -- foundations for crossing-based interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '02), 73--80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/503376.503390 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Johnny Accot and Shumin Zhai. 2003. Refining Fitts' law models for bivariate pointing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03), 193--200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/642611.642646 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Takeshi Asano, Ehud Sharlin, Yoshifumi Kitamura, Kazuki Takashima, and Fumio Kishino. 2005. Predictive interaction using the delphian desktop. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '05), 133--141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1095034.1095058 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Géry Casiez, Patricia Plénacoste, and Christophe Chaillou. 2004. Does DOF separation on elastic devices improve user 3D steering task performance? In Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Conference on Computer Human Interaction (APCHI '04), pp.70--80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978--3--540--27795--8_8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Jack Tigh Dennerlein, David B. Martin, and Christopher Hasser. 2000. Force-feedback improves performance for steering and combined steeringtargeting tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '00), 423--429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/332040.332469 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Paul M. Fitts. 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol.47, No.6, 381--391. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0055392Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Carl Gutwin and Amy Skopik. 2003. Fisheyes are good for large steering tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03), 201--208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/642611.642648 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Raghavendra S. Kattinakere, Tovi Grossman, and Sriram Subramanian. 2007. Modeling steering within above-the-surface interaction layers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07), 317--326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240678 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sergey Kulikov, I. Scott MacKenzie, and Wolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2005. Measuring the effective parameters of steering motions. In Extended Abstracts of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05), 1569--1572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1056968 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Sergey Kulikov and Wolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2006. Targeted steering motions. In Extended Abstracts of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), 983--988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125640 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lei Liu, Jean-Bernard Martens, and Robert van Liere. 2011. Revisiting path steering for 3D manipulation tasks. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol.69, Issue 3, 170--181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.11.006 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Martez E. Mott, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2014. Beating the bubble: using kinematic triggering in the bubble lens for acquiring small, dense targets. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 733--742. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557410 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Satoshi Naito, Yoshifumi Kitamura, and Fumio Kishino. 2004. Steering law in an environment of spatially coupled style with matters of pointer size and trajectory width. In Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Conference on Computer Human Interaction (APCHI '04), 305--316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978--3--540--27795--8_31Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Robert Pastel. 2006. Measuring the difficulty of steering through corners. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), 1087--1096. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124934 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Minghui Sun, Xiangshi Ren, Shumin Zhai, and Toshiharu Mukai. 2012. An investigation of the relationship between texture and human performance in steering tasks. In Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Conference on Computer Human Interaction (APCHI '12), 1--6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2350046.2350048 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Xiaolei Zhou, Xiang Cao, and Xiangshi Ren. 2009. Speed-accuracy tradeoff in trajectory-based tasks with temporal constraint. In Proceedings of the IFIP International Conference on Human Computer Interaction (INTERACT '09), 906--919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978--3--642-03655--2_99 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Shumin Zhai, Johnny Accot, and Rogier Woltjer. 2004. Human action laws in electronic virtual worlds: an empirical study of path steering performance in VR. Presence, Vol.13, No.2, 113--127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/1054746041382393 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Modeling the Steering Time Difference between Narrowing and Widening Tunnels

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader