skip to main content
10.1145/2858036.2858277acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Digitally Augmenting Sports: An Opportunity for Exploring and Understanding Novel Balancing Techniques

Published:07 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Using game balancing techniques can provide the right level of challenge and hence enhance player engagement for sport players with different skill levels. Digital technology can support and enhance balancing techniques in sports, for example, by adjusting players' level of intensity based on their heart rate. However, there is limited knowledge on how to design such balancing and its impact on the user experience. To address this we created two novel balancing techniques enabled by digitally augmenting a table tennis table. We adjusted the more skilled player's performance by inducing two different styles of play and studied the effects on game balancing and player engagement. We showed that by altering the more skilled player's performance we can balance the game through: (i) encouraging game mistakes, and (ii) changing the style of play to one that is easier for the opponent to counteract. We outline the advantages and disadvantages of each approach, extending our understanding of game balancing design. We also show that digitally augmenting sports offers opportunities for novel balancing techniques while facilitating engaging experiences, guiding those interested in HCI and sports.

References

  1. Ernest Adams. 2010. Fundamentals of game design. New Riders, Berkeley, Calif. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Charu C. Aggarwal. 2013. Outlier analysis. Springer, NY, NY. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Richard B. Alderman. 1974. Psychological behavior in sport. Saunders, Philadelphia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. David Altimira, Florian Mueller, Gun Lee, Jenny Clarke, and Mark Billinghurst. 2014. Towards Understanding Balancing in Exertion Games. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article 10, 8 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2663806.2663838 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. John W. Atkinson. 1957. Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review 64, 6, Pt.1 (1957), 359--372. http://ezproxy.canterbury.ac.nz/login?url=http: //search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=pdh&AN=1959-03029-001&site=ehost-liveGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. A Baca. 2008. Feedback systems. Computers in Sport (2008), 43--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Scott Bateman, Regan L. Mandryk, Tadeusz Stach, and Carl Gutwin. 2011. Target assistance for subtly balancing competitive play. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2355--2364. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979287 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Howard S. Becker. 1958. Problems of Inference and Proof in Participant Observation. American Sociological Review 23, 6 (1958), 652--660.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze. 2013. Understanding the Role of Body Movement in Player Engagement. Human Computer Interaction 28, 1 (2013), 40--75. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2012.688468Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jared E. Cechanowicz, Carl Gutwin, Scott Bateman, Regan Mandryk, and Ian Stavness. 2014. Improving Player Balancing in Racing Games. In Proceedings of the First ACM SIGCHI Annual Symposium on Computer-human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 47--56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2658537.2658701 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jenova Chen. 2007. Flow in Games (and Everything else). Commun. ACM 50, 4 (2007), 31--34. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1232743.1232769 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 1990. Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Stefan Engeser and Falko Rheinberg. 2008. Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motivation and Emotion 32, 3 (2008), 158--172. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008--9102--4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Kathrin Maria Gerling, Matthew Miller, Regan L. Mandryk, Max Valentin Birk, and Jan David Smeddinck. 2014. Effects of Balancing for Physical Abilities on Player Performance, Experience and Self-esteem in Exergames. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 2201--2210. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2556963 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hiroshi Ishii, Craig Wisneski, Julian Orbanes, Ben Chun, and Joe Paradiso. 1999. PingPongPlus: design of an athletic-tangible interface for computer-supported cooperative play. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '99). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 394--401. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/302979.303115 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2010. Research methods in human-computer interaction. Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex, U.K. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Florian Mueller, Martin R. Gibbs, and Frank Vetere. 2008. Taxonomy of exertion games. In Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Designing for Habitus and Habitat (OZCHI '08). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 263--266. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1517744.1517772 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Florian Mueller, Frank Vetere, Martin Gibbs, Darren Edge, Stefan Agamanolis, Jennifer Sheridan, and Jeffrey Heer. 2012. Balancing exertion experiences. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 1853--1862. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208322 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Curtiss Murphy, Dustin Chertoff, Michael Guerrero, and Kerry Moffitt. 2015. Design Better Games: Flow, Motivation, and Fun. In Design and Development of Training Games: Practical Guidelines from a Multidisciplinary Perspective, Talib Hussain and Susan Coleman (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, Chapter 6, 146--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Heather L. O'Brien and Elaine G. Toms. 2010. The development and evaluation of a survey to measure user engagement. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 61, 1 (2010), 50--69. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.v61:1 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Katie Salen and Eric Zimmerman. 2003. Rules of play: game design fundamentals. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Tadeusz Stach, T. C. Nicholas Graham, Jeffrey Yim, and Ryan E. Rhodes. 2009. Heart rate control of exercise video games. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2009 (GI '09). Canadian Information Processing Society, Toronto, Ont., Canada, 125--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Tim B Swartz. 2009. A new handicapping system for golf. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports 5, 2 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Peter Vorderer, Tilo Hartmann, and Christoph Klimmt. 2003. Explaining the enjoyment of playing video games: the role of competition. In Proceedings of the second international conference on Entertainment computing (ICEC '03). Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1--9. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=958720.958735 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Goran Vuckovic, Brane Deman, Stanislav Kovacic, and Janez Perž. 2009. Quantitative analysis of playing efficiency in squash. Science and racket sports IV (2009), 220--226.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Digitally Augmenting Sports: An Opportunity for Exploring and Understanding Novel Balancing Techniques

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2016
      6108 pages
      ISBN:9781450333627
      DOI:10.1145/2858036

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate565of2,435submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader