skip to main content
10.1145/2896982.2896992acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modeling for sustainability

Published:14 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Various disciplines use models for different purposes. While engineering models, including software engineering models, are often developed to guide the construction of a nonexistent system, scientific models, in contrast, are created to better understand a natural phenomenon (i.e., an already existing system). An engineering model may incorporate scientific models to build a system. Both engineering and scientific models have been used to support sustainability, but largely in a loosely-coupled fashion, independently developed and maintained from each other. Due to the inherent complex nature of sustainability that must balance trade-offs between social, environmental, and economic concerns, modeling challenges abound for both the scientific and engineering disciplines. This paper offers a vision that synergistically combines engineering and scientific models to enable broader engagement of society for addressing sustainability concerns, informed decision-making based on more-accessible scientific models and data, and automated feedback to the engineering models to support dynamic adaptation of sustainability systems. To support this vision, we identify a number of research challenges to be addressed with particular emphasis on the socio-technical benefits of modeling.

References

  1. M. Acher, P. Collet, F. Fleurey, P. Lahire, S. Moisan, and J.-P. Rigault. Modeling Context and Dynamic Adaptations with Feature Models. In MRT'09, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. N. Bencomo. On the use of software models during software execution. In MISE'09. IEEE, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J.-M. Bruel, B. Combemale, I. Ober, and H. Raynal. MDE in Practice for Computational Science. In ICCS, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. B. Cheng, A. Ramirez, and P. McKinley. Harnessing evolutionary computation to enable dynamically adaptive systems to manage uncertainty. In CMSBSE, pages 1--6. IEEE, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. B. Combemale, J. DeAntoni, B. Baudry, R. B. France, J. Jézéquel, and J. Gray. Globalizing modeling languages. IEEE Computer, 47(6):68--71, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Committee on Computing Research for Environmental and Societal Sustainability. Computing Research for Sustainability. National Academies Press, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. Dean. Power to the people in energy revolution: Eco-batteries will slash household bills. The Times, May 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R. France and B. Rumpe. Model-driven Development of Complex Software: A Research Roadmap. In FOSE'07. IEEE, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Gray, J.-P. Tolvanen, S. Kelly, A. Gokhale, S. Neema, and J. Sprinkle. Domain-specific modeling. In Handbook of Dynamic System Modeling, pages 1--20. CRC Press, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Imperatives. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. B. Morin, F. Fleurey, N. Bencomo, J.-M. Jézéquel, A. Solberg, V. Dehlen, and G. Blair. An aspect-oriented and model-driven approach for managing dynamic variability. In MODELS'08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. Mussbacher, D. Amyot, R. Breu, J.-M. Bruel, B. Cheng, P. Collet, B. Combemale, R. France, R. Heldal, J. Hill, J. Kienzle, M. Sch"ottle, F. Steimann, D. Stikkolorum, and J. Whittle. The Relevance of Model-Driven Engineering Thirty Years from Now. In MODELS'14. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Quarteroni. Mathematical models in science and engineering. Notices of the AMS, 56(1):10--19, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. B. Solomon, D. Ionescu, M. Litoiu, and M. Mihaescu. Model-driven engineering for autonomic provisioned systems. In COMPSAC'08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Thomas and K. Cook, editors. Illuminating the Path: Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. IEEE Press, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. T. Vogel, S. Neumann, S. Hildebrandt, H. Giese, and B. Becker. Model-driven architectural monitoring and adaptation for autonomic systems. In ICAC'09. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. T. Vogel, S. Neumann, S. Hildebrandt, H. Giese, and B. Becker. Incremental model synchronization for efficient run-time monitoring. In Models in Software Engineering, volume 6002 of LNCS, pages 124--139. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    MiSE '16: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Modeling in Software Engineering
    May 2016
    93 pages
    ISBN:9781450341646
    DOI:10.1145/2896982

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 14 May 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate13of30submissions,43%

    Upcoming Conference

    ICSE 2025

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader