Franco Milicchio
ABSTRACT
Accessible tourism seeks to integrate people with impaired abilities --e.g. mobility, vision, hearing-- in travel and leisure activities. The attention to this field has been growing in the past decade, thanks also to technological advancements in smart devices. This paper illustrates the enterprise of accessible tourism applications for smartphones and tablets, tailored for a Deaf Community audience. Specifically, we designed, developed and tested two apps for visiting indoor/outdoor archaeological sites. The apps were implemented for the National Roman Museum Palazzo Massimo, and the open-air archaeological excavation site of Ostia Antica, both in Rome, Italy. The apps are available for free download/use, and have been awarded the European Excellence Award for Accessible Tourism in Brussels, Belgium (2014).
- Darcy, S. and Dickson, T.J., 2009. A Whole-of-Life Approach to Tourism: The Case for Accessible Tourism Experiences. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management 16, 1, 32--44. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/jhtm.16.1.32.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Buhalis, D. and Darcy, S., 2010. Accessible tourism: concepts and issues. Channel View Publications.Google Scholar
- Buhalis, D. and Law, R., 2008. Progress in information technology and tourism management: 20 years on and 10 years after the Internet - The state of eTourism research. Tourism Management 29, 4 (Aug), 609--623. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.01.005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ferri, M.A., 2014. A business model for accessible tourism. Handbook of research on management of cultural products: e-relationship marketing and accessibility perspectives, 287--302.Google Scholar
- Domínguez, T., Fraiz, J.A., and Alén, E., 2013. Economic profitability of accessible tourism for the tourism sector in Spain. Tourism Economics 19, 6, 1385--1399. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.5367/te.2013.0246.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Domínguez Vila, T., Darcy, S., and Alén González, E., 2015. Competing for the disability tourism market -- A comparative exploration of the factors of accessible tourism competitiveness in Spain and Australia. Tourism Management 47, 261--272. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.10.008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Antona, M., Basdekis, I., and Stephanidis, C., 2006. White Paper: promoting Design for All and e-Accessibility in Europe. Universal Access in the Information Society 5, 1, 105--119. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Buhler, C. and Stephanidis, C., 2004. European co-operation activities promoting design for all in information society technologies - Introduction to the special thematic session. Computers Helping People with Special Needs: Proceedings 3118, 80--87.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zajadacz, A. and Śniadek, J., 2013. Tourism Activities of Deaf Poles. In Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, 17. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/pcssr-2013-0010.Google Scholar
- Solvang, P.K. and Haualand, H., 2014. Accessibility and diversity: Deaf space in action. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 16, 1 (2014/01/02), 1--13. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2012.761158.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ruiz, B., Pajares, J.L., Utray, F., and Moreno, L., 2011. Design for All in multimedia guides for museums. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 4 (Jul), 1408--1415. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.044. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Linzer, D., 2013. Learning by Doing: Experiments in Accessible Technology at the Whitney Museum of American Art. Curator-the Museum Journal 56, 3 (Jul), 363--367. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cura.12035.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Goodwin, H., 2013. American Sign Language and Audio Description on the Mobile Guide at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Curator-the Museum Journal 56, 3 (Jul), 369--370. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cura.12036.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Derycke, B., 1994. Deaf Guides in French Museums. Museum International 46, 4, 48--50.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Buhalis, D., Darcy, S., and Ambrose, I., 2012. Best practice in accessible tourism: inclusion, disability, ageing population and tourism. Channel View Publications, Tonawanda, NY.Google Scholar
- Reynolds, C.R. and Fletcher-Janzen, E., 2002. Concise encyclopedia of special education. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
- Lang, H.G., 2000. A phone of our own: the deaf insurrection against Ma Bell. Gallaudet University Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Strauss, K.P., 2006. A new civil right: telecommunications equality for deaf and hard of hearing Americans. Gallaudet University Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Sterling, C.H. and Kittross, J.M., 2002. Stay tuned: a history of American broadcasting. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J.Google Scholar
- Klironomos, I., Antona, M., Basdekis, I., and Stephanidis, C., 2006. White Paper: promoting Design for All and e-Accessibility in Europe. Universal Access in the Information Society 5, 1, 105--119. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-006-0021-4. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pizzuto, E. and Corazza, S., 1996. Noun morphology in Italian sign language (LIS). Lingua 98, 1--3 (Mar), 169--196. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/Doi 10.1016/0024-3841(95)00037-2.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stokoe, W.C., 2005. Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10, 1 (Win), 3--37. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/DOI 10.1093/deafed/eni001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Traxler, C.B., 2000. The Stanford Achievement Test, 9th Edition: National Norming and Performance Standards for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 5, 4 (Autumn), 337--348. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/deafed/5.4.337.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mayer, C., 2007. What really matters in the early literacy development of deaf children. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 12, 4 (Fall), 411--431. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enm020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Miller, P., Kargin, T., and Guldenoglu, B., 2015. Deaf native signers are better readers than nonnative signers: myth or truth? J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 20, 2 (Apr), 147--162. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enu044.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chung, J.-W., Min, H.-J., Kim, J., and Park, J.C., 2013. Enhancing readability of web documents by text augmentation for deaf people. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics (Madrid, Spain2013), ACM, 2479808, 1--10. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2479787.2479808. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Debevc, M., Kosec, P., and Holzinger, A., 2010. Improving multimodal web accessibility for deaf people: sign language interpreter module. Multimedia Tools and Applications 54, 1, 181--199. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11042-010-0529-8. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stephanidis, C., 2009. The Universal Access Handbook. CRC Press, Inc. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pan, J., Wang, J.M., Cao, S.T., and Luo, X.N., 2011. Interactive sign language synthesis based on adaptive display resolution visibility for ubiquitous devices. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 22, 2-3 (Apr-May), 213--220. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cav.409. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Heloir, A., Gibet, S., Multon, F., and Courty, N., 2006. Captured motion data processing for real time synthesis of sign language. Gesture in Human-Computer Interaction and Simulation 3881, 168--171. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kawahigashi, K., Shirai, Y., Miura, J., and Shimada, N., 2006. Automatic synthesis of training data for sign language recognition using HMM. Computers Helping People with Special Needs, Proceedings 4061, 623--626. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Havasi, L. and Szabo, H.M., 2005. A motion capture system for sign language synthesis: Overview and related issues. Advances in Visual Computing, Proceedings 3804, 636--641. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Havasi, L. and Szabo, H.M., 2004. HANDY: Sign language synthesis from sublexical elements based on an XML data representation. Text, Speech and Dialogue, Proceedings 3206, 73--80.Google Scholar
- Sagawa, H., Ohki, M., Sakiyama, T., Oohira, E., Ikeda, H., and Fujisawa, H., 1996. Pattern recognition and synthesis for a sign language translation system. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 7, 1 (Mar), 109--127. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/DOI 10.1006/jvlc.1996.0007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lillo-Martin, D.C., 1991. Universal grammar and American sign language: setting the null argument parameters. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht; Boston.Google Scholar
- Glauert, J., Kennaway, J., Marshall, I., and Safar, E., 2008. Linguistic modelling and language-processing technologies for Avatar-based sign language presentation. Universal Access in the Information Society 6, 4, 375--391. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Efthimiou, E., Caridakis, G., and Karpouzis, K., 2008. A knowledge-based sign synthesis architecture. Universal Access in the Information Society 6, 4, 405--418. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kacorri, H., Lu, P., and Huenerfauth, M., 2013. Evaluating Facial Expressions in American Sign Language Animations for Accessible Online Information. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design Methods, Tools, and Interaction Techniques for eInclusion, C. Stephanidis and M. Antona Eds. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 510--519. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39188-0_55. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lu, P.F. and Huenerfauth, M., 2014. Collecting and evaluating the CUNY ASL corpus for research on American Sign Language animation. Computer Speech and Language 28, 3 (May), 812--831. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2013.10.004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huenerfauth, M. and Lu, P.F., 2012. Effect of spatial reference and verb inflection on the usability of sign language animations. Universal Access in the Information Society 11, 2 (Jun), 169--184. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0247-7. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huenerfauth, M., 2006. Representing coordination and non-coordination in American Sign Language animations. Behaviour & Information Technology 25, 4 (Jul--Aug), 285--295. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01449290600636769.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Akoumianakis, D. and Stephanidis, C., 2005. Using nonfunctional requirements as design drivers for universal access. Universal Access in Health Telematics 3041, 141--155.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Akoumianakis, D. and Stephanidis, C., 2005. Towards a universal access code of practice in health telematics. Universal Access in Health Telematics 3041, 17--35.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stephanidis, C., 2005. Universal access. Universal Access in Health Telematics 3041, 3--8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Akoumianakis, D. and Stephanidis, C., 2003. Scenario-based argumentation for universal access. Universal Access: Theoretical Perspectives, Practice, and Experience 2615, 118--128. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Holzinger, A., 2003. Finger instead of mouse: Touch screens as a means of enhancing universal access. Universal Access: Theoretical Perspectives, Practice, and Experience 2615, 387--397. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cavender, A., Vanam, R., Barney, D.K., Ladner, R.E., and Riskin, E.A., 2008. MobileASL: intelligibility of sign language video over mobile phones. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 3, 1 (Jan), 93--105. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17483100701343475.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ciaramello, F.M. and Hemami, S.S., 2011. A computational intelligibility model for assessment and compression of American sign language video. IEEE Trans Image Process 20, 11 (Nov), 3014--3027. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2011.2132730. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Foulds, R.A., 2004. Biomechanical and perceptual constraints on the bandwidth requirements of sign language. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 12, 1 (Mar), 65--72. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2003.821371.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morris, J. and Mueller, J., 2014. Blind and Deaf Consumer Preferences for Android and iOS Smartphones. In Inclusive Designing, P.M. Langdon, J. Lazar, A. Heylighen and H. Dong Eds. Springer International Publishing, 69--79. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05095-9_7.Google Scholar
- Jones, D.D., 2004. Relative earnings of deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 9, 4 (Fall), 459--461. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enh047.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kipp, M., Nguyen, Q., Heloir, A., and Matthes, S., 2011. Assessing the deaf user perspective on sign language avatars. In Proceedings of the The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (Dundee, Scotland, UK2011), ACM, 2049557, 107--114. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2049536.2049557. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cattani, A., Clibbens, J., and Perfect, T.J., 2007. Visual memory for shapes in deaf signers and nonsigners and in hearing signers and nonsigners: atypical lateralization and enhancement. Neuropsychology 21, 1 (Jan), 114--121. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.21.1.114.Google Scholar
- Krakow, R.A. and Hanson, V.L., 1985. Deaf signers and serial recall in the visual modality: memory for signs, fingerspelling, and print. Mem Cognit 13, 3 (May), 265--272.Google ScholarCross Ref
- McDaniel, E.D., 1980. Visual memory in the deaf. Am Ann Deaf 125, 1 (Feb), 17--20.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Emmorey, K., Damasio, H., McCullough, S., Grabowski, T., Ponto, L.L., Hichwa, R.D., and Bellugi, U., 2002. Neural systems underlying spatial language in American Sign Language. Neuroimage 17, 2 (Oct), 812--824.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pollard, R.Q. and Barnett, S., 2009. Health-related vocabulary knowledge among deaf adults. Rehabil Psychol 54, 2 (May), 182--185. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015771.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Accessible Tourism for the Deaf via Mobile Apps
Recommendations
The Impact of Assistive Technology on Communication Quality Between Deaf and Hearing Individuals
CSCW '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social ComputingDeaf individuals often experience communication difficulties in face-to-face interactions with hearing people. In order to support deaf individuals in such situations, an active stream of assistive technology (AT) research focuses on real-time ...
A Personalizable Mobile Sound Detector App Design for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Users
ASSETS '16: Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and AccessibilitySounds provide informative signals about the world around us. In situations where non-auditory cues are inaccessible, it can be useful for deaf and hard-of-hearing people to be notified about sounds. Through a survey, we explored which sounds are of ...
What Factors Motivate Culturally Deaf People to Want Assistive Technologies?
CHI EA '24: Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsAssistive technologies see high rates of rejection, especially in Deaf communities, due to barriers including cost, discomfort, acclimatization periods, lack of aesthetic appeal, visibility of technology and/or disability, misalignment with user’s ...
Comments