ABSTRACT
The physical position of the display on a monocular OST-HMD in relative to our eye is an important factor of the performance and usability in dual-task scenarios. We investigated 9 different display positions in a modern dual-task scenario with 27 participants. The experiment-involved participants responding to 3 different types of notifications displayed on the HMD while performing a visually intensive primary task. We found that although the notifications at the middle and bottom center positions were noticed quicker, the top and the peripheral positions were more comfortable, unobtrusive, and preferred. In particular, middle-right strikes the best balance between performance and usability in the dual-task scenario we studied. Our findings and discussions demonstrated the need for further work and a more rigorous investigation in dual-task scenarios with characteristics dissimilar to ours.
- Dave A Berque and James T Newman. 2015. GlassClass: Exploring the Design, Implementation, and Acceptance of Google Glass in the Classroom. In Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. Springer, 243--250.Google Scholar
- D. Boghen, B. T. Troost, R. B. Daroff, L. F. Dell'Osso, and J. E. Birkett. 1974. Velocity Characteristics of Normal Human Saccades. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 13, 8: 619--623.Google Scholar
- Fergus W Campbell. 1957. The depth of field of the human eye. Journal of Modern Optics 4, 4: 157--164.Google Scholar
- Xiao Du. 2014. Design and Evaluation of a Learning Assistant System with Optical Head-Mounted Display (OHMD).Google Scholar
- Elise Ackerman. Could Google Glass Hurt Your Eyes? A Harvard Vision Scientist And Project Glass Advisor Responds.Google Scholar
- James Gips, Muhan Zhang, and Deirdre Anderson. 2015. Towards a Google Glass Based Head Control Communication System for People with Disabilities. In HCI International 2015-Posters? Extended Abstracts. Springer, 399--404.Google Scholar
- Anke Huckauf, Mario H. Urbina, Jens Grubert, et al. 2010. Perceptual issues in optical-see-through displays. Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization - APGV '10, ACM Press, 41. http://doi.org/10.1145/1836248.1836255 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yoshio Ishiguro and Jun Rekimoto. 2011. Peripheral vision annotation. In Proc. of - AH '11, ACM Press, 1--5. http://doi.org/10.1145/1959826.1959834Google ScholarDigital Library
- R.M. Katsuyama, D.L. Monk, and E.P. Rolek. Effects of visual display separation upon primary and secondary task performances. In Proc. of IEEE NAECON, IEEE, 758--764. http://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.1989.40297Google ScholarCross Ref
- Meethu Malu and Leah Findlater. 2015. Personalized, Wearable Control of a Head-mounted Display for Users with Upper Body Motor Impairments. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15, ACM Press, 221--230. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702188 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Denys J C Matthies, Marian Haescher, Rebekka Alm, and Bodo Urban. 2015. Properties of a Peripheral Head-Mounted Display (PHMD). In HCI International 2015-Posters? Extended Abstracts. Springer, 208--213.Google Scholar
- D. Scott McCrickard and C. M. Chewar. 2003. Attuning notification design to user goals and attention costs. Communications of the ACM 46, 3: 67. http://doi.org/10.1145/636772.636800 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rísin McNaney, John Vines, Daniel Roggen, et al. 2014. Exploring the acceptability of google glass as an everyday assistive device for people with parkinson's. In Proc. of ACM CHI '14, ACM Press, 2551--2554. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557092 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jason Orlosky, Kiyoshi Kiyokawa, and Haruo Takemura. 2014. Managing mobile text in head mounted displays. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review 18, 2: 20--31. http://doi.org/10.1145/2636242.2636246 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harold Pashler. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory.Google Scholar
- Jonathan S Pointer. 2007. The absence of lateral congruency between sighting dominance and the eye with better visual acuity. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 27, 1: 106--110.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dario D. Salvucci, Daniel Markley, Mark Zuber, and Duncan P. Brumby. 2007. iPod distraction. In Proc. of ACM CHI '07, ACM Press, 243. http://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240665Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert A Sottilare. 2015. Augmented Cognition on the Run: Considerations for the Design and Authoring of Mobile Tutoring Systems. In Foundations of Augmented Cognition. Springer, 683--689.Google Scholar
- Enrico Tanuwidjaja, Derek Huynh, Kirsten Koa, et al. 2014. Chroma: A Wearable Augmented-Reality Solution for Color Blindness. In Proc. of UBICOMP '14. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Google Glass Tech Specs Page. Retrieved from https://support.google.com/glass/answer/3064128?hl=enGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Positioning Glass: Investigating Display Positions of Monocular Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Display
Recommendations
Occlusion based interaction methods for tangible augmented reality environments
VRCAI '04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGGRAPH international conference on Virtual Reality continuum and its applications in industryTraditional Tangible Augmented Reality (Tangible AR) interfaces combine a mixture of tangible user interface and augmented reality technology, complementing each other for novel interaction methods and real world anchored visualization. However, well ...
Designing Technology for an Aging Population
CHI EA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe population of the developed world is aging. Most websites, apps, and digital devices are used by adults aged 50+ as well as by younger adults, so they should be designed accordingly. This course, based on the presenter's new book, presents age-...
Designing for an Aging Population: Toward Universal Design
CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThis course describes age-related factors that affect ability to use the Web, and presents Web design guidelines that reflect the capabilities, usage patterns, and preferences of older Web users. The course also explains the value of testing websites on ...
Comments