skip to main content
10.1145/2948708.2948713acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschinese-chiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Positioning Glass: Investigating Display Positions of Monocular Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Display

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 May 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The physical position of the display on a monocular OST-HMD in relative to our eye is an important factor of the performance and usability in dual-task scenarios. We investigated 9 different display positions in a modern dual-task scenario with 27 participants. The experiment-involved participants responding to 3 different types of notifications displayed on the HMD while performing a visually intensive primary task. We found that although the notifications at the middle and bottom center positions were noticed quicker, the top and the peripheral positions were more comfortable, unobtrusive, and preferred. In particular, middle-right strikes the best balance between performance and usability in the dual-task scenario we studied. Our findings and discussions demonstrated the need for further work and a more rigorous investigation in dual-task scenarios with characteristics dissimilar to ours.

References

  1. Dave A Berque and James T Newman. 2015. GlassClass: Exploring the Design, Implementation, and Acceptance of Google Glass in the Classroom. In Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality. Springer, 243--250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. D. Boghen, B. T. Troost, R. B. Daroff, L. F. Dell'Osso, and J. E. Birkett. 1974. Velocity Characteristics of Normal Human Saccades. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 13, 8: 619--623.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Fergus W Campbell. 1957. The depth of field of the human eye. Journal of Modern Optics 4, 4: 157--164.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Xiao Du. 2014. Design and Evaluation of a Learning Assistant System with Optical Head-Mounted Display (OHMD).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Elise Ackerman. Could Google Glass Hurt Your Eyes? A Harvard Vision Scientist And Project Glass Advisor Responds.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. James Gips, Muhan Zhang, and Deirdre Anderson. 2015. Towards a Google Glass Based Head Control Communication System for People with Disabilities. In HCI International 2015-Posters? Extended Abstracts. Springer, 399--404.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Anke Huckauf, Mario H. Urbina, Jens Grubert, et al. 2010. Perceptual issues in optical-see-through displays. Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization - APGV '10, ACM Press, 41. http://doi.org/10.1145/1836248.1836255 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Yoshio Ishiguro and Jun Rekimoto. 2011. Peripheral vision annotation. In Proc. of - AH '11, ACM Press, 1--5. http://doi.org/10.1145/1959826.1959834Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R.M. Katsuyama, D.L. Monk, and E.P. Rolek. Effects of visual display separation upon primary and secondary task performances. In Proc. of IEEE NAECON, IEEE, 758--764. http://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.1989.40297Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Meethu Malu and Leah Findlater. 2015. Personalized, Wearable Control of a Head-mounted Display for Users with Upper Body Motor Impairments. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15, ACM Press, 221--230. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702188 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Denys J C Matthies, Marian Haescher, Rebekka Alm, and Bodo Urban. 2015. Properties of a Peripheral Head-Mounted Display (PHMD). In HCI International 2015-Posters? Extended Abstracts. Springer, 208--213.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. D. Scott McCrickard and C. M. Chewar. 2003. Attuning notification design to user goals and attention costs. Communications of the ACM 46, 3: 67. http://doi.org/10.1145/636772.636800 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Rísin McNaney, John Vines, Daniel Roggen, et al. 2014. Exploring the acceptability of google glass as an everyday assistive device for people with parkinson's. In Proc. of ACM CHI '14, ACM Press, 2551--2554. http://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557092 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jason Orlosky, Kiyoshi Kiyokawa, and Haruo Takemura. 2014. Managing mobile text in head mounted displays. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review 18, 2: 20--31. http://doi.org/10.1145/2636242.2636246 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Harold Pashler. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jonathan S Pointer. 2007. The absence of lateral congruency between sighting dominance and the eye with better visual acuity. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 27, 1: 106--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Dario D. Salvucci, Daniel Markley, Mark Zuber, and Duncan P. Brumby. 2007. iPod distraction. In Proc. of ACM CHI '07, ACM Press, 243. http://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240665Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Robert A Sottilare. 2015. Augmented Cognition on the Run: Considerations for the Design and Authoring of Mobile Tutoring Systems. In Foundations of Augmented Cognition. Springer, 683--689.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Enrico Tanuwidjaja, Derek Huynh, Kirsten Koa, et al. 2014. Chroma: A Wearable Augmented-Reality Solution for Color Blindness. In Proc. of UBICOMP '14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Google Glass Tech Specs Page. Retrieved from https://support.google.com/glass/answer/3064128?hl=enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Positioning Glass: Investigating Display Positions of Monocular Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Display

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      Chinese CHI '16: Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium of Chinese CHI
      May 2016
      59 pages
      ISBN:9781450347600
      DOI:10.1145/2948708

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 May 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate17of40submissions,43%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader