- 1 Courtemanche, A.J., and Ceranowicz, A. ModSAF development status. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavioural Representation. (May 9-11, Orlando Fla.). Institute for Simulation and Training, 1995, 3-13.Google Scholar
- 2 Hepplewhite, R.T., and Baxter, J.W. Broad agents for intelligent simulation. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavioural Representation. (July 23-25, Orlando, Fla.) Institute of Simulation and Training. 1996. 319-327.Google Scholar
- 3 Hill, R., Chen, J., Gratch, J., Rosenbloom, P., and Tambe, M. Intelligent agents for the synthetic battlefield: A company of rotary wing aircraft. In Proceedings of AAAI97 and IAAAI97 (July 27-31, Providence, R.I.). AAAI Press, 1997, 1006-1012. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Agents in tank battle simulations
Recommendations
Integration of simulations, battle command, and technology
SIW '09: Proceedings of the 2009 SISO European Simulation Interoperability WorkshopThe 2008 SIMCI Combined project resulted in a successful robust demonstration of integration of Battle Command, Simulations, and emerging Technology. The 2009 SIMCI Combined project is being executed by a team from Project Manager Battle Command (PM BC),...
Military route planning in battle field simulations for a multi-agent system
Special Supplement Issue in Section A and B: Selected Papers from the ISCA International Conference on Software Engineering and Data Engineering, 2009As the army continues to develop virtual systems for combative support missions, it needs to also develop representations of intelligent systems for its battlefield simulations. Military route planning is a challenging problem in many domains such as ...
Extensible Battle Management Language as a Transformation Enabler
This article addresses a new approach to the longstanding problem of interoperating military command and control with combat simulations. There is great potential benefit in such a capability, both for more effective training and as a "what if" ...
Comments