skip to main content
10.1145/2961111.2962617acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Monitoring Software Quality by Means of Simulation Methods

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The evolution of software projects is driven by developers who are in control of the developed artifacts and the quality of software projects depends on the work of participating developers. Thus, a simulation tool requires a suitable model of the commit behavior of different developer types. In this paper, we present an agent-based model for software processes containing the commit behavior for different developer types. The description of these types results from mining software repositories. Since relationships between software entities, e.g., files, classes, modules, axe represented as dependency graphs, simulation results can be assessed automatically by Conditional Random Fields (CRFs). By adjusting simulation parameters for one project we are able to give a quality trend of other projects similar in size and duration only by changing the effort and the size of other projects to simulate.

References

  1. N. Nagappan, B. Murphy, and V. Basili, "The influence of organizational structure on software quality: An empirical case study," in Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. F. Rahman and P. Devanbu, "Ownership, experience and defects: A fine-grained study of authorship," in Proc. of the 33rd Intern. Conf. on Softw. Eng. (ICSE), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Ali and M. O. Elish, "A comparative literature survey of design patterns impact on software quality," in 2013 International Conference on Information Science and Applications (ICISA), June 2013, pp. 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. N. Smith and J. F. Ramil, "Agent-based simulation of open source evolution," in Software Process Improvement and Practice, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. Catal, "Software fault prediction: A literature review and current trends," Expert Systems with Applications, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. P. Bhattacharya, M. Iliofotou, I. Neamtiu, and M. Faloutsos, "Graph-based analysis and prediction for software evolution," in Proceedings of the 34th Intem.Conf. on Softw. Eng. (ICSE). IEEE, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Y. Wang, Prediction of Success in Open Source Software Development. University of California, Davis, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. V. Honsel, D. Honsel, and J. Grabowski, "Software process simulation based on mining software repositories," in ICDM Workshop, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. V. Honsel, D. Honsel, S. Herbold, J. Grabowski, and S. Waack, "Mining software dependency networks for agent-based simulation of software evolution," in ASE Workshop, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. L. Yu and S. Ramaswamy, "Mining cvs repositories to understand open-source project developer roles," in Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. G. Gousios, E. Kalliamvakou, and D. Spinellis, "Measuring developer contribution from software repository data," in Proceedings of the 2008 International Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. Kim, E. J. Whitehead, and Y. Zhang, "Classifying Software Changes: Clean or Buggy?" Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Fortunato, "Community detection in graphs," Physics Reports, vol. 486, no. 3-5, pp. 75--174, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. S. Trueg, "K3b -- The CD/DVD Kreator for Linux," http://www.k3b.org/, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. J. North, N. T. Collier, J. Ozik, E. R. Tatara, C. M. Macal, M. Bragen, and P. Sydelko, "Complex adaptive systems modeling with repast simphony," Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. L. Hattori and M. Lanza, "On the nature of commits." in ASE Workshops. IEEE, 2008, pp. 63--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. E. Ising, "Beitrag zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus," Zeitschrift für Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei, 1925.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Apache.org, "Log4j," http://logging.apache.org/log4j, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. kde.org, "Kate," https://www.kde.org/applications/utilities/kate/, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. M. Foucault, M. Palyart, X. Blanc, G. C. Murphy, and J.-R. Falleri, "Impact of developer turnover on quality in open-source software," in Proceedings of the 2015 10th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. A. Bachmann, C. Bird, F. Rahman, P. T. Devanbu, and A. Bernstein, "The missing links: bugs and bug-fix commits." in SIGSOFT FSE, G.-C. Roman and K. J. Sullivan, Eds. ACM, 2010, pp. 97--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. G. Weiss, Multiagent Systems. MIT Press, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ESEM '16: Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
    September 2016
    457 pages
    ISBN:9781450344272
    DOI:10.1145/2961111

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 8 September 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    ESEM '16 Paper Acceptance Rate27of122submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate130of594submissions,22%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader