skip to main content
10.1145/2971485.2971555acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Starring into the void?: Classifying Internal vs. External Attention from EEG

Published:23 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

For any HCI system, it would be a great advantage if it was aware of the attentional state of its user: Is he or she paying attention to external stimuli provided by the user's environment or is the user focusing his or her attention on internal mental tasks? In this paper, we propose a model for the discrimination of internal and external attention by using Electroencephalography. We describe the experiment we conducted to collect data of internal and external attention, describe our setup for classification and discuss the classifications results.

References

  1. Benedek, M., Schickel, R. J., Jauk, E., Fink, A., and Neubauer, A. C. Alpha power increases in right parietal cortex reflects focused internal attention. Neuropsychologia 56 (2014-04), 393--400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Braboszcz, C., and Delorme, A. Lost in thoughts: Neural markers of low alertness during mind wandering. NeuroImage 54, 4 (2011-02-14), 3040--3047.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D., and Turk-Browne, N. B. A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual Review of Psychology 62, 1 (2011), 73--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Cooper, N. R., Croft, R. J., Dominey, S. J. J., Burgess, A. P., and Gruzelier, J. H. Paradox lost? exploring the role of alpha oscillations during externally vs. internally directed attention and the implications for idling and inhibition hypotheses. International Journal of Psychophysiology 47, 1 (2003-01), 65--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. D'Mello, S., and Kory, J. Consistent but modest: a meta-analysis on unimodal and multimodal affect detection accuracies from 30 studies. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on Multimodal interaction (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Donchin, E., Spencer, K., and Wijesinghe, R. The mental prosthesis: assessing the speed of a p300-based brain-computer interface. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 8, 2 (2000-06), 174--179.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Haufe, S., Meinecke, F., Görgen, K., Dähne, S., Haynes, J.-D., Blankertz, B., and Bießmann, F. On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging. NeuroImage 87 (2014), 96--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hild, J., Putze, F., Kaufman, D., Kühnle, C., Schultz, T., and Beyerer, J. Spatio-temporal event selection in basic surveillance tasks using eye tracking and EEG. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Eye Gaze in Intelligent Human Machine Interaction: Eye-Gaze & Multimodality, ACM (2014), 3--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jhansi, N., and Krishna, P. V. Meditation and attention regulation. Journal of Indian Psychology 14, 1 (1996), 26--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Klimesch, W. EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Research Reviews 29, 2 (1999), 169--195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Mueller-Putz, G., Scherer, R., Brunner, C., Leeb, R., and Pfurtscheller, G. Better than random: A closer look on BCI results. International Journal of Bioelectromagnetism 10 (2008), 52--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ordikhani-Seyedlar, M., Sorensen, H., Kjaer, T., Siebner, H., and Puthusserypady, S. SSVEP-modulation by covert and overt attention: Novel features for BCI in attention neuro-rehabilitation. In 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (2014), 5462--5465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Putze, F., Hesslinger, S., Tse, C.-Y., Huang, Y., Herff, C., Guan, C., and Schultz, T. Hybrid fNIRS-EEG based classification of auditory and visual perception processes. Frontiers in neuroscience 8 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Putze, F., Hild, J., Kärgel, R., Herff, C., Redmann, A., Beyerer, J., and Schultz, T. Locating user attention using eye tracking and EEG for spatio-temporal event selection. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Stiefelhagen, R., Yang, J., and Waibel, A. Modeling focus of attention for meeting indexing based on multiple cues. Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on 13, 4 (2002), 928--938. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Welch, P. D. The use of fast fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics 15, 2 (1967), 70--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Starring into the void?: Classifying Internal vs. External Attention from EEG

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      NordiCHI '16: Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
      October 2016
      1045 pages
      ISBN:9781450347631
      DOI:10.1145/2971485

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 October 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      NordiCHI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate58of231submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate379of1,572submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader