skip to main content
10.1145/3017680.3017761acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Empirical Study of Debugging Patterns Among Novices Programmers

Published:08 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Students taking introductory computer science courses often have difficulty with the debugging process. This work investigates a number of different logical errors that novice programmers encounter and the associated debugging behaviors. Data is collected and analyzed data in two different experiments from 142 subjects. The results show some errors are more difficult than others. Different types of bugs and novices' debugging behaviors are identified. Years of experience showed a significant role in the process of debugging in terms of correctness level and time required for debugging

References

  1. M. Ahmadzadeh, D. Elliman and C. Higgins, "An analysis of patterns of debugging among novice," SIGCSE, pp. 84--88, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Ahmadzadeh, D. Elliman and C. Higgins, "The impact of improving debugging skill on programming ability," ITALICS, p.72--87, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. R. Bryce, A. Cooley, A. Hansen, and N. Hayrapetyan, "A one year empirical study of student programming bugs," The Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 122--127. IEEE, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. H. Danielsiek, W. Paul and J. Vahrenhold, "Detecting and understanding students' misconceptions related to algorithms and data structures," ACM SIGCSE, 2012, North Carolina, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Ducassé, A.-M. Emde, "A review of automated debugging systems: knowledge, strategies and techniques," The 10th international conference on Software engineering, p.162--171, April 11--15, 1988, Singapore. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Ford and T. Teorey, "Practical debugging in C++," Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Hristova, A. Misra, M. Rutter, and R. Mercuri. "Identifying and correcting Java programming errors for introductory computer science students," ACM SIGCSE, pp. 153--156, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Jackson, M. Cobb and C. Carver, "Identifying top java errors for novice programmers," The 35th Annual Conference Frontiers in Education (FIE), pp. T4C-24-T4C-27, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. W. Johnson, E. Soloway, B. Cutler and S. Draper, "Bug catalogue: I," Technical report, Yale University, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. C. M. Lewis and C. Gregg, "How do you teach debugging?: resources and strategies for better student debugging," ACM SIGCSE, pp. 706--706, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. R. McCartney, A. Eckerdal , J. E. Mostrom , K. Sanders , C. Zander, "Successful students' strategies for getting unstuck," The 12th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, 2007, Dundee, Scotland Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. L. Murphy, G. Lewandowski , R. McCauley , B. Simon , L. Thomas , C. Zander, "Debugging: the good, the bad, and the quirky - a qualitative analysis of novices' strategies, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.40 n.1, March 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D.W. Perkins, C. Hancock, R. Hobbs, F. Martin and R. Simmons, "Conditions of learning in novice programmers". Educational Technology Center, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. D. N. Perkins, F. Martin, "Fragile knowledge and neglected strategies in novice programmers", workshop on empirical studies of programmers on Empirical studies of programmers, p.213--229, June 1986, Washington, D.C., USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A.H. Rosbach and A.H. Bagge, "Classifying and measuring student problems and misconceptions," Proc. of Norsk informa-tikkonferanse (NIK), pp. 110--121, Akademika Forlag, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. C. Spohrer, E. Soloway and E. Pope, "A goal-plan analysis of buggy Pascal programs", Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 163--207, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An Empirical Study of Debugging Patterns Among Novices Programmers

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGCSE '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
    March 2017
    838 pages
    ISBN:9781450346986
    DOI:10.1145/3017680

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 8 March 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    SIGCSE '17 Paper Acceptance Rate105of348submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

    Upcoming Conference

    SIGCSE Virtual 2024

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader