skip to main content
10.1145/3022227.3022233acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicuimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Toward accessibility with usability: understanding the requirements of impaired uses in the mobile context

Published:05 January 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

When applications intend to support accessibility, aspects of usability must be reviewed to adapt or extend common functional requirements that are implemented to ensure an easy use of applications. However, initiatives to develop guidelines for accessible mobile applications are recent and several approaches present only suggestions rather than a concrete list of requirements. This work presents an ample study on this subject, analyzing 247 scientific and technical articles to identify requirements that are discussed related to different types of impairments. This identification and further consolidation are carried out in a contextualized way via a classification schema proposed in this work. An observation based on analysis with real users is then performed to confirm and extend the initial requirements list and support our understanding about the limitations and needs of impaired users regarding the use of mobile technology. As result, this paper presents the main points of a guideline proposal for functional requirements, which should be considered by mobile applications to ensure accessibility with usability.

References

  1. Fanucci, L., Iacopetti, F., Roncella, R., 2011. A console interface for game accessibility to people with motor impairments. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Consumer Eletronics (ICCE), pp. 206--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Carvajal, L., Moreno, A., Sánchez-Segura, M., Seffah, A., 2013. Usability through Software Design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 39(11):1582--1596. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Khan, S., Tahir, M., Raza, A., 2013. Usability Issues for Smartphone Users with Special Needs-Autism. Int. Conf. on Open Source Systems and Technologies, pp. 107--113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kane, S., Wobbrock, J., Ladner, R., 2011. Usable gestures for blind people: understanding preference and performance. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 413--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Mi, N., Cavuoto, L., Benson, K., Smith-Jackson, T., Nussbaum, M., 2014. A heuristic checklist for an accessible smartphone interface design. Universal Access in the Information Society, 13(4):351--365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Android. 2015. Accessibility Developer, http://developer.android.com/guide/topics/ui/accessibilitychecklist.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. W3C. 2015. Mobile Accessibility: How WCAG 2.0 and Other W3C/WAI Guidelines Apply to Mobile, http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-accessibility-mappingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Siebra, C., et al., 2015. Accessibility Devices for Mobile Interfaces Extensions: A Survey. Proc. of the 17th ACM International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 644--651. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Shin, D. 2016. Cross-platform user experience towards designing an inter-usable system. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(7):503--514.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lescal, D., Caron, L., Rouat, J., 2012. Neural visual objects enhancement for sensorial substitution from vision to audition. Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Information Sciences, Signal Processing and their Applications, pp. 1074--1079.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Bowman, V., 2002. Reading between the lines: an evaluation of Window Eyes Screen reader as a reference tool for teaching and learning, Library Hi Tech, 20(2): 162--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ganz, A., Schafer, J., Puleo, E., Wilson, C., Robertson, M., 2012. Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of PERCEPT Indoor Navigation System for Visually Impaired Users. Proc. of the 34th Annual Int. Conf. of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 5815--5818.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Dim, N., Ren, X., 2014. Designing motion gesture interfaces in mobile phones for blind people. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 29(5): 812--824.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. McGookin, D., Brewster, S., Jiang, W., 2008. Investigating touchscreen accessibility for people with visual impairments. Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridges, pp. 298--307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ananto, B., Sari, R., Harwahyu, R., 2011. Color Transformation for color Blind Compensation on Augmented Reality System. Proceedings of the International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr), pp. 129--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Ahmetovic, D., 2013. Smartphone-assisted mobility in urban environments for visually impaired users through computer vision and sensor fusion. Proceedings of the IEEE 14th Int. Conference on Mobile Data Management, vol. 2, pp. 15--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Faria, J., Lopes, S., Fernandes, H., Martins, P., Barroso, J., 2010. Electronic white cane for blind people navigation assistance, World Automation Congress, TSI Press, pp. 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim, J., Bessho, M., Koshizuka, N., Sakamura, K., 2014. Mobile Applications for Assisting Mobility for the Visually Impaired Using IoT Infrastructure. TRON Symposium, p.1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin, K., Lau, T., Cheuk, C., Liu, Y., 2012. A Wearable Stereo Vision System for Visually Impaired. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, pp. 1423--1428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Korbel, P., Skulimowski, P., Wasilewski, P., Wawrzyniak, P., 2013. Mobile Applications Aiding the Visually Impaired in Travelling with Public Transport. Proceedings of the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), pp. 825--828.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ludi, S., Canter, A., Ellis, L., Shrestha, A., 2012. Requirements Gathering for Assistive Technology That Includes Low Vision and Sighted Users. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Usability and Accessibility Focused Requirements Engineering, pp. 25--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Araujo, E., 2012. Accessibility Requirements for Deaf in Mobile Learning Environments: Recommendations for Interface, Master Dissertation in Computer Science, UFPE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ayag, D., Bautista, R., Eala, M., Feria, R., 2013. Acceptability of Hear-O as a mobile hearing screening tool. Proc. of the 4th IEEE Int. Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA), pp. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Boulares, M., Jemni, M., 2013. Toward a mobile service for hard of hearing people to make information accessible anywhere. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Software Applications, pp. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Mielke, M., Grunewald, A., Bruck, R., 2013. An assistive technology for hearing-impaired persons: Analysis, requirements and architecture. Proceedings of the 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 4702--4705.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Kim, J., Huo, X., Ghovanloo, N., 2010. Wireless control of smartphones with tongue motion using tongue drive assistive technology. Annual Int. Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 5250--5253.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Mulhern, N., McCaffrey, N., Beretta, N., Chabot, E., Sun, Y., 2013. Designing Android Applications Using Voice Controlled Commands: For Hands Free Interaction with Common Household Devices. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference, pp. 265--266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Park, H., Kim, J., Huo, X., Hwang, I., Ghovanloo, M., 2011. New ergonomic headset for tongue-drive system with wireless smartphone interface. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 7344--7347.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Cofre, J., Moraga, G., Rusu, C., Mercado, I., Inostroza, R., Jimenez, C., 2012. Developing a Touchscreen-based Domotic Tool for Users with Motor Disabilities. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information Technology - New Generations (ITNG), pp. 696--701. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Greeff, M., Kotze, P., 2007. Individual difficulties faced by persons with mobility impairments. Proc. of the IADIS Int. Conference on Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Tidwell, J., 2010. Designing Interfaces: Patterns for Effective Interaction Design, 2nd Edition. O'Reilly Media Publisher. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Löchtefeld, M., Schardt, P., Krüger, A., Boring, S., 2015. Detecting users handedness for ergonomic adaptation of mobile user interfaces. Proc. 14th ACM Int. Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, pp. 245--249. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Kjeldskov, J., Stage, J., 2004. New techniques for usability evaluation of mobile systems. International Journal on Human-Computer Studies, 60(5--6):599--620.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Heo, J., Ham, D., Park, S., Song, C., Yoon, W., 2009. A framework for evaluating the usability of mobile phones based on multi-level, hierarchical model of usability factors. Interacting with Computers, 21(4):263--275. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Fickas, S., Sohlberg, M., Hung, P., 2008. Route-following assistance for travelers with cognitive impairments: A comparison of four prompt modes. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(12):876--888. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Chien, M., Jheng, C., Lin, N., Tang, H., Taele, P., Tseng, W., Chen, M., 2015. iCAN: A tablet-based pedagogical system for improving communication skills of children with autism. Int. Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 73, pp. 79--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Toward accessibility with usability: understanding the requirements of impaired uses in the mobile context

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IMCOM '17: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication
      January 2017
      746 pages
      ISBN:9781450348881
      DOI:10.1145/3022227

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 January 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      IMCOM '17 Paper Acceptance Rate113of366submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate213of621submissions,34%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader