Jermain Kaminski
ABSTRACT
In this work, we analyze video pitches of creators in crowdfunding campaigns and focus on linguistic particularities of "lead user" entrepreneurs. Theory suggests that lead users sense needs long before they become known to the broader public and would benefit greatly from finding a solution to these needs. For our study, we consider 537 video pitches of creators on Kickstarter, distinguishing lead users and regular campaigners. The study employs natural language processing (NLP) analysis of (video-to-)speech-to-text content. Initial results indicate that lead users are more oriented towards product and problem-solving rather than focusing on pecuniary motives.
Supplemental Material
- Tim Althoff, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and Dan Jurafsky. 2014. How to ask for a favor: A case study on the success of altruistic requests. arXiv preprint arXiv:1405.3282 (2014).Google Scholar
- Erkko Autio, Linus Dahlander, and Lars Frederiksen. 2013. Information exposure, opportunity evaluation, and entrepreneurial action: An investigation of an online user community. Academy of Management Journal 56, 5 (2013), 1348--1371. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nihit Desai, Raghav Gupta, and Karen Truong. 2016. Plead or Pitch? The Role of Language in Kickstarter Project Success. (2016). http://nlp.stanford.edu/courses/ cs224n/2015/reports/15.pdf.Google Scholar
- Nikolaus Franke, Eric Von Hippel, and Martin Schreier. 2006. Finding commercially attractive user innovations: A test of lead-user theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management 23, 4 (2006), 301--315. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael D Greenberg, Bryan Pardo, Karthic Hariharan, and Elizabeth Gerber. 2013. Crowdfunding support tools: predicting success & failure. In CHI'13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1815--1820.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stefan Haefliger, Peter Jäger, and Georg Von Krogh. 2010. Under the radar: Industry entry by user entrepreneurs. Research Policy 39, 9 (2010), 1198-- 1213. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rebecca Henderson. 1993. Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. The RAND Journal of Economics (1993), 248--270. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kickstarter.com. 2017. Statistics. (2017). https: //www.kickstarter.com/help/stats.Google Scholar
- Andrew L Maxwell, Scott A Jeffrey, and Moren Lévesque. 2011. Business angel early stage decision making. Journal of Business Venturing 26, 2 (2011), 212--225.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tanushree Mitra and Eric Gilbert. 2014. The language that gets people to give: Phrases that predict success on kickstarter. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM, 49--61.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ethan Mollick. 2014. The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing 29, 1 (2014), 1--16. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ethan Mollick and Ramana Nanda. 2015. Wisdom or madness? Comparing crowds with expert evaluation in funding the arts. Management Science 62, 6 (2015), 1533--1553. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. W. Pennebaker and M. E. Francis. 1999. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Jeffrey M Pollack, Matthew W Rutherford, and Brian G Nagy. 2012. Preparedness and cognitive legitimacy as antecedents of new venture funding in televised business pitches. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 36, 5 (2012), 915--939.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Josue Reyes and Cristina Bahm. 2016. Crowdfunding: Applying Collective Indexing of Emotions to Campaign Videos. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion. ACM, 385--388. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sonali K Shah and Mary Tripsas. 2007. The accidental entrepreneur: The emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 1, 1--2 (2007), 123--140.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael L Tushman and Philip Anderson. 1986. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative science quarterly (1986), 439-- 465.Google Scholar
- Glen L Urban and Eric Von Hippel. 1988. Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products. Management Science 34, 5 (1988), 569--582. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eric Von Hippel. 2005. Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft 55, 1 (2005), 63--78. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eric Von Hippel, Susumu Ogawa, and Jeroen PJ De Jong. 2011. The age of the consumer-innovator. MIT Sloan Management Review 53, 1 (2011), 27.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Do User Entrepreneurs Speak Different?: Applying Natural Language Processing to Crowdfunding Videos
Recommendations
The language that gets people to give: phrases that predict success on kickstarter
CSCW '14: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computingCrowdfunding sites like Kickstarter--where entrepreneurs and artists look to the internet for funding--have quickly risen to prominence. However, we know very little about the factors driving the 'crowd' to take projects to their funding goal. In this ...
Enriching living lab-approaches for ICT-innovation by introducing different user roles: the case of digital TV
EuroITV '10: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Interactive TV and VideoWe can characterize the contemporary ICT-environment as an innovation spiral, with more and more innovative products, services and applications coming to the market, but also with a growing number of them not able to reach mass market or even a large ...
Resistance to crowdfunding among entrepreneurs
Entrepreneurs' resistance to crowdfunding is considered in terms of impression management.A case study of entrepreneurs in the Republic of Ireland is performed.Fears around disclosure, visible failure, and projecting desperation are identified.A refined ...
Comments