skip to main content
10.1145/3091478.3091513acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Using Facebook Ads Audiences for Global Lifestyle Disease Surveillance: Promises and Limitations

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Every day, millions of users reveal their interests on Facebook, which are then monetized via targeted advertisement marketing campaigns. In this paper, we explore the use of demographically rich Facebook Ads audience estimates for tracking non-communicable diseases around the world. Across 47 countries, we compute the audiences of marker interests, and evaluate their potential in tracking health conditions associated with tobacco use, obesity, and diabetes, compared to the performance of placebo interests. Despite its huge potential, we find that, for modeling prevalence of health conditions across countries, differences in these interest audiences are only weakly indicative of the corresponding prevalence rates. Within the countries, however, our approach provides interesting insights on trends of health awareness across demographic groups. Finally, we provide a temporal error analysis to expose the potential pitfalls of using Facebook's Marketing API as a black box.

References

  1. Jisun An and Ingmar Weber. 2015. Whom should we sense in "social sensing"- analyzing which users work best for social media now-casting. EPJ Data Science 4, 1 (2015), 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Matheus Araujo, Yelena Mejova, Michael Aupetit, and Ingmar Weber. 2017. Visualizing Health Awareness in the Middle East. In ICWSM. to appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Yan Carriere-Swallow and Felipe Labbé. 2013. Nowcasting with Google Trends' in an emerging market. Journal of Forecasting 32, 4 (2013), 289--298.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Rumi Chunara, Lindsay Bouton, John W. Ayers, and John S. Brownstein. 2013. Assessing the Online Social Environment for Surveillance of Obesity Prevalence. PLoS ONE 8, 4 (04 2013), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Elia Gabarron, Luis Fernandez-Luque, and others. 2017. Impact of Facebook Ads for Sexual Health Promotion Via an Educational Web App: A Case Study. IJEHMC 8, 2 (2017), 18--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jeremy Ginsberg and others. 2009. Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature 457, 7232 (2 2009), 1012--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Steven Gittelman, Victor Lange, A. Carol Gotway Crawford, A. Catherine Okoro, Eugene Lieb, S. Satvinder Dhingra, and Elaine Trimarchi. 2015. A New Source of Data for Public Health Surveillance: Facebook Likes. JMIR 17, 4 (2015), e98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. Gomide, A. Veloso, W. Meira Jr., V. Almeida, F. Benevenuto, F. Ferraz, and M. Teixeira. 2011. Dengue surveillance based on a computational model of spatio-temporal locality of Twitter. In WebSci. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. L. Brianna Haskins and others. 2017. Health Evaluation and Referral Assistant: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Web-Based Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment System to Reduce Risky Alcohol Use Among Emergency Department Patients. JMIR 19, 5 (May 2017), e119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Taha A. Kass-Hout and Hend Alhinnawi. 2013. Social media in public health. British Medical Bulletin 108, 1 (2013), 5--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Yoonsang Kim, Jidong Huang, and Sherry Emery. 2016. Garbage in, Garbage Out: Data Collection, Quality Assessment and Reporting Standards for Social Media Data Use in Health Research, Infodemiology and Digital Disease Detection. JMIR 18, 2 (26 Feb 2016), e41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. David Lazer, Ryan Kennedy, Gary King, and Alessandro Vespignani. 2014. The parable of Google flu: traps in big data analysis. Science 343, 6176 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Yabing Liu, Chloe Kliman-Silver, Robert Bell, Balachander Krishnamurthy, and Alan Mislove. 2014. Measurement and analysis of osn ad auctions. In COSN. 139--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Christopher J.L. Murray and Alan D. Lopez. 1997. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990--2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 349 (1997), 1498--1504. Issue 9064.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Tobias Preis and Helen Susannah Moat. 2014. Adaptive nowcasting of influenza outbreaks using Google searches. Royal Society Open Science 1, 2 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Ben Y Reis and John S Brownstein. 2010. Measuring the impact of health policies using Internet search patterns: the case of abortion. BMC public health 10 (2010), 514.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Diego Saez-Trumper, Yabing Liu, Ricardo Baeza-Yates, Balachander Krishnamurthy, and Alan Mislove. 2014. Beyond cpm and cpc: Determining the value of users on osns. In COSN. 161--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Koustuv Saha, Ingmar Weber, Michael L. Birnbaum, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2017. Characterizing Awareness of Schizophrenia Among Facebook Users by Leveraging Facebook Advertisement Estimates. JMIR 19, 5 (2017), e156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Elad Yom-Tov and Luis Fernandez-Luque. 2014. Information is in the eye of the beholder: Seeking information on the MMR vaccine through an Internet search engine. AMIA Symposium 2014 (2014), 1238--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Using Facebook Ads Audiences for Global Lifestyle Disease Surveillance: Promises and Limitations

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            WebSci '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference
            June 2017
            438 pages
            ISBN:9781450348966
            DOI:10.1145/3091478

            Copyright © 2017 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 25 June 2017

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • short-paper

            Acceptance Rates

            WebSci '17 Paper Acceptance Rate30of85submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate218of875submissions,25%

            Upcoming Conference

            Websci '24
            16th ACM Web Science Conference
            May 21 - 24, 2024
            Stuttgart , Germany

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader