skip to main content
10.1145/3139513.3139524acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open Access

A multimodal serious-game to teach fractions in primary school

Published:13 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Multisensory learning is considered a relevant pedagogical framework for education since a very long time and several authors support the use of a multisensory and kinesthetic approach in children learning. Moreover, results from psychophysics and developmental psychology show that children have a preferential sensory channel to learn specific concepts (spatial and/or temporal), hence a further evidence for the need of a multisensory approach. In this work, we present an example of serious game for learning a particularly complicated mathematical concept: fractions. The main novelty of our proposal comes from the role covered by the communication between sensory modalities in particular, movement, vision, and sound. The game has been developed in the context of the EU-ICT-H2020 weDRAW Project aiming at developing new multimodal technologies for multisensory serious-games on mathematical concepts for primary school children.

References

  1. 1998. The Rhythm of Mathematics. Classroom Compass - Eisenhowever Southwest Consortium for the Improvement of Mathematics and Science Teaching 4, 2 (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Camurri A., Mazzarino B., and Volpe G. 2004. Expressive Interfaces. Cognition Technology and Work 6, 1 (2004), 15-22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Camurri A., Mazzarino B., Ricchetti M., Timmers R., and Volpe G. 2004. Multimodal analysis of expressive gesture in music and dance performance. In Gesture-Based Communication in Human-Computer Interaction, Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Ed.). 20-39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Camurri A., Hashimoto S., Richetti M., Ricci A., Suzuki K., Trocca R., and Volpe G. 2000. EyesWeb: Toward Gesture and Affect Recognition in Interactive Dance and Music Systems. Computer Music Journal (2000), 57-69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Graziano A. B., Peterson M., and Shaw G. L. 1999. Enhanced learning of proportional math through music training and spatial-temporal training. Neurological research 21, 2 (1999), 139-152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dubus G. and Bresin R. 2013. A Systematic Review of Mapping Strategies for the Sonification of Physical Quantities. PLoS ONE 8, 12 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernald G. 1921. The effect of kinesthetic factors in development of word recognition in the case of non-readers. Journal of Educational Research 4 (1921).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Varni G. and Dubus G. et al. 2012. Interactive sonification of synchronisation of motor behaviour in social active listening to music with mobile devices. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 5 (2012), 157-173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Rauscher F. H., Shaw G. L., Levine L. J., Wright E. L., Dennis W. R., and Newcomb R. L. 1997. Music training causes long-term enhancement of preschool children’s spatial-temporal reasoning. Neurological Research 19 (1997), 2-8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Cheek J.M. and L.R. Smith. 1999. Music training and Mathematics achievement. Adolescence 34, 136 (1999), 759-761.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Barrett M. and Newell F. 2015. Task-Specific, Age Related Effects in the Cross-Modal Identification and Localisation of Objects. Multisensory research 28, 1-2 (2015), 111-151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Forgeard M., Gottfried S., Andrea N., Camilla R., Udita I., and Ellen W. 2008. The relation between music and phonological processing in normal-reading children and children with dyslexia. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal 25, 4 (2008), 383-390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Gori M., Del Viva M., Sandini G., and Burr D. C. 2008. Young children do not integrate visual and haptic form information. Current Biology 18, 9 (2008), 694-8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Habib M., Lardy C., Desiles T., Commeiras C., Chobert J., and Besson Mireille. 2016. Music and Dyslexia: A New Musical Training Method to Improve Reading and Related Disorders. Frontiers in Psychology 7, 26 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. MIE’17, November 13, 2017, Glasgow, UK S.Ghisio et al.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Piro J. M. and Ortiz C. 2009. The effect of piano lessons on the vocabulary and verbal sequencing skills of primary grade students. Psychology of Music 37, 3 (2009), 325-347.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Claudia S. Salcedo. 2010. The Effects Of Songs In The Foreign Language Classroom On Text Recall, Delayed Text Recall And Involuntary Mental Rehearsal. Journal of College Teaching and Learning 7, 6 (2010), 19-30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. A. Strauss and L. E. Lehtinen. 1947. Psychopathology and Education of the Brain-Injured Child. Grune and Stratton.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Orton S. T. 1928. Specific reading disability - strephosymbolia. Journal of American Medical Association 90 (1928), 1095-1099.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Abstract 1 Introduction 1.1 Background 2 Understanding Fractions Through the Body 2.1 Design and Architecture 2.2 Game Session 3 Conclusion and Future work Acknowledgments ReferencesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A multimodal serious-game to teach fractions in primary school

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader