Abstract
Activity recognition aims to provide accurate and opportune information on people’s activities by leveraging sensory data available in today’s sensory rich environments. Nowadays, activity recognition has become an emerging field in the areas of pervasive and ubiquitous computing. A typical activity recognition technique processes data streams that evolve from sensing platforms such as mobile sensors, on body sensors, and/or ambient sensors. This article surveys the two overlapped areas of research of activity recognition and data stream mining. The perspective of this article is to review the adaptation capabilities of activity recognition techniques in streaming environment. Categories of techniques are identified based on different features in both data streams and activity recognition. The pros and cons of the algorithms in each category are analysed, and the possible directions of future research are indicated.
- Zahraa Said Abdallah, Mohamed Medhat Gaber, Bala Srinivasan, and Shonali Krishnaswamy. 2012. StreamAR: Incremental and active learning with evolving sensory data for activity recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE 24th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI’12), vol. 1. 1163--1170. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zahraa Said Abdallah, Mohamed Medhat Gaber, Bala Srinivasan, and Shonali Krishnaswamy. 2015. Adaptive mobile activity recognition system with evolving data streams. Neurocomputing 150, Part A (2015), 304--317. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Charu C. Aggarwal. 2013. Outlier Analysis. Springer, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tahseen Al-Khateeb, Mohammad M. Masud, Latifur Khan, Charu C. Aggarwal, Jiawei Han, and Bhavani M. Thuraisingham. 2012. Stream classification with recurring and novel class detection using class-based ensemble. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’12). 31--40. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aziah Ali, Rachel C. King, and Guang-Zhong Yang. 2008. Semi-supervised segmentation for activity recognition with multiple eigenspaces. In Proceedings of the 5th International Summer School and Symposium on Medical Devices and Biosensors (ISSS-MDBS’08). IEEE, 314--317.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ira Assent, Philipp Kranen, Corinna Baldauf, and Thomas Seidl. 2012. AnyOut: Anytime outlier detection on streaming data. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA’12). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 228--242. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ling Bao and Stephen S. Intille. 2004. Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. In Pervasive Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3001. Springer, Berlin, 1--17.Google Scholar
- Albert Bifet and Ricard Gavaldà. 2007. Learning from time-changing data with adaptive windowing. In Proceedings of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. 443--448.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Avrim Blum and Tom Mitchell. 1998. Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory (COLT’98). ACM, New York, NY, 92--100. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gert Cauwenberghs and Tomaso Poggio. 2000. Incremental and decremental support vector machine learning. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’00). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 388--394. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id&equal;3008751.3008808. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rita Chattopadhyay, Qian Sun, Wei Fan, Ian Davidson, Sethuraman Panchanathan, and Jieping Ye. 2012. Multisource domain adaptation and its application to early detection of fatigue. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 6, 4 (2012), 1--18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yanping Chen, Bing Hu, Eamonn Keogh, and Gustavo E. A. P. A. Batista. 2013. DTW-D: Time series semi-supervised learning from a single example. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 383--391. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yanping Chen, Eamonn Keogh, Bing Hu, Nurjahan Begum, Anthony Bagnall, Abdullah Mueen, and Gustavo Batista. 2015. The UCR Time Series Classification Archive. Retrieved from www.cs.ucr.edu/ eamonn/time_series_data/.Google Scholar
- Diane Cook, Kyle D. Feuz, and Narayanan C. Krishnan. 2013. Transfer learning for activity recognition: A survey. Knowl. Info. Syst. 36, 3 (2013), 537--556. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thang M. Do, Seng W. Loke, and Fei Liu. 2013. HealthyLife: An activity recognition system with smartphone using logic-based stream reasoning. In Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking, and Services. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, Vol. 120. Springer, Berlin, 188--199.Google Scholar
- Pedro Domingos and Geoff Hulten. 2000. Mining high-speed data streams. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 71--80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anton Dries and Ulrich Rückert. 2009. Adaptive concept drift detection. Stat. Anal. Data Min. 2, 56 (2009), 311--327. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elaine R. Faria, João Gama, and André C. P. L. F. Carvalho. 2013. Novelty detection algorithm for data streams multi-class problems. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC’13). ACM, New York, NY, 795--800. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mohamed Medhat Gaber and Philip S. Yu. 2006. Detection and classification of changes in evolving data streams. Int. J. Info. Technol. Decis. Mak. 5, 4 (2006), 659--670.Google ScholarCross Ref
- João Gama. 2012. A survey on learning from data streams: Current and future trends. Progr. Artific. Intell. 1, 1 (2012), 45--55.Google ScholarCross Ref
- João Gama, Pedro Medas, Gladys Castillo, and Pedro Rodrigues. 2004. Learning with drift detection. In Proceedings of the Conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence (SBIA’04). Springer, 286--295.Google ScholarCross Ref
- João Gama, Pedro Pereira Rodrigues, Eduardo J. Spinosa, and André Carlos Ponce Leon Ferreira de Carvalho. 2010. Knowledge Discovery from Data Streams. Chapman 8 Hall/CRC Boca Raton. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alexander Gammerman, Volodya Vovk, and Vladimir Vapnik. 1998. Learning by transduction. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 148--155. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joao Bartolo Gomes, Shonali Krishnaswamy, Mohamed Medhat Gaber, Pedro A. C. Sousa, and Ernestina Menasalvas. 2012a. MARS: A personalised mobile activity recognition system. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 13th International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM’12). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 316--319. Google ScholarDigital Library
- João Bártolo Gomes, Shonali Krishnaswamy, Mohamed M. Gaber, Pedro A. C. Sousa, and Ernestina Menasalvas. 2012b. Mobile activity recognition using ubiquitous data stream mining. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 130--141. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Donghai Guan, Weiwei Yuan, Young-Koo Lee, A. Gavrilov, and Sungyoung Lee. 2007. Activity recognition based on semi-supervised learning. In Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications (RTCSA’07). 469--475. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hirotaka Hachiya, Masashi Sugiyama, and Naonori Ueda. 2012. Importance-weighted least-squares probabilistic classifier for covariate shift adaptation with application to human activity recognition. Neurocomputing 80 (2012), 93--101.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maayan Harel and Shie Mannor. 2010. Learning from multiple outlooks. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning. 401--408. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Douglas M. Hawkins. 1980. Identification of Outliers. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
- Morteza Zi Hayat and Mahmoud Reza Hashemi. 2010. A DCT based approach for detecting novelty and concept drift in data streams. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition (SoCPaR’10). 373--378.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bing Hu, Yanping Chen, and Eamonn Keogh. 2013. Time series classification under more realistic assumptions. In Proceedings of the 2013 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. SIAM, 578--586.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shucheng Huang and Yisheng Dong. 2007. An active learning system for mining time-changing data streams. Intell. Data Anal. 11, 4 (2007), 401--419. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Geoff Hulten, Laurie Spencer, and Pedro Domingos. 2001. Mining time-changing data streams. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’01). ACM, New York, NY, 97--106. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tâm Huynh and Bernt Schiele. 2006. Towards less supervision in activity recognition from wearable sensors. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers. IEEE, 3--10.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ashish Kapoor and Eric Horvitz. 2008. Experience sampling for building predictive user models: A comparative study. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’08). ACM, New York, NY, 657--666. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dean M. Karantonis, Michael R. Narayanan, Merryn Mathie, Nigel H. Lovell, and Branko G. Celler. 2006. Implementation of a real-time human movement classifier using a triaxial accelerometer for ambulatory monitoring. IEEE Trans. Info. Technol. Biomed. 10, 1 (2006), 156--167. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Kifer, Shai Ben-David, and Johannes Gehrke. 2004. Detecting change in data streams. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. VLDB Endowment, 180--191. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ralf Klinkenberg and Thorsten Joachims. 2000. Detecting concept drift with support vector machines. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’00). 487--494. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ralf Klinkenberg and Ingrid Renz. 1998. Adaptive information filtering: Learning drifting concepts. In Proceedings of the Workshop Learning for Text Categorization and International Conference on Machine Learning (AAAI’98/ICML’98). Press, 33--40.Google Scholar
- Narayanan C. Krishnan and Diane J. Cook. 2014. Activity recognition on streaming sensor data. Pervas. Mobile Comput. 10 (2014), 138--154. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jennifer R. Kwapisz, Gary M. Weiss, and Samuel A. Moore. 2011. Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers. ACM SigKDD Explor. Newslett. 12, 2 (2011), 74--82. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Powell Lawton and Elaine M. Brody. 1969. Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9, 3 (1969), 179--186.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Min-Seok Lee, Jong-Gwan Lim, Ki-Ru Park, and Dong-Soo Kwon. 2009. Unsupervised clustering for abnormality detection based on the tri-axial accelerometer. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Control, Automation and Systems and Society of Instrument and Control Engineers (ICCAS-SICE’09). 134--137.Google Scholar
- Seon-Woo Lee and Kenji Mase. 2002. Activity and location recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Pervas. Comput. 1, 3 (2002), 24--32. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Young-Seol Lee and Sung-Bae Cho. 2014. Activity recognition with android phone using mixture-of-experts co-trained with labeled and unlabeled data. Neurocomputing 126 (2014), 106--115. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonathan Lester, Tanzeem Choudhury, Nicky Kern, Gaetano Borriello, and Blake Hannaford. 2005. A hybrid discriminative/generative approach for modeling human activities. In Proceedings of the 19th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’05). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 766--772. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id&equal;1642293.1642416 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fei Li and Schahram Dustdar. 2011. Incorporating unsupervised learning in activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 4th AAAI Conference on Activity Context Representation: Techniques and Languages (AAAIWS’11). AAAI Press, 38--41. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id&equal;2908613.2908620. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fangtao Li, Sinno Jialin Pan, Ou Jin, Qiang Yang, and Xiaoyan Zhu. 2012. Cross-domain co-extraction of sentiment and topic lexicons. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 410--419. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Li-Jia Li, Gang Wang, and Li Fei-Fei. 2007. OPTIMOL: Automatic online picture collecTion via incremental model learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 1--8.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peipei Li, Xindong Wu, and Xuegang Hu. 2012. Mining recurring concept drifts with limited labeled streaming data. ACM Trans. Intel. Syst. Technol. 3, 2 (2012), 1--29. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Patrick Lindstrom, Brian Mac Namee, and Sarah Jane Delany. 2013. Drift detection using uncertainty distribution divergence. Evolv. Syst. 4, 1 (2013), 13--25.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Li Liu, Yuxin Peng, Ming Liu, and Zigang Huang. 2015. Sensor-based human activity recognition system with a multilayered model using time series shapelets. Knowl.-Based Syst. 90 (2015), 138--152. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jeffrey W. Lockhart, Tony Pulickal, and Gary M. Weiss. 2012. Applications of mobile activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’12). ACM, New York, NY, 1054--1058. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jeffrey W. Lockhart and Gary M. Weiss. 2014. The benefits of personalized smartphone-based activity recognition models. In Proceedings of the 2014 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. 614--622.Google Scholar
- Beth Logan, Jennifer Healey, Matthai Philipose, Emmanuel Munguia Tapia, and Stephen Intille. 2007. A long-term evaluation of sensing modalities for activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’07). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 483--500. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id&equal;1771592.1771620. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mingsheng Long, Jianmin Wang, Guiguang Ding, Jiaguang Sun, and Philip S. Yu. 2013. Transfer feature learning with joint distribution adaptation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2200--2207. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brent Longstaff, Sasank Reddy, and Deborah Estrin. 2010. Improving activity classification for health applications on mobile devices using active and semi-supervised learning. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth’10). IEEE, 1--7.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mohammad M. Masud, Tahseen M. Al-Khateeb, Latifur Khan, Charu Aggarwal, Jing Gao, Jiawei Han, and Bhavani Thuraisingham. 2011. Detecting recurring and novel classes in concept-drifting data streams. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’11). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 1176--1181. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mohammad M. Masud, Qing Chen, Latifur Khan, Charu C. Aggarwal, Jing Gao, Jiawei Han, Ashok Srivastava, and Nikunj C. Oza. 2013. Classification and adaptive novel class detection of feature-evolving data streams. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 25, 7 (2013), 1484--1497. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mohammad M. Masud, Jing Gao, L. Khan, Jiawei Han, and Bhavani Thuraisingham. 2011. Classification and novel class detection in concept-drifting data streams under time constraints. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 23, 6 (2011), 859--874. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mohammad M. Masud, Clay Woolam, Jing Gao, Latifur Khan, Jiawei Han, Kevin W. Hamlen, and Nikunj C. Oza. 2012. Facing the reality of data stream classification: Coping with scarcity of labeled data. Knowl. Info. Syst. 33, 1 (2012), 213--244. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Uwe Maurer, Asim Smailagic, Daniel P. Siewiorek, and Michael Deisher. 2006. Activity recognition and monitoring using multiple sensors on different body positions. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN’06). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 113--116. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Emiliano Miluzzo, Nicholas D. Lane, Kristóf Fodor, Ronald Peterson, Hong Lu, Mirco Musolesi, Shane B. Eisenman, Xiao Zheng, and Andrew T. Campbell. 2008. Sensing meets mobile social networks: The design, implementation and evaluation of the cenceme application. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems (SenSys’08). ACM, New York, NY, 337--350. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Min Mun, Sasank Reddy, Katie Shilton, Nathan Yau, Jeff Burke, Deborah Estrin, Mark Hansen, Eric Howard, Ruth West, and Péter Boda. 2009. PEIR, the personal environmental impact report, as a platform for participatory sensing systems research. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys’09). ACM, New York, NY, 55--68. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ion Muslea, Steven Minton, and Craig A. Knoblock. 2000. Selective sampling with redundant views. In Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 12th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 621--626. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id&equal;647288.721119. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Le T. Nguyen, Ming Zeng, Patrick Tague, and Joy Zhang. 2015. Recognizing new activities with limited training data. In Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 67--74. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wei Niu, Jiao Long, Dan Han, and Yuan-Fang Wang. 2004. Human activity detection and recognition for video surveillance. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME’04), vol. 1. 719--722.Google Scholar
- Sinno Jialin Pan, Ivor W. Tsang, James T. Kwok, and Qiang Yang. 2011. Domain adaptation via transfer component analysis. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 22, 2 (2011), 199--210. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sinno Jialin Pan and Qiang Yang. 2010. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 22, 10 (2010), 1345--1359. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Juha Pärkkä, Luc Cluitmans, and Miikka Ermes. 2010. Personalization algorithm for real-time activity recognition using PDA, wireless motion bands, and binary decision tree. IEEE Trans. Info. Technol. Biomed. 14, 5 (2010), 1211--1215. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Donald J. Patterson, Dieter Fox, Henry Kautz, and Matthai Philipose. 2005. Fine-grained activity recognition by aggregating abstract object usage. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC’05). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 44--51. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Perera, A. Zaslavsky, P. Christen, and D. Georgakopoulos. 2014. Context aware computing for the internet of things: A survey. IEEE Commun. Surveys Tutor. 16, 1 (2014), 414--454.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tom Peterek, Marek Penhaker, Petr Gajdo, and Pavel Dohnlek. 2014. Comparison of classification algorithms for physical activity recognition. In Innovations in Bio-inspired Computing and Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 237. Springer International Publishing, 123--131.Google Scholar
- Parisa Rashidi and Diane J. Cook. 2010. Mining sensor streams for discovering human activity patterns over time. In Proceedings of the IEEE 10th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’10). 431--440. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Parisa Rashidi, Diane J. Cook, Lawrence B. Holder, and Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe. 2011. Discovering activities to recognize and track in a smart environment. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 23, 4 (2011), 527--539. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nishkam Ravi, Nikhil Dandekar, Preetham Mysore, and Michael L. Littman. 2005. Activity recognition from accelerometer data. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI’05). AAAI Press, 1541--1546. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id&equal;1620092.1620107. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Attila Reiss and Didier Stricker. 2013. Personalized mobile physical activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC’13). ACM, New York, NY, 25--28. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Roggen, Alberto Calatroni, Mirco Rossi, Thomas Holleczek, Kilian Forster, Gerhard Troster, Paul Lukowicz, David Bannach, Gerald Pirkl, Alois Ferscha, J. Doppler, C. Holzmann, M. Kurz, G. Holl, R. Chavarriaga, H. Sagha, H. Bayati, M. Creatura, and J. del R. Millan. 2010. Collecting complex activity datasets in highly rich networked sensor environments. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems (INSS’10). 233--240.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeffrey C. Schlimmer and Richard H. Granger Jr. 1986. Incremental learning from noisy data. Mach. Learn. 1, 3 (1986), 317--354. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Skyler Seto, Wenyu Zhang, and Yichen Zhou. 2015. Multivariate time series classification using dynamic time warping template selection for human activity recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence. IEEE, 1399--1406.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Xiaoxiao Shi, Qi Liu, Wei Fan, S. Yu Philip, and Ruixin Zhu. 2010. Transfer learning on heterogenous feature spaces via spectral transformation. In Proceedings of the IEEE 10th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’10). IEEE, 1049--1054. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eduardo J. Spinosa, André C. P. L. F. Carvalho, and João Gama. 2007. OLINDDA: A cluster-based approach for detecting novelty and concept drift in data streams. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC’07). ACM, New York, NY, 448--452. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maja Stikic, Diane Larlus, Sandra Ebert, and Bernt Schiele. 2011. Weakly supervised recognition of daily life activities with wearable sensors. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 33, 12 (2011), 2521--2537. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maja Stikic, Diane Larlus, and Bernt Schiele. 2009. Multi-graph based semi-supervised learning for activity recognition. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC’09). IEEE, 85--92. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maja Stikic, Kristof Van Laerhoven, and Bernt Schiele. 2008. Exploring semi-supervised and active learning for activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC’08). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 81--88. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Nick Street and YongSeog Kim. 2001. A streaming ensemble algorithm (SEA) for large-scale classification. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 377--382. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul A. Viola and Michael J. Jones. 2001. Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’01). 511--518.Google Scholar
- Quang Viet Vo, Minh Thang Hoang, and Deokjai Choi. 2013. Personalization in mobile activity recognition system using-medoids clustering algorithm. Int. J. Distrib. Sensor Netw. 9, 1 (2013), 12.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Amal A. Wanigatunga, Paul V. Nickerson, Todd M. Manini, and Parisa Rashidi. 2016. Using symbolic aggregate approximation (SAX) to visualize activity transitions among older adults. Physiol. Measure. 37, 11 (2016), 1981.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jamie A. Ward, Paul Lukowicz, Gerhard Troster, and Thad E. Starner. 2006. Activity recognition of assembly tasks using body-worn microphones and accelerometers. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 28, 10 (2006), 1553--1567. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gary M. Weiss and Jeffrey W. Lockhart. 2012. The impact of personalization on smartphone-based activity recognition. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Activity Context Representation: Techniques and Languages.Google Scholar
- Gary M. Weiss, Jeffrey W. Lockhart, Tony T. Pulickal, Paul T. McHugh, Isaac H. Ronan, and Jessica L. Timko. August 2014. Actitracker: A smartphone-based activity recognition system for improving health and well-being. In SIGKDD Exploration Newsletter. New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Karl Weiss, Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar, and DingDing Wang. 2016. A survey of transfer learning. J. Big Data 3, 1 (2016), 1--40.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gerhard Widmer and Miroslav Kubat. 1996. Learning in the presence of concept drift and hidden contexts. Mach. Learn. 23, 1 (1996), 69--101. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert B. Woodruff and Sarah Gardial. 1996. Know Your Customer: New Approaches to Customer Value and Satisfaction. Blackwell Business Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Danny Wyatt, Matthai Philipose, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2005. Unsupervised activity recognition using automatically mined common sense. In Proceedings of the 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’05). AAAI Press, 21--27. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id&equal;1619332.1619338. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jun Yang, Hong Lu, Zhigang Liu, and Péter Pál Boda. 2010. Physical activity recognition with mobile phones: Challenges, methods, and applications. In Multimedia Interaction and Intelligent User Interfaces. Springer, 185--213.Google Scholar
- Yiming Yang, Jian Zhang, Jaime Carbonell, and Chun Jin. 2002. Topic-conditioned novelty detection. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD’02). ACM, New York, NY, 688--693. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yi Yao and Gianfranco Doretto. 2010. Boosting for transfer learning with multiple sources. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’10). IEEE, 1855--1862.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David Yarowsky. 1995. Unsupervised word sense disambiguation rivaling supervised methods. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’95). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, 189--196. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Juan Ye, Graeme Stevenson, and Simon Dobson. 2014. USMART: An unsupervised semantic mining activity recognition technique. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 4, 4, Article 16 (Nov. 2014). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dit-Yan Yeung and C. Chow. 2002. Parzen-window network intrusion detectors. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 4. 385--388. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bingchuan Yuan and John Herbert. 2014. Smartphone-based activity recognition using hybrid classifier. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Pervasive and Embedded Computing and Communication Systems.Google Scholar
- Daqing Zhang, Mossaab Hariz, and Mounir Mokhtari. 2008. Assisting elders with mild dementia staying at home. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PERCOM’08). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, 692--697. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhongtang Zhao, Yiqiang Chen, Junfa Liu, and Mingjie Liu. 2010. Cross-mobile elm based activity recognition. Int. J. Eng. Industr. 1, 1 (2010), 30--38.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhongtang Zhao, Yiqiang Chen, Junfa Liu, Zhiqi Shen, and Mingjie Liu. 2011. Cross-people mobile-phone based activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’11), vol. 3. AAAI Press, 2545--2550. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vincent Wenchen Zheng, Sinno Jialin Pan, Qiang Yang, and Jeffrey Junfeng Pan. 2008. Transferring multi-device localization models using latent multi-task learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’08), vol. 8. 1427--1432. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yonglei Zheng, Weng-Keen Wong, Xinze Guan, and Stewart Trost. 2013. Physical activity recognition from accelerometer data using a multi-scale ensemble method. In Proceedings of the 27th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’13). AAAI Press, 1575--1581. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id&equal;2891460.2891682. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yin Zhu, Yuqiang Chen, Zhongqi Lu, Sinno Jialin Pan, Gui-Rong Xue, Yong Yu, and Qiang Yang. 2011. Heterogeneous transfer learning for image classification. In Proceedings of the 25th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’11). AAAI Press, 1304--1309. Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. Zliobaite, A. Bifet, B. Pfahringer, and G. Holmes. 2014. Active learning with drifting streaming data. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 25, 1 (2014), 27--39.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Indrė Žliobaitė, Mykola Pechenizkiy, and João Gama. 2016. An overview of concept drift applications. In Big Data Analysis: New Algorithms for a New Society. Springer, 91--114.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Activity Recognition with Evolving Data Streams: A Review
Recommendations
Adaptive mobile activity recognition system with evolving data streams
Mobile activity recognition focuses on inferring current user activities by leveraging sensory data available on today's sensor rich mobile phones. Supervised learning with static models has been applied pervasively for mobile activity recognition. In ...
Activity Recognition in New Smart Home Environments
HealthMedia'18: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Multimedia for Personal Health and Health CareActivity recognition is important to health care in smart homes. It provides information about the activities of the residents. Many health care services are based on it. To collect data about the activities, sensor networks consist of binary sensors ...
Annotating smart environment sensor data for activity learning
Smart Environments: Technology to Support HealthcareThe pervasive sensing technologies found in smart homes offer unprecedented opportunities for providing health monitoring and assistance to individuals experiencing difficulties living independently at home. In order to monitor the functional health of ...
Comments