skip to main content
10.1145/3160504.3160544acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Here's What I Can Do: Chatbots' Strategies to Convey Their Features to Users

Published:23 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Chatbots have been around since the 1960's, but recently they have risen in popularity especially due to new compatibility with social networks and messenger applications. Chatbots are different from traditional user interfaces, for they unveil themselves to the user one sentence at a time. Because of that, users may struggle to interact with them and to understand what they can do. Hence, it is important to support designers in deciding how to convey chatbots' features to users, as this might determine whether the user continues to chat or not. As a first step in this direction, in this paper our goal is to analyze the communicative strategies that have been used by popular chatbots to convey their features to users. To perform this analysis we use the Semiotic Inspection Method (SIM). As a result we identify and discuss the different strategies used by the analyzed chatbots to present their features to users. We also discuss the challenges and limitations of using SIM on such interfaces.

References

  1. Luis F. H. Bento, Raquel O. Prates, and Luiz Chaimowicz. 2009. Using Semiotic Inspection Method to Evaluate a Human-Robot Interface. In 2009 Latin American Web Congress. IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 77--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Daniel G. Bobrow. 1964. Natural Language Input for a Computer Problem Solving System. Technical Report. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Heloisa Candello and Claudio Pinhanez. 2016. Designing Conversational Interfaces. In Simpósio Brasileiro sobre Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais - IHC 2016 (15 ed.). Vol. Parte C - Livro dos Tutoriais. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação - SBC, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Heloisa Candello, Claudio Pinhanez, and Flavio Figueiredo. 2017. Typefaces and the Perception of Humanness in Natural Language Chatbots. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3476--3487. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Luiz P. D. Corrêa, Flávio R. S. Coutinho, Raquel O. Prates, and Luiz Chaimowicz. 2012. Uso Do MIS Para Avaliar Signos Sonoros: Quando Um Problema De Comunicabilidade Se Torna Um Problema De Acessibilidade. In Proceedings of the 11th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC '12). Brazilian Computer Society, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 47--56. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2393536.2393543 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Soraia de S. Reis and Raquel O. Prates. 2011. Applicability of the Semiotic Inspection Method: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 10th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems and the 5th Latin American Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (IHC+CLIHC '11). Brazilian Computer Society, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 177--186. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2254436.2254468 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Clarisse S. de Souza. 2005. The Semiotic Engineering of Human-computer Interaction. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarisse S. de Souza, Carla F. Leitão, Raquel O. Prates, and Elton J. da Silva. 2006. The Semiotic Inspection Method. In Proceedings of VII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 148--157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Clarisse S. de Souza and Carla F. Leitão. 2009. Semiotic Engineering Methods for Scientific Research in HCI. Morgan & Claypool, San Rafael, CA, USA. 1--122 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Clarisse S. de Souza, Carla F. Leitão, Raquel O. Prates, Sílvia A. Bim, and Elton J. da Silva. 2010. Can inspection methods generate valid new knowledge in HCI? The case of semiotic inspection. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 1-2 (Jan. 2010), 22--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jiepu Jiang, Ahmed H. Awadallah, Rosie Jones, Umut Ozertem, Imed Zitouni, Ranjitha G. Kulkarni, and Omar Z. Khan. 2015. Automatic Online Evaluation of Intelligent Assistants. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 506--516. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Michael McTear, Zoraida Callejas, and David Griol. 2016. Evaluating the Conversational Interface. In The Conversational Interface. Springer International Publishing, 379--402.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Nicole M. Radziwill and Morgan C. Benton. 2017. Evaluating Quality of Chatbots and Intelligent Conversational Agents. arXiv:1704.04579 {cs} (April 2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.04579Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Francisco A. M. Valério, Tatiane G. Guimarães, and Raquel O. Prates. 2016. Strategies for Encouraging Sharing in Social Networks for Professionals. In Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computer Systems (IHC '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 54:1--54:4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Marilyn A. Walker, Diane J. Litman, Candace A. Kamm, and Alicia Abella. 1997. PARADISE: A Framework for Evaluating Spoken Dialogue Agents. In Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL '97). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 271--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Joseph Weizenbaum. 1966. ELIZA --- A Computer Program for the Study of Natural Language Communication Between Man and Machine. Commun. ACM 9, 1 (Jan. 1966), 36--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Here's What I Can Do: Chatbots' Strategies to Convey Their Features to Users

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IHC '17: Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      October 2017
      622 pages
      ISBN:9781450363778
      DOI:10.1145/3160504

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 October 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      IHC '17 Paper Acceptance Rate66of184submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader