skip to main content
10.1145/3209281.3209306acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Interoperability governance: a definition and insights from case studies in Europe

Published:30 May 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Interoperability has become a crucial value in European e-government developments, as promoted by the Digital Single Market strategy and the Tallinn Declaration. The European Union and its Member States have made considerable investments in improving the understanding of interoperability and in developing interoperable building blocks to support cross-border data exchange and public service provisioning. This includes recent updates of the European Interoperability Framework (EIF) and European Interoperability Reference Architecture (EIRA), as well as the publication of a number of generic and domain specific architecture and solutions building blocks such as digital identification or electronic delivery services. While in the previous version of the EIF, interoperability governance was not clearly developed, the new version of 2017 puts interoperability governance as a concept that spans across the different interoperability layers (legal, organizational, semantic and technical) and that builds the frame for interoperability overall. In this paper, we develop a definition of interoperability governance from a literature review and we put forward a model to investigate interoperability governance models at European and Member State levels. Based on several case studies of EU institutions and Member States, we could draw recommendations for what the key aspects of interoperability governance are to successfully diffuse interoperability into public service provisioning.

References

  1. L. Guijarro, "Interoperability frameworks and enterprise architectures in e-government initiatives in Europe and the United States," Government Information Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 89--101, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. K. Bovalis, V. Peristeras, M. Abecasis and et al, "Promoting Interoperability in Europe's E-Government," Computer, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 25--33, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Lisboa and D. Soares, "E-Government interoperability frameworks: a worldwide inventory," Procedia Technology, vol. 16, pp. 638--648, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. European Commission, "Annex 2 to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 'European Interoperability Framework - implementation strategy'," Brussels, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. ISA-Unit, European Commission, "An Introduction to the European Interoperability Reference Architecture v0.9.0 (EIRA)," 2015. {Online}. Available: https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/eia/asset_release/eira-release-v090-beta.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Saekow and C. Boonmee, "Pragmatic Approach to Interoperability Practical Implementation Support (IPIS) for e-Government Interoperability," Electronic Journal of e-Government, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 403--414, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. European Commission, "Annex 2 to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions 'Towards interoperability for European public services'," Brussels, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Kooper, R. Maes and E. R. Lindgreen, "On the governance of information: Introducing a new concept of governance to," International Journal of Information Management, vol. 31, pp. 195--200, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. OECD, "OECD principles of corporate governance," Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, New York, NY, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. P. Weill and J. W. Ross, IT governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. IT Governance Institute, "Boarding Briefing on IT Governance," 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Wimmer, "Integrated service modeling for online one-stop Government," Electronic Markets, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1--8, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. K. Hjort-Madsen and J. Gøtze, "Enterprise Architecture in Government - Towards a Multi-level Framework for Managing IT in Government," Dublin Castle, Ireland, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. K. Hjort-Madsen, "Enterprise Architecture Implementation and Management: A Case Study on Interoperability," (HICSS), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Janssen and K. Hjort-Madsen, "Analyzing Enterprise Architecture in National Governments: The Cases of Denmark and the Netherlands," HICSS, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Lankhorst, Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis, 2nd Edition ed., Heidelberg: Springer, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. The Open Group, TOGAF. The Open Group Architecture Framework. Version 9, Van Harem Publishing, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. V. Khatri and C. V. Brown, "Designing data governance," Communications of the ACM, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 148--153, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. D. Loorbach, "Governance and Transitions. An multi-level policy-framework based on complex systems thinking," in Berlin Conference on Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Berlin, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. R. Kemp, D. Loorbach and J. Rotmans, "Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development," International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, vol. 14, pp. 1--15, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. P. Baxter and S. Jack, "Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers," The Qualitative Report, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 544--559, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. R. K. Yin, Case study research: design and methods. 5th edition, Los Angeles et al: Sage Publications, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. K. Rabl, Strukturierung strategischer Planungsprozesse, Wiesbaden: Gabler, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. A. Saekow and C. Boonmee, "Pragmatic Approach to Interoperability Practical Implementation Support (IPIS) for e-Government Interoperability)," Electronic Journal of e-Government, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 403--414, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Interoperability governance: a definition and insights from case studies in Europe

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      dg.o '18: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age
      May 2018
      889 pages
      ISBN:9781450365260
      DOI:10.1145/3209281

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 May 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate150of271submissions,55%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader