skip to main content
research-article

Digital Information Asset Evaluation: A Case Study in Manufacturing

Published:25 July 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The article discusses a model for information value assessment based on the concepts of information capacity, information utility, and information management costs. Notwithstanding that both state-of-the-art researchers and practitioners consider information as a fundamental asset, there is actually no consensus on what are the determinants of information value, particularly with regard to the increasing number of data available through digitalized processes and services. The model is applied to a case study comparing two information management projects for the improvement of core business processes of a global manufacturing company based in Italy.

References

  1. Ahituv, N. (1980). A systematic approach towards assessing the value of an information system. MIS Quarterly, 4(4), 61--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ahituv, N. (1989). Assessing the value of information: Problems and approaches. In J. I. DeGross, J. C. Henderson, & B. R. Konsynski (Eds.), International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 1989) (pp. 315--325). Boston, Massachusetts. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Batini, C., Cappiello, C., Francalanci, C., Maurino, A., & Viscusi, G. (2011). A capacity and value based model for data architectures adopting integration technologies. In Proceedings of the 17th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2011), Detroit, Michigan, August 4--7, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Batini, C., Ceri, S., & Navathe, S. B. (1991). Conceptual database design: An entity-relationship approach. Redwood City, CA, USA: Benjamin-Cummings Publishing Co., Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Batini, C., & Scannapieco, M. (2006). Data quality: Concepts, methodologies and techniques. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Batini, C., & Scannapieco, M. (2016). Data and information quality: Dimensions, principles and techniques. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bauer, C., Korunovska, J., & Spiekermann, S. (2012). On the value of information--What Facebook users are willing to pay. In Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2012), Barcelona, Spain, June 11--13, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O., Pavlou, P., & Venkatraman, N. (2013a). Digital business strategy: Toward a extgeneration of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471--482. Retrieved from http://www.misq.org/misq/downloads/download/editorial/581/ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O., Pavlou, P., & Venkatraman, N. (2013b). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471--482. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Boisot, M. (1995). Information space: A framework for learning in organizations, institutions, and culture. London; New York: Routledge. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Boisot, M. (1998). Knowledge assets: Securing competitive advantage in the information economy. New York: Oxford University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Boisot, M., MacMillan, I. C., & Han, K. S. (2007). Explorations in information space knowledge, actors, and firms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The productivity paradox of information technology: Review and assessment. Communications of the ACM, 36(12), 67--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2011). Race against the machine: How the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy. Digital Frontier Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Carr, N. G. (2003). IT doesn't matter. Harvard Business Review, June(1), 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. da Cruz, M. A. L., & dos Santos, H. M. D. (2016). The information value: Perception of the problem. In Á. Rocha, A. M. Correia, H. Adeli, L. P. Reis, & M. Mendonça Teixeira (Eds.), New Advances in Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 503--509). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Dedrick, J., Gurbaxani, V., & Kraemer, K. L. (2003). Information technology and economic performance?: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Computing Surveys, 35(1), 1--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Francalanci, C., & Morabito, V. (2008). IS integration and business performance: The mediation effect of organizational absorptive capacity in SMEs. Journal of Information Technology, 23, 297--312. Retrieved fromGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Gilboa, I., & Lehrer, E. (1991). The value of information -- An axiomatic approach. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 443--459.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Glazer, R. (1993). Measuring the value of information: The information-intensive organization. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 99--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kallinikos, J. (2006). The consequences of information - Institutional implications of technological change. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kettinger, W. J., Grover, V., Guha, S., & Segars, A. H. (1994). Strategic information-systems revisited - A study in sustainability and performance. MISQ Quarterly, 18(1), 31--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Kohli, R., & Grover, V. (2008). Business value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(1), 23--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Lee, Y. W., Pipino, L. L., Funk, J. D., & Wang, R. Y. (2009). Journey to data quality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Markus, M. L., Tanis, C., & van Fenema, P. C. (2000). Enterprise resource planning: Multisite ERP implementations. Communications of the ACM, 43(4), 42--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MISQ, 28(2), 283--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Moody, D., & Walsh, P. (1999). Measuring the value of Information: An asset valuation approach. In Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS1999), Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark, June 23--25, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Quetti, C., Pigni, F., & Clerici, A. (2012). Factors affecting RFId adoption in a vertical supply chain: The case of the silk industry in Italy. Production Planning & Control: The Management of Operations, 23(4), 315--331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Raban, D. R., & Mazor, M. (2013). The willingness to pay for information in digital marketplaces. In A. Kobyli'ski & A. Sobczak (Eds.), Perspectives in business informatics research, 12th International Conference, BIR 2013, Warsaw, Poland, September 23--25, 2013. Proceedings (pp. 267--277). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Remenyi, D., Money, A., Sherwood-Smith, M., & Zahir, I. (2000). The effective measurement and management of IT costs and benefits (2nd ed.). Butterworth Heinemann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Sajko, M., Rabuzin, K., Bača, M. (2006). How to calculate information value for effective security risk assessment. Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences, 30(2), 263--278.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Simpson, C. W., & Prusak, L. (1995). Troubles with information overload-Moving from quantity to quality in information provision. International Journal of Information Management, 15(6), 413--425. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Skyrme, D. (1994). Ten ways to add value to your business. Managing Information, 1(3), 20--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Spiekermann, S., & Korunovska, J. (2017). Towards a value theory for personal data. Journal of Information Technology, 32(1), 62--84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Stewart, T. A., Brown, J. S., Hagel, J., McFarlan, F. W., Nolan, R. L., Strassmann, P. A., & Carr, N. G. (2003). Does IT Matter? An HBR Debate, Letters to the Editor, Harvard Business Review, June 2003, 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Tallon, B. P. P., & Scannell, R. (2007). Information life cycle. Communications of the ACM, 50(11), 65--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. The Economist. (2010). Data, data everywhere. Special Report: Managing Information.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Viscusi, G., & Batini, C. (2014). Digital Information Asset Evaluation: Characteristics and Dimensions. In L. Caporarello, B. Di Martino, & M. Martinez (Eds.), Smart Organizations and Smart Artifacts SE - 9 (Vol. 7, pp. 77--86). Springer International Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Yoo, Y. (2013). The tables have turned: How can the information systems field contribute to technology and innovation management research? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(5), 227--236.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research commentary-The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724--735. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Digital Information Asset Evaluation: A Case Study in Manufacturing

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems
          ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems  Volume 49, Issue 3
          August 2018
          115 pages
          ISSN:0095-0033
          EISSN:1532-0936
          DOI:10.1145/3242734
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2018 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 25 July 2018

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader