skip to main content
10.1145/3292147.3292161acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Use of voice activated interfaces by people with intellectual disability

Published:04 December 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

People with intellectual disability are keen users of information technology, but the need for spelling and typing skills often presents a barrier to information and media search and access. The paper presents a study to understand how people with intellectual disabilities can use Voice Activated Interfaces (VAIs) to access information and assist in daily activities. The study involves observations and video analysis of 18 adults with intellectual disability using VAIs and performing 4 tasks: calibrating the VAIs, using voice assistant (Siri or Google) to search images, using voice to query Youtube, and using the voice assistant to perform a daily task (managing calendar, finding directions, etc.). 72% of participants stated that this was their preferred form of input. 50% could perform all four tasks they attempted with successful outcomes, and 55% three of the tasks. We identify the main barriers and opportunities for existing VAIs and suggest future improvements mainly around audio feedback given to participants. Notably, we found that participants' mental model of the VAIs was that of a person, implications for which include the user having to speak in long polite sentences and expecting voice responses and feedback about the state of the device. We suggest ways that VAIs can be adjusted so that they are more inclusive.

References

  1. Kevin M. Ayres, Linda Mechling, and Frank J Sansosti, F. 2013. The use of mobile technologies to assist with life skills/independence of students with moderate/severe intellectual disability and/or autism spectrum disorders: considerations for the future of school psychology. Psychology In The Schools 50, 3, 259--271.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Andrew A. Bayor, Filip Bircanin, Laurianne Sitbon, Bernd Ploderer and Margot Brereton. 2018. Characterizing Participation across Social Media Sites amongst Young Adults with Intellectual Disability, To appear Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research In Psychology 3, 2, 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Margot Brereton, Laurianne Sitbon, Muhammad Abdullah, Mark Vanderberg and Stewart Koplick. 2015. Design after design to bridge between people living with cognitive or sensory impairments, their friends and proxies. Codesign 11, 1(Jan 2015), 4--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Darren Chadwick, Caroline Wesson and Chris Fullwood. 2013. Internet Access by People with Intellectual Disabilities: Inequalities and Opportunities. Future Internet 5, 3, 376--397.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. David Cihak, Rachel Wright, Cate Smith, Don McMahon and Kelly Kraiss. 2016. Incorporating functional digital literacy skills as part of the curriculum for high school students with intellectual disability. Education And Training In Autism And Developmental Disabilities 50, 2, 155--171.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. James Collins and Lana Collet-Klingenberg. 2017. Portable electronic assistive technology to improve vocational task completion in young adults with an intellectual disability. Journal Of Intellectual Disabilities 22, 3, 213--231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. MC Coppens-Hofman, H Terband, A.F.M Snik and B.A.M Maassen. 2016. Speech Characteristics and Intelligibility in Adults with Mild and Moderate Intellectual Disabilities. Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopaedica 68, 4, 175--182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Definition. Aaidd.org. Retrieved 6 March 2018, from http://aaidd.org/intellectual-disability/definitionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jinjuan Feng, Jonathan Lazar, Libby Kumin and Ant Ozok. 2008. Computer Usage by Young Individuals with Down Syndrome: An Exploratory Study. In Assets 08, 35--42. Halifax, Nova Scotia: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Bjorn Harrysson, A. Svensk and G. Johansson. 2004. How people with developmental disabilities navigate the Internet. British Journal Of Special Education 31, 3, 138--142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Brigitte Jordan and Austin Henderson. 1995. Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice. Journal Of The Learning Sciences 4, 1, 39--103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Soonil Kwon, Sung-Jae Kim and Joon Yeon Choeh. 2016. Preprocessing for elderly speech recognition of smart devices. Computer Speech & Language 36, 110--121. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Libby Kumin, Jonathan Lazar and Jinjuan Feng. 2012. Expanding Job Options: Potential Computer-Related Employment for Adults with Down Syndrome. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility And Computing 103, 14--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Youngsun Lee, Michael L. Wehmeyer, Susan B. Palmer, Kendra Williams-Diehm, Daniel Davies and Steven E. Stock. 2010. The Effect of Student-Directed Transition Planning With a Computer-Based Reading Support Program on the Self-Determination of Students With Disabilities. The Journal Of Special Education 45, 2, 104--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Dixie McCollum, Steven Nation and Sharon Gunn. 2014. The Effects of a Speech-to-Text Software Application on Written Expression for Students with Various Disabilities. National Forum Of Special Education Journal 25, 1, 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Asaf Michaely, Frank Zhang, Gabor Simko, Carolina Parada and Petar Aleksic. 2017. Keyword spotting for Google assistant using contextual speech recognition. Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU), 2017 IEEE (pp. 272--278). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Redwhan Nour. 2015. Web searching by individuals with cognitive disabilities. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing 111, 19--25 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Thierry Olive. 2004. Working Memory in Writing: Empirical Evidence From the Dual-Task Technique. European Psychologist 9, 1, 32--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Susan B. Palmer, Michael L. Wehmeyer, Daniel Davies and Steven E. Stock. 2011. Family members' reports of the technology use of family members with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal Of Intellectual Disability Research 56, 4, 402--414.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ravihansa Rajapakse, Margot Brereton and Laurianne Sitbon. 2018. Design Artefacts to Support People with a Disability to Build Personal Infrastructures. In Proceedings of the 2018 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2018, pp. 277--288. ACM, 2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rocha, T., Bessa, M., Gonçalves, M., Cabral, L., Godinho, F., & Peres, E. 2012. The Recognition of Web Pages' Hyperlinks by People with Intellectual Disabilities: An Evaluation Study. Journal Of Applied Research In Intellectual Disabilities 25, 6, 542--552.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Tania Rocha, Diana Carvalho, Maximino Bessa, Sofia Reis and Luis Magalhães. 2016. Usability evaluation of navigation tasks by people with intellectual disabilities: a Google and SAPO comparative study regarding different interaction modalities. Universal Access In The Information Society 16, 3, 581--592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Laurianne Sitbon, Andrew A. Bayor, Filip Bircanin, Margot Brereton and Stewart Koplick. 2018. An Exploration of How People with Intellectual Disability Engage with Online Information Retrieval. In CHI'18. Montreal: In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. LBW536. ACM, 2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Laurianne Sitbon, Maria Hoogstrate, Stewart Koplick, Filip Bircanin and Margot Brereton M. 2018. A non-clinical approach to describing participants with intellectual disability, To appear Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Jennifer J. Thistle and Krista M. Wilkinson. 2013. Working Memory Demands of Aided Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities. Augmentative And Alternative Communication 29, 3, 235--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Thomas Welton, David Brown, Lindsay Evett and Nasser Sherkat. 2014. A brain-computer interface for the Dasher alternative text entry system. Universal Access In The Information Society 15, 1, 77--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Cara Wilson, Laurianne Sitbon, Margot Brereton, Daniel Johnson and Stewart Koplick. 2016. Put yourself in the picture': designing for futures with young adults with intellectual disability. In Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (pp. 271--281). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Alex Wong, Chetwyn Chan, Cecilia Li-Tsang, C and Chow Lam. 2009. Competence of people with intellectual disabilities on using human-computer interface. Research In Developmental Disabilities 30, 1, 107--123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Use of voice activated interfaces by people with intellectual disability

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        OzCHI '18: Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction
        December 2018
        639 pages
        ISBN:9781450361880
        DOI:10.1145/3292147

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 December 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate362of729submissions,50%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader