skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Adaptive Test for RF/Analog Circuit Using Higher Order Correlations among Measurements

Published:26 June 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

As process variations increase and devices get more diverse in their behavior, using the same test list for all devices is increasingly inefficient. Methodologies that adapt the test sequence with respect to lot, wafer, or even a device's own behavior help contain the test cost while maintaining test quality. In adaptive test selection approaches, the initial test list, a set of tests that are applied to all devices to learn information, plays a crucial role in the quality outcome. Most adaptive test approaches select this initial list based on fail probability of each test individually. Such a selection approach does not take into account the correlations that exist among various measurements and potentially will lead to the selection of correlated tests. In this work, we propose a new adaptive test algorithm that includes a mathematical model for initial test ordering that takes correlations among measurements into account. The proposed method can be integrated within an existing test flow running in the background to improve not only the test quality but also the test time. Experimental results using four distinct industry circuits and large amounts of measurement data show that the proposed technique outperforms prior approaches considerably.

References

  1. P. Drineas and Y. Makris. 2003. Independent test sequence compaction through integer programming. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Design. 380--386. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. H.-G. Stratigopoulos, P. Drineas, M. Slamani, and Y. Makris. 2007. Non-RF to RF test correlation using learning machines: A case study. In Proceedings of the IEEE VLSI Test Symposium. 9--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Biswas and R. D. Blanton. 2008. Test compaction for mixed-signal circuits using pass-fail test data. In Proceedings of the IEEE VLSI Test Symposium. 299--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Biswas and R. D. Blanton. 2006. Statistical test compaction using binary decision trees. IEEE Design Test Comput. 23, 6 (2006), 452--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Benner and O. Boroffice. 2001. Optimal production test times through adaptive test programming. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Test Conference. 908--915. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Christian Stritwieser. 2015. Real-time adaptive test algorithm including test escape estimation method. In Proceedings of the 20 th International Mixed-Signal Testing Workshop (IMSTW'15). 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. Ahmadi, A. Nahar, B. Orr, M. Past, and Y. Makris. 2016. Wafer-level process variation-driven probe-test flow selection for test cost reduction in analog/RF ICs. In Proceedings of the IEEE VLSI Test Symposium. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. H.-G. Stratigopoulos and Christian Streiwieser. 2017. Adaptive test flow for mixed-signal ICs. In Proceedings of the IEEE VLSI Test Symposium. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. E. Yilmaz and S. Ozev. 2009. Adaptive test elimination for analog/RF circuits. In Proceedings of the IEEE Design Automation Conference. 720--725. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. E. Yilmaz, S. Ozev, and K. M. Butler. 2010. Adaptive test flow for mixed-signal/RF circuits using learned information from device under test. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Test Conference. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. E. Yilmaz, S. Ozev, and K. M. Butler. 2013. Per-device adaptive test for analog/RF circuits using entropy-based process monitoring. IEEE Trans. VLSI Syst. 21, 6 (2013), 1116--1128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. E. Yilmaz, S. Ozev, and K. M. Butler. 2011. Adaptive multidimensional outlier analysis for analog and mixed signal circuits. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Test Conference. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. T. H. Cormen, C. Stein, R. L. Rivest, and C. E. Leiserson. 2001. Introduction to Algorithms (2nd. ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Suraj Sindia and Vishwani D. Agrawal. 2014. Specification test minimization for given defect level. In Proceedings of the 15 th Latin American Test Workshop. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. L. Milor. 1998. A tutorial introduction to research on analog and mixed-signal circuit testing. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. II: Analog Digital Sig. Proc. 45, 10 (1998), 1389--1407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. S. D. Huss and R. S. Gyurcsik. 1991. Optimal ordering of analog integrated circuit tests to minimize test time. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM Design Automation Conference. 494--499. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. W. Jiang and B. Vinnakota. 1999. Defect-oriented test scheduling. In Proceedings of the IEEE VLSI Test Symposium. 433--438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Baris Arslan and Alex Orailoglu. 2016. Aggressive test cost reductions through continuous test effectiveness assessment. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Design Integr. Circ. Syst. 35, 12 (2016), 2093--2103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. S. Biswas, P. Li, R. D. Blanton, and L. T. Pileggi. 2005. Specification test compaction for analog circuits and MEMS {accelerometer and opamp examples}. In Proceedings of the IEEE Design, Automation and Test in Europe. 164--169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. S. Akbay, J. L. Torres, J. M. Rumer, A. Chatterjee, and J. Amtsfield. 2006. Alternate test of RF front ends with IP constraints: Frequency domain test generation and validation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Test Conference. 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. N. Kupp, P. Drineas, M. Slamani, and Y. Makris. 2009. On boosting the accuracy of non-RF to RF correlation-based specification test compaction. Springer J. Electron. Test. 25, 6 (2009), 309--321. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. M. Chen and A. Orailoglu. 2008. Test cost minimization through adaptive test development. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Design. 234--239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. K. Huang, J. Wen, and J. Willmore. 2016. Test-suite-based analog/RF test time reduction using canonical correlation. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Design Integr. Circ. Syst. 35, 12 (2016), 2143--2147. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Thomas M. Cover and A. Joy. 2006. Element of Information Theory (2nd. ed.). Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, 19--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Gene H. Golub and Charles F. Van Loan. Matrix Computations (4th. ed.). JHU Press, Baltimore, MD, 246--259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Adaptive Test for RF/Analog Circuit Using Higher Order Correlations among Measurements

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems
      ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems  Volume 24, Issue 4
      July 2019
      258 pages
      ISSN:1084-4309
      EISSN:1557-7309
      DOI:10.1145/3326461
      • Editor:
      • Naehyuck Chang
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 June 2019
      • Accepted: 1 January 2019
      • Revised: 1 December 2018
      • Received: 1 August 2018
      Published in todaes Volume 24, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format