Jens Bennedsen
Michael E. Caspersen
- Bennedsen, J. and Caspersen, M. E. Failure rates in introductory programming. SIGCSE Bulletin 39, 2 (June 2007), 32--36 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Bruce. K. Five Big Open Questions in Computing Education. ACM Inroads, 9, 4 (2018), 77--80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Caspersen, M.E., Edwards, S.H., Barnes, T. and Garcia, D.D., Eds. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2017), Seattle, WA, USA, March 8--11. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Davoli, R., Godweber, M., Rössling and Polycarpou, I., Eds. (2017). Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 2017), Bologna, Italy, July 3--5. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ganter, S.L. and Haver, W.E. Partner Discipline Recommendations for Introductory College Mathematics and the Implications for College Algebra. The Mathematical Association of America, 2011.Google Scholar
- Guzdial. M. A Biased Attempt at Measuring Failure Rates in Introductory Programming, Computing Education Research Blog, September 30, 2014; https://computinged.wordpress.com/2014/09/30/a-biased-attempt-at-measuring-failure-rates-in-introductory-programming/. Accessed 2019 April 2.Google Scholar
- Kaila, E. Utilizing Educational Technology in Computer Science and Programming Classes---Theory and Practice, PhD Dissertation, Turku Centre for Computer Science, Department of Future Technologies, University of Turku, 2018.Google Scholar
- Kinshuk, Sampson, D.G., Vasiu, R., Chang, M, Chen, N-S and Huang, R., Eds. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2017), Timisoara, Romania, July 3--7.Google Scholar
- McGettrick, A., Boyle, R., Ibbett, R., Lloyd, J., Lovegrove, G. and Mander, K. Grand Challenges in Computing: Education, (The British Computer Society, 2004).Google Scholar
- Montero, C.S. and Joy, M., Eds. Proceedings of the 17th Koli Calling Conference on Computing Education Research (Koli 2017), Koli, Finland, November 16--19. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Teague, D. and Mason, R., Eds. Proceedings of the 19th Australasian Computing Education Conference (ACE 2017), Geelong, VIC, Australia, January 31-February 03.Google Scholar
- Watson, C. and Li., F.W.B. Failure Rates in Introductory Programming Revisited. Proceedings of the 19th annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE 2014). (New York, NY, USA ACM, 2014), 39--44 Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Failure rates in introductory programming: 12 years later
Recommendations
Failure rates in introductory programming
It is a common conception that CS1 is a very difficult course and that failure rates are high. However, until now there has only been anecdotal evidence for this claim. This article reports on a survey among institutions around the world regarding ...
Failure rates in introductory programming revisited
ITiCSE '14: Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Innovation & technology in computer science educationWhilst working on an upcoming meta-analysis that synthesized fifty years of research on predictors of programming performance, we made an interesting discovery. Despite several studies citing a motivation for research as the high failure rates of ...
The flowchart interpreter for introductory programming courses
FIE '98: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Frontiers in Education - Volume 01An introductory programming course offers students problem solving analysis and design experience as well as exposure to the basic tenets of algorithmic thinking. Unfortunately, most introductory programming courses tend to concentrate on the syntax of ...
Comments