skip to main content
10.1145/3349623.3355475acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Dead on Arrival: An Empirical Study of The Bluetooth 5.1 Positioning System

Published:04 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

The recently released Bluetooth 5.1 specification introduces fine-grained positioning capabilities in this wireless technology, which is deemed essential to context-/location-based Internet of Things (IoT) applications. In this paper, we evaluate experimentally, for the first time, the accuracy of a positioning system based on the Angle of Arrival (AoA) mechanism adopted by the Bluetooth standard. We first scrutinize the fidelity of angular detection and then assess the feasibility of using angle information from multiple fixed receivers to determine the position of a device. Our results reveal that angular detection is limited to a restricted range. On the other hand, even in a simple deployment with only two antennas per receiver, the AoA-based positioning technique can achieve sub-meter accuracy; yet attaining localization within a few centimeters remains a difficult endeavor. We then demonstrate that a malicious device may be able to easily alter the truthfulness of the measured AoA, by tampering with the packet structure. To counter this protocol weakness, we propose simple remedies that are missing in the standard, but which can be adopted with little effort by manufacturers, to secure the Bluetooth 5.1 positioning system.

References

  1. Cisco Meraki. Real-Time Location Services (RTLS). Accessed: June 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Apple Developer. https://developer.apple.com/ibeacon/. Accessed: June 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. F. Zafari, A. Gkelias, and K. K. Leung. A survey of indoor localization systems and technologies. IEEE Comms Surveys & Tutorials, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. K. Witrisal, P. Meissner, E. Leitinger, Y. Shen, C. Gustafson, F. Tufvesson, K. Haneda, D. Dardari, A. F. Molisch, A. Conti, and M. Z. Win. High-accuracy localization for assisted living: 5G systems will turn multipath channels from foe to friend. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 33(2):59--70, March 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bluetooth SIG. Core specification v5.1, Jan 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. T. I. Chowdhury, M. M. Rahman, S. Parvez, A. K. M. M. Alam, A. Basher, A. Alam, and S. Rizwan. A multi-step approach for RSSi-based distance estimation using smartphones. In Intl Conference on Networking Systems and Security (NSysS), pages 1--5, Jan 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. S. Bertuletti, A. Cereatti, U. Della, M. Caldara, and M. Galizzi. Indoor distance estimated from Bluetooth Low Energy signal strength: Comparison of regression models. In Proc. IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium, pages 1--5, April 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. C. Luo, L. Cheng, M. C. Chan, Y. Gu, J. Li, and Z. Ming. Pallas: Self-bootstrapping fine-grained passive indoor localization using wifi monitors. IEEE Trans. Mobile Computing, 16(2):466--481, Feb 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Deepak Vasisht, Swarun Kumar, and Dina Katabi. Decimeter-level localization with a single wifi access point. In Proc USENIX NSDI, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. X. Li, D. Xu, X. Wang, and R. Muhammad. Design and implementation of indoor positioning system based on ibeacon. In International Conference on Audio, Language and Image Processing (ICALIP), pages 126--130, July 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. X. Lin, T. Ho, C. Fang, Z. Yen, B. Yang, and F. Lai. A mobile indoor positioning system based on ibeacon technology. In International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pages 4970--4973, Aug 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. B. Kempke, P. Pannuto, and P. Dutta. Polypoint: Guiding indoor quadrotors with ultra-wideband localization. In Proc. ACM Hot Wireless, pages 16--20, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. B. Kempke, P. Pannuto, B. Campbell, and P. Dutta. Surepoint: Exploiting ultra wideband flooding and diversity to provide robust, scalable, high-fidelity indoor localization. In Proc. ACM SenSys, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Bluetooth SIG. Press release: Bluetooth enhances support for location services with new direction finding feature, Jan 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. R. Schmidt. Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation. IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propagation, 34(3):276--280, March 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. Ji, J. Kim, J. Jeon, and Y. Cho. Analysis of positioning accuracy corresponding to the number of ble beacons in indoor positioning system. In International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), pages 92--95, July 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. G. De Blasio, A. Quesada-Arencibia, C. R. García, J. C. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, and R. Moreno-Díaz. A protocol-channel-based indoor positioning performance study for bluetooth low energy. IEEE Access, 6:33440--33450, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. J. Powar, C. Gao, and R. Harle. Assessing the impact of multi-channel BLE beacons on fingerprint-based positioning. In Proc. IPIN, Sep. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. S. Monfared, T. Nguyen, L. Petrillo, P. De Doncker, and F. Horlin. Experimental demonstration of ble transmitter positioning based on aoa estimation. In Proc. IEEE PIMRC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Z. Zhu and M. Z. Bocus. A computationally efficient method for direction finding with known transmit sequence. In Proc. IPIN, Sep. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Dead on Arrival: An Empirical Study of The Bluetooth 5.1 Positioning System

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WiNTECH '19: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Wireless Network Testbeds, Experimental Evaluation & Characterization
        October 2019
        58 pages
        ISBN:9781450369312
        DOI:10.1145/3349623

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 October 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate63of100submissions,63%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader