skip to main content
10.1145/3357384.3358121acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Additive Explanations for Anomalies Detected from Multivariate Temporal Data

Published:03 November 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Detecting anomalies from high-dimensional multivariate temporal data is challenging, because of the non-linear, complex relationships between signals. Recently, deep learning methods based on autoencoders have been shown to capture these relationships and accurately discern between normal and abnormal patterns of behavior, even in fully unsupervised scenarios. However, validating the anomalies detected is difficult without additional explanations. In this paper, we extend SHAP -- a unified framework for providing additive explanations, previously applied for supervised models -- with influence weighting, in order to explain anomalies detected from multivariate time series with a GRU-based autoencoder. Namely, we extract the signals that contribute most to an anomaly and those that counteract it. We evaluate our approach on two use cases and show that we can generate insightful explanations for both single and multiple anomalies.

References

  1. A. Del Giorno et al. 2016a. Informative Features for Anomaly Detection. In ICML Anomaly Detection Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Shrikumar et al. 2017a. Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differences. In ICML.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. C. Zhang et al. 2018a. A Deep Neural Network for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection and Diagnosis in Multivariate Time Series Data. In arXiv:1811.08055.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. E. Gutflaish et al. 2019 a. Temporal Anomaly Detection: Calibrating the Surprise. In AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Sundararajan et al. 2017b. Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks. In ICML.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. T. Ribeiro et al. 2016b. Why Should I Trust You?: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. In KDD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R. Andrzejak et al. 2001. Indications of Nonlinear Deterministic and Finite Dimensional Structures in Time Series of Brain Electrical Activity: Dependence on Recording Region and Brain State. In Phys. Rev. E.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. U. Bhatt et al. 2019 b. Towards Aggregating Weighted Feature Attributions. AAAI Workshop on Network Interpretability for Deep Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Y. Guo et al. 2018b. Multidimensional Time Series Anomaly Detection: A GRU-based Gaussian Mixture Variational Autoencoder Approach. In ACML.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Y. Ikeda et al. 2019 c. Estimations for Dimensions Contributing to Detected Anomalies with Variational Autoencoders. In AAAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. P. W. Koh and P. Liang. 2017. Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functions. In ICML.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. S. M. Lundberg and S. Lee. 2017. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. In NIPS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Additive Explanations for Anomalies Detected from Multivariate Temporal Data

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CIKM '19: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
          November 2019
          3373 pages
          ISBN:9781450369763
          DOI:10.1145/3357384

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 3 November 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          CIKM '19 Paper Acceptance Rate202of1,031submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

          Upcoming Conference

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader